What trust problems does blockchain solve?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the blockchain trust solutions market in a clean and beautiful presentation

Blockchain technology is fundamentally reshaping how businesses establish and maintain trust across financial systems, supply chains, and digital identity verification.

In 2025, blockchain trust solutions have moved beyond theoretical applications to deliver quantifiable results across multiple industries, with companies reporting significant fraud reduction, cost savings, and operational efficiency improvements. And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

Summary

Blockchain trust solutions are transforming traditional systems by eliminating single points of failure and providing immutable, transparent records. Major industries are seeing measurable benefits, with supply chain traceability reducing recall times from weeks to seconds, while DeFi protocols have reached $8 billion in RWA tokenization TVL by 2025.

Industry/Application Trust Problem Solved Quantified Results Key Players
Food Safety & Supply Chain Opaque traceability leading to weeks-long contamination investigations Recall trace time reduced from weeks to seconds IBM Food Trust, Walmart
International Shipping Paper-based documentation causing 40% longer transit times 40% faster shipment approvals, 20% documentation cost savings Maersk TradeLens
Diamond Provenance Origin fraud and lack of ethical sourcing verification 100% production tracked, 1M diamonds registered weekly De Beers Tracr
DeFi & Tokenization Lack of transparency in traditional asset backing $8 billion TVL in RWA tokenization, 30% compliance cost reduction Centrifuge, Ondo Finance
Digital Identity Centralized data breaches and over-disclosure of personal information 30% enterprise adoption of zero-knowledge proofs for identity Trinsic, MATTR
Financial Services Settlement delays and counterparty risk in global banking 90% reduction in model recalls through automated documentation FICO blockchain systems
Government Services Centralized trust anchors creating single points of failure Immutable citizen logs reducing fraud in e-Government Estonia e-Residency

Get a Clear, Visual
Overview of This Market

We've already structured this market in a clean, concise, and up-to-date presentation. If you don't have time to waste digging around, download it now.

DOWNLOAD THE DECK

What exactly is broken about trust in today's systems, especially in finance, supply chains, and digital identity?

Traditional trust systems suffer from three fundamental flaws: centralized single points of failure, opaque intermediaries, and data silos that prevent real-time verification.

In finance, global banks struggle with opaque reconciliation processes that create settlement delays lasting days and expose institutions to counterparty risk. Third-party custodians create single points of failure, susceptible to breaches and fraud. When banks cannot immediately verify transactions across their networks, they must rely on time-consuming manual reconciliation that breeds errors and delays.

Supply chains face even more acute trust deficits. Paper-based records and siloed IT systems delay contamination source tracing, extending recall times to weeks. The 2018 E. coli outbreak in romaine lettuce took the FDA 51 days to identify the source farm, during which consumers avoided all romaine lettuce nationwide. Complex multi-party handoffs in international shipping create documentation bottlenecks that can extend transit times by 40% and increase documentation costs by 20%.

Digital identity systems concentrate massive amounts of sensitive data in centralized repositories, creating attractive targets for hackers. The 2017 Equifax breach exposed 147 million Americans' personal data, while federated models still rely on centralized trust anchors that can fail catastrophically.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

Which industries have seen measurable gains from using blockchain to solve trust issues in 2025, and how was success quantified?

Food safety leads blockchain adoption with the most dramatic quantified improvements, followed by shipping logistics and luxury goods authentication.

Walmart has partnered with IBM to create the Food Trust Network, a blockchain-based platform that allows food suppliers, processors, and retailers to track the journey of food products from farm to table. The results are striking: trace time for contamination sources dropped from weeks to seconds. During a 2019 mango contamination incident, Walmart traced the source to a specific farm in under 2.2 seconds using blockchain records.

International shipping has achieved substantial efficiency gains through blockchain documentation. Maersk's TradeLens platform has achieved 40% faster shipment approvals and 20% documentation cost savings by automating bill of lading approvals and eliminating manual paperwork bottlenecks. The platform now processes over 154 million shipping events annually.

Diamond provenance tracking demonstrates blockchain's power in luxury goods authentication. De Beers' Tracr platform provides immutable provenance tracking for 100% of production, registering over 1 million diamonds weekly. This eliminates origin fraud and provides retailers with cryptographic proof of ethical sourcing.

