What's the revenue model for BNPL companies?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the Buy Now Pay Later market in a clean and beautiful presentation

Buy Now Pay Later companies generate revenue through multiple streams, with merchant fees being the primary source at 2-6% per transaction.

The industry has evolved from simple installment plans to sophisticated financial ecosystems that serve both consumers and businesses. Understanding these revenue mechanics is crucial for anyone looking to enter this $560 billion market projected for 2025.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

What are the core revenue streams for BNPL companies today?

BNPL companies generate revenue through three primary channels: merchant fees (70-90% of total revenue), consumer fees and interest, and ancillary services.

Merchant fees represent the largest revenue component, ranging from 2% for large retailers with prime customer bases to 6% for small-to-medium enterprises. Klarna reports a take rate of 2.77% across their merchant base, while Afterpay charges 3-6% depending on merchant size and risk profile. These fees are justified by the 20-30% conversion lift and 20-50% increase in average order value that merchants typically experience.

Consumer-facing revenue includes late fees ($5-30 per missed payment) and interest on extended financing plans (10-36% APR). However, regulatory pressure is reducing reliance on late fees, with Australia capping annual fees at AU$320 in the first year. Interest-bearing plans are becoming more important as providers expand into larger-ticket purchases requiring 3-24 month repayment terms.

Ancillary revenue streams include interchange-sharing when customers pay via credit card, referral commissions from insurance or loyalty programs, and data licensing. Some providers like Affirm also generate income from their savings products and merchant cash advance services.

Need a clear, elegant overview of a market? Browse our structured slide decks for a quick, visual deep dive.

How do BNPL companies typically charge merchants, and what is the average commission?

BNPL providers charge merchants a percentage-based commission on each transaction, with rates varying based on merchant size, category, and customer risk profile.

If you want to build on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What are the different consumer fees, penalties, or interest structures used by BNPL providers?

BNPL providers employ two primary consumer fee structures: short-term interest-free plans with late penalties, and longer-term installment loans with interest charges.

The traditional "Pay-in-4" model offers four equal installments over 6 weeks with no interest, but imposes late fees ranging from $5-30 per missed payment. These fees are increasingly regulated, with Australia limiting total fees to AU$320 annually and several US states considering similar caps. Providers like Klarna have moved away from late fees entirely to avoid regulatory scrutiny and improve customer relationships.

Extended financing plans (3-24 months) generate higher revenue through interest charges. APR rates vary significantly based on creditworthiness: prime borrowers might pay 10-15% APR while non-prime customers face rates up to 36%. Affirm's longer-term loans average around 19% APR, generating substantially more revenue per transaction than short-term plans.

Some providers add origination fees (1-3% of loan amount) or processing fees for certain payment methods. However, the trend is toward transparent, all-inclusive pricing as regulators demand clearer consumer disclosures. Healthcare BNPL providers often charge zero interest, instead earning revenue from healthcare providers who fund the patient financing.

How does the underwriting process affect profitability and default risk?

Underwriting quality directly determines BNPL profitability by balancing conversion rates against credit losses, with successful providers maintaining default rates around 2% compared to credit cards' 10%.

Most BNPL providers use soft credit checks combined with bank account verification and transaction history analysis. This approach maintains high conversion rates (often 80-90% approval) while keeping defaults manageable. The mandatory automatic debit feature significantly reduces default risk compared to traditional credit products, as funds are automatically withdrawn from customer accounts.

AI-driven underwriting models analyze hundreds of data points including transaction patterns, device fingerprinting, social media signals, and real-time financial behavior. Klarna's machine learning algorithms process over 1 billion data points per decision, enabling split-second approvals while maintaining risk discipline. These sophisticated models allow providers to offer credit to consumers with limited credit history.

Profitable providers like Affirm invest heavily in underwriting technology, with dedicated data science teams continuously refining risk models. They also maintain strict loss rate targets (typically 2-4% of gross merchandise volume) and adjust approval rates based on economic conditions. During economic downturns, providers tighten underwriting criteria, accepting lower conversion rates to preserve profitability.

What partnerships or integrations do successful BNPL companies rely on?

Successful BNPL companies depend on deep integrations with e-commerce platforms, POS systems, and payment gateways to achieve scale and merchant adoption.

E-commerce platform integrations are crucial for online growth. Klarna, Afterpay, and Affirm maintain native plugins for Shopify, Magento, WooCommerce, and BigCommerce, enabling one-click merchant onboarding. These integrations often include advanced features like dynamic pricing, A/B testing capabilities, and real-time analytics. Shopify's partnership with Shop Pay Installments exemplifies how platform-native BNPL can drive massive adoption.