DeFi tokenization has reached unprecedented scale in 2025. As of 2025, the RWA tokenization market reaches $8 billion in total value locked (TVL), with Centrifuge and similar platforms achieving 30% compliance cost reduction through automated zero-knowledge proof verification.

The Market Pitch
Without the Noise

We have prepared a clean, beautiful and structured summary of this market, ideal if you want to get smart fast, or present it clearly.

DOWNLOAD
Blockchain Market customer needs

If you want to build on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What types of trust problems does blockchain solve better than traditional centralized databases or third-party intermediaries?

Blockchain excels at eliminating single points of authority, providing immutable audit trails, and enabling consensus-based verification without relying on trusted intermediaries.

Traditional databases require a central administrator who controls all records and can potentially alter or delete data. Blockchain's distributed ledger across nodes removes central points of authority and tampering risk, ensuring permanent, auditable records. This fundamental architecture change means no single entity can unilaterally modify transaction history.

Consensus-based trust represents blockchain's most significant advancement over traditional systems. Trust is achieved cryptographically via consensus (PoW, PoS, BFT) rather than trust in a single administrator, dramatically reducing manipulation potential. Instead of trusting a bank's internal systems, parties can verify transactions through mathematical proof validated by multiple independent nodes.

Transparency and selective disclosure give blockchain unique advantages. Public blockchains provide full transaction visibility for compliance and auditing, while permissioned ledgers enable granular access controls. Smart contracts can automate complex business logic without human intervention, reducing errors and processing delays.

The immutability aspect is particularly powerful for compliance and regulatory reporting. Once data enters a blockchain, it cannot be retroactively altered without detection, providing regulatory bodies with cryptographic proof of data integrity over time.

Where have smart contracts or decentralized consensus mechanisms reduced fraud, manipulation, or costs over the past year?

Smart contracts have delivered measurable fraud reduction and cost savings across supply chain automation, financial settlements, and compliance documentation.

TradeLens smart contracts automate bill of lading approvals, eliminating manual errors that previously caused shipping disputes. Smart contracts handle compliance checks, reducing human errors and speeding up logistics. The platform's automated validation prevents fraudulent documentation from entering the shipping pipeline.

Diamond authentication through De Beers Tracr demonstrates fraud elimination at scale. The platform's tamper-proof records have eliminated origin fraud completely, allowing retailers to verify provenance cryptographically rather than relying on paper certificates that can be forged. This has reduced due-diligence costs for jewelry retailers by an estimated 25-30%.

Food safety smart contracts prevent counterfeit products from re-entering supply chains. IBM Food Trust's smart contracts can automatically quarantine products when contamination is detected, preventing fraudulent re-labeling or re-introduction of recalled items.

Financial services have seen dramatic improvements in model governance. FICO developed a private blockchain that automated documentation and standards in model development, reducing support issues and model recalls by over 90%. This represents millions in cost savings from avoided regulatory penalties and operational disruptions.

Wondering who's shaping this fast-moving industry? Our slides map out the top players and challengers in seconds.

How do permissionless vs permissioned blockchains impact trust differently, and in which cases is each more effective?

Permissionless blockchains maximize transparency and censorship resistance, while permissioned blockchains optimize for performance and regulatory compliance in enterprise environments.

Feature Permissionless (e.g., Ethereum) Permissioned (e.g., Hyperledger Fabric)
Trust Model Open, censorship-resistant, public verification available to anyone Restricted participants with governed access and known identities
Consensus Speed PoW/PoS consensus (slower but more secure, 15 seconds to minutes) BFT or RAFT consensus (faster, sub-second to seconds)
Energy Efficiency Higher energy consumption, especially PoW networks Energy-efficient due to known validators and optimized consensus
Ideal Use Cases DeFi protocols, tokenization, public transparency requirements Enterprise supply chains, trade finance, regulated financial services
Trust Effectiveness Global auditability, resistant to single-party control Confidentiality with performance for regulated consortia
Regulatory Compliance Complex due to global, open access and unclear jurisdiction Easier to comply with KYC, AML, and data protection regulations
Data Privacy All data publicly visible (though can be encrypted) Granular privacy controls and selective data sharing

What are the key limitations or trade-offs of using blockchain for trust—such as scalability, latency, or energy use—and how are these evolving by 2026?

Blockchain trust solutions face three critical limitations: throughput constraints, latency issues, and energy consumption, though emerging technologies are addressing each challenge.

Scalability remains the primary bottleneck. Public chains handle ≲100 transactions per second, while enterprise applications may require thousands of TPS. Ethereum processes roughly 15 TPS, while Visa handles 65,000 TPS during peak periods. However, Layer-2 scaling solutions and sharding are rapidly maturing.

Latency affects real-time applications significantly. Block finality can take seconds to minutes, making blockchain unsuitable for high-frequency trading or instant payment verification without off-chain solutions. Bitcoin confirmations take 10 minutes on average, while Ethereum takes about 15 seconds but may require multiple confirmations for security.

Energy consumption varies dramatically by consensus mechanism. Proof-of-Work networks like Bitcoin consume approximately 150 TWh annually—equivalent to Argentina's entire energy consumption. However, Proof-of-Stake networks like post-merge Ethereum use 99.9% less energy.

By 2026, these limitations are evolving rapidly. ZK-rollups and optimistic rollups are expected to increase throughput to over 1,000 TPS while maintaining security. Interoperability protocols will enable seamless asset transfer between chains, reducing the need for all applications to operate on a single blockchain.

Need a clear, elegant overview of a market? Browse our structured slide decks for a quick, visual deep dive.

We've Already Mapped This Market

From key figures to models and players, everything's already in one structured and beautiful deck, ready to download.

DOWNLOAD
Blockchain Market problems

If you want clear data about this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What regulatory frameworks or legal precedents are emerging in 2025 that affect trust in blockchain-based systems globally?

2025 marks a pivotal year for blockchain regulation, with major jurisdictions implementing comprehensive frameworks that legitimize blockchain trust systems while establishing clear compliance requirements.

The European Union's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCAR) regulation, which entered force in late 2024, provides harmonized rules across 27 member states. MiCAR regulation covers token classification, custody requirements, and comprehensive reporting standards, reducing legal uncertainty by up to 70% according to industry surveys. This framework specifically addresses stablecoin reserves and market abuse across EU member states.

The United States is implementing clearer crypto asset jurisdiction under new SEC and CFTC clarifications. Expected legislation aims to delineate token oversight responsibilities, with a more "crypto-friendly" regulatory approach under the current administration. The proposed bills would establish licensing frameworks for digital asset custody and trading.

Hong Kong's Securities and Futures Commission expanded its Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) licensing regime in 2025, introducing stringent KYC/AML requirements while enabling compliant blockchain operations. Hong Kong's SFC plans a pilot program for tokenized funds in Q1 2025.

Singapore's Monetary Authority (MAS) is consulting on comprehensive digital securities frameworks, targeting mid-2025 implementation. These frameworks will enable cross-border passporting rights, potentially attracting an estimated $100 billion in new blockchain asset issuances over the next two years.

Global AML/KYC standards under FATF's travel rule mandate enhanced blockchain analytics and transaction monitoring, requiring exchanges and service providers to collect and transmit customer information for transactions above $1,000.

How do tokenization and decentralized finance (DeFi) help build or rebuild trust in financial systems, and what recent case studies support this?

Tokenization and DeFi rebuild financial trust through 24/7 transparent verification, programmable compliance, and elimination of traditional intermediary risks.

Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization provides continuous auditability that traditional finance cannot match. Platforms like Centrifuge and BlackRock's BUIDL fund have achieved $8 billion in TVL, offering on-chain proof of reserves and dynamic collateralization. Unlike traditional funds that report holdings quarterly, tokenized assets provide real-time verification of underlying collateral.

Centrifuge's structured credit funds demonstrate institutional DeFi adoption. The platform achieved institutional participation by integrating with established DeFi protocols like Aave and MakerDAO, demonstrating secure, transparent lending with automated compliance checks. Their pools have maintained 100% repayment rates while offering yields 200-400 basis points higher than traditional fixed income.

BlackRock's BUIDL represents traditional finance embracing blockchain trust mechanisms. The fund has grown to over $500 million in assets under management, with all holdings verified on-chain and available for real-time audit. This eliminates traditional trust requirements around custodian reporting and asset verification.

MakerDAO's integration of RWAs into DAI stablecoin backing demonstrates DeFi's evolution toward real-world trust anchors. The protocol now backs DAI with U.S. Treasury bills and corporate bonds, providing yield generation while maintaining decentralized governance. This hybrid approach combines traditional asset stability with blockchain transparency.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

What role does identity verification, zero-knowledge proofs, or verifiable credentials play in strengthening trust via blockchain today?

Zero-knowledge proofs and verifiable credentials enable selective disclosure of identity attributes, solving the over-sharing problem that plagues current digital identity systems.

Zero-knowledge proofs allow individuals to prove certain attributes without revealing underlying data, with 30% of enterprises adopting ZKP-based identity verification by 2025. Instead of sharing a complete driver's license to prove age, users can cryptographically prove they are over 21 without revealing their exact birth date, address, or license number.

Verifiable Credentials (VCs) following W3C standards enable institutions to issue tamper-proof digital credentials that users control completely. Universities can issue degree credentials that students own and present selectively, proving graduation without revealing GPA or specific coursework details. Healthcare organizations issue professional licenses as VCs, enabling practitioners to prove qualifications without exposing personal information.

BBS+ signatures represent the leading implementation of selective disclosure. Trinsic's platform uses BBS+ signatures to enable users to prove statements about their credentials without revealing the entire credential. For example, an insurance verification can prove "active coverage" without disclosing the insurance company, policy details, or premium amounts.

Google's integration of zero-knowledge proofs for age verification demonstrates mainstream adoption. Users can now prove they meet age requirements without creating linkable data trails, implementing "unlinkability" that prevents tracking across services. This addresses regulatory requirements while preserving user privacy.

The French Data Protection Authority (CNIL) now requires adult content sites to offer double-blind age verification methods, recognizing ZKPs as privacy-compliant identity verification. This regulatory endorsement accelerates enterprise adoption of zero-knowledge identity systems.

Blockchain Market business models

If you want to build or invest on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

How are major corporations or governments deploying blockchain to solve real-world trust issues, and what results have been observed so far?

Major corporations and governments are implementing blockchain solutions for supply chain transparency, digital identity, and financial compliance, with measurable improvements in efficiency and fraud reduction.

Organization Blockchain Initiative Measured Outcomes
Walmart & Carrefour IBM Food Trust for end-to-end food traceability Contamination trace time reduced from weeks to seconds; consumer confidence increased measurably through transparent sourcing
Maersk & IBM TradeLens shipping documentation platform 40% faster customs clearance; 154 million shipping events recorded; 20% reduction in documentation costs
De Beers Tracr diamond provenance tracking 100% of production tracked with immutable provenance; 1 million diamonds registered weekly; eliminated origin fraud
Estonia Government e-Residency & KSI Blockchain for citizen records Immutable citizen logs with cryptographic integrity; reduced e-Government fraud; enabled digital nomad economy
FICO Private blockchain for AI model governance 90% reduction in model support issues and recalls; accelerated time-to-market for AI innovations
Dubai Government Blockchain-based business licensing and permits 25% reduction in licensing processing time; enhanced transparency in government operations
DMG Blockchain Solutions Systemic Trust carbon-neutral Bitcoin custody Regulatory-compliant digital asset custody with carbon neutrality; institutional adoption growing

What are the most promising blockchain startups or protocols launched in 2025 focused on solving trust problems, and how are they gaining traction?

2025 has produced several breakthrough blockchain startups addressing specific trust gaps in identity, energy, healthcare, and financial markets, with early traction indicators suggesting strong product-market fit.

  • LumiShare: Focuses on tokenizing renewable energy credits with integrated Verifiable Credentials. The platform has partnered with 15 solar farms across California and Texas, tokenizing over $50 million in renewable energy certificates. Their unique approach combines energy provenance tracking with carbon credit verification, attracting interest from major utilities and ESG-focused institutional investors.
  • Legitified: Specializes in healthcare data security using zero-knowledge proofs for interoperability. They've secured partnerships with three major hospital systems and processed over 100,000 patient record verifications without exposing underlying health data. Their HIPAA-compliant ZKP implementation has reduced medical record verification time from hours to seconds.
  • 31Third: Develops on-chain trade execution infrastructure for low-latency financial markets. Despite being early-stage, they've achieved sub-100ms trade settlement times and signed pilot agreements with two mid-tier trading firms. Their approach to combining traditional market microstructure with blockchain settlement addresses a clear institutional need.
  • Babylon Protocol: Creates liquid restaking and PoS network security marketplaces. They've attracted over $200 million in TVL within six months of launch, demonstrating strong demand for yield-bearing security staking. Their protocol enables Bitcoin holders to participate in Proof-of-Stake consensus for other networks, creating new utility for dormant Bitcoin.

These startups are gaining traction through enterprise partnerships rather than retail speculation, indicating genuine problem-solving capabilities. Legitified's healthcare partnerships demonstrate regulatory compliance in a heavily regulated sector, while LumiShare's utility partnerships suggest institutional demand for transparency in ESG credentials.

Curious about how money is made in this sector? Explore the most profitable business models in our sleek decks.

What is the likely trajectory for blockchain-based trust infrastructure in the next 5 years, and where are the biggest investment opportunities or gaps?

The trajectory for blockchain trust infrastructure through 2030 points toward mainstream institutional adoption, with the greatest opportunities in cross-chain interoperability, privacy-preserving identity systems, and regulatory technology integration.

Layer-2 and Hybrid Chain Dominance: ZK-rollups and optimistic rollups will become standard, enabling enterprise-grade throughput while maintaining security. Polygon, Arbitrum, and newer players will capture significant value as transaction costs approach traditional payment processing fees. Investment opportunities exist in rollup infrastructure and developer tooling.

Interoperability as Infrastructure: Cross-chain bridges and protocols like Cosmos Hub and Polkadot will unify fragmented liquidity across blockchain networks. The winning protocols will enable seamless asset transfer and data sharing, potentially creating $50-100 billion in unlocked value through improved capital efficiency.

DeFi 2.0 Institutional Integration: Tokenized Real-World Assets will expand beyond the current $8 billion TVL to potentially $500 billion by 2028. BlackRock's success with BUIDL demonstrates institutional appetite, while regulatory clarity will accelerate traditional asset tokenization. Investment gaps exist in compliance infrastructure and institutional custody solutions.

Self-Sovereign Identity Universal Adoption: Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) and Verifiable Credentials will become standard for enterprise identity management. The market opportunity approaches $30 billion as organizations replace legacy identity systems with blockchain-based alternatives that provide better security and user control.

RegTech and Compliance Automation: AI-driven monitoring for on-chain AML/KYC compliance represents a blue-ocean opportunity. As blockchain transaction volumes grow exponentially, regulatory compliance tools that provide real-time risk assessment and automated reporting will become essential infrastructure.

Investment Gaps: Scalable privacy solutions remain underfunded despite clear demand. Sustainable consensus mechanisms that balance security with energy efficiency need continued innovation. Enterprise-grade governance frameworks for blockchain systems require significant development investment. Standardized tokenization protocols that work across multiple jurisdictions present substantial opportunities for early-stage ventures.

Conclusion

Sources

  1. DMG Blockchain Solutions Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results
  2. IBM Blog - Measure trust with blockchain technology
  3. A blockchain-based trust management method for Internet of Things - ScienceDirect
  4. A blockchain-based trust management framework with verifiable interactions - ScienceDirect
  5. Enhancing trust transfer in supply chain finance: a blockchain-based transitive trust model
  6. Building blocks: How financial services can create trust in blockchain
  7. Using Blockchain to Build Customer Trust in AI
  8. Tokenization of RWA in 2025: Process Breakdown
  9. Unlocking RWA Tokenization in 2025: Key Trends, Top Use Cases & DeFi Insights
  10. RWA Crypto Boom: Tokenizing Real-World Assets in 2025
  11. Top 10 Real World Assets (RWA) Crypto in July 2025
  12. Top five RWA projects you can't afford to ignore in 2025
  13. Top Real World Assets (RWA) Coins by Market Cap
  14. Real-World Assets: Bridging Physical and Blockchain Worlds
  15. Blockchain in Supply Chain Transparency: Revolutionizing Industry Practices by 2025
  16. Transforming Supply Chain with Blockchain and AI in 2025
  17. Zero knowledge proofs reveal their utility for age verification and beyond
  18. Zero Knowledge Proofs in the Trinsic Platform with BBS Signatures
  19. Implementing verifiable credentials using blockchain and zero knowledge proofs
  20. Top 10 Blockchains for RWA Tokenization Platform Development
Back to blog