POS system partnerships enable in-store BNPL adoption. Klarna's partnership with Clover brings BNPL to over 100,000 US merchants, while Nexi's XPay integration serves European retail markets. These partnerships require complex technical integration to support real-time credit decisions at physical checkout terminals.

Payment gateway partnerships with Stripe, PayPal, and regional processors provide essential infrastructure. Apple Pay Later's integration with Apple Wallet demonstrates how tech giants can rapidly scale BNPL through existing payment ecosystems. These partnerships often include revenue-sharing agreements and co-marketing support.

Banking partnerships provide funding and regulatory expertise. Many BNPL providers partner with banks for credit facilities, securitization, and compliance support. These relationships are particularly important for international expansion and regulatory navigation.

Wondering who's shaping this fast-moving industry? Our slides map out the top players and challengers in seconds.

What are the most common business models used in the BNPL industry today?

The BNPL industry operates through four primary business models: B2C proprietary platforms, B2B commercial financing, white-label solutions, and B2B2C partnership models.

If you want actionable data about this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Which BNPL companies are the most profitable as of 2025, and what strategies set them apart?

Klarna and Affirm lead profitability in 2025, with Klarna achieving four consecutive profitable quarters and Affirm reporting GAAP net income of $25 million in Q1 2025.

Klarna's profitability stems from optimized take rates (2.77% average), diversified revenue streams including banking services, and disciplined underwriting maintaining low loss rates. Their Q1 2025 results showed $701 million in revenue with $3 million adjusted operating profit, demonstrating the scalability of their model. Klarna's expansion into banking services (savings accounts, cards) creates additional revenue streams beyond traditional BNPL.

Affirm's success comes from longer-term, interest-bearing loans that generate higher yields per transaction. Their 12.5% operating margin in Q1 2025 reflects strong unit economics, with robust operating cash flow of $180 million. Affirm's focus on larger-ticket purchases (average $750+ transactions) and partnerships with major retailers like Amazon drive higher-value transactions.

The Australian "Big 3" (Afterpay, Zip, Humm) maintain profitability through high merchant fees (3-7%) and expansion into automotive and home furnishing verticals. Their regulated status under Australia's National Consumer Credit Protection Act provides competitive moats through compliance barriers for new entrants.

Key differentiating strategies include: advanced AI underwriting reducing credit losses, diversified business models beyond consumer BNPL, strong merchant partnerships driving volume, and geographic expansion into high-growth markets. Profitable providers also maintain disciplined growth, prioritizing unit economics over pure scale.

Which revenue models have gained the most traction globally in 2025 and why?

White-label and "BNPL-as-a-Service" models have gained the most traction in 2025, driven by banks and fintechs seeking rapid BNPL deployment without building proprietary solutions.

The white-label model allows established financial institutions to offer BNPL under their own brand while leveraging specialist technology. This approach provides faster time-to-market (typically 3-6 months vs. 12-18 months for proprietary development) and lower upfront investment. Companies like Arttha and Axytos report 300%+ growth in partner onboarding during 2025.

Interest-bearing extended plans (3-24 month terms) have gained traction as providers seek higher yields. These plans generate 3-5x more revenue per transaction than traditional pay-in-4 models. Affirm's average revenue per transaction increased 40% year-over-year as they shifted toward longer-term financing.

B2B BNPL models are expanding rapidly, with transaction volumes growing 45% annually. B2B purchases typically involve larger amounts ($10,000-$500,000+) and longer terms, generating higher absolute revenue per transaction despite lower percentage fees. Regulatory advantages (fewer consumer protection requirements) and lower marketing costs make B2B BNPL highly attractive.

Geographic expansion models focusing on emerging markets show strong traction, particularly in Southeast Asia, Latin America, and the Middle East where traditional credit access is limited. These markets often support higher merchant fees (4-8%) due to increased conversion lift.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

What are examples of emerging or niche BNPL models expected to grow in 2026?

Healthcare, education, rent, and subscription management represent the fastest-growing BNPL niches expected to expand significantly in 2026.

• Healthcare BNPL: "Care now, pay later" financing for medical procedures, dental work, and elective treatments. Companies like PayZen offer zero-interest plans funded by healthcare providers, who benefit from improved patient payment rates (95%+ vs. 70% for traditional billing). Expected market size: $15 billion by 2026.
• Education BNPL: Tuition installment plans and course financing integrated with Learning Management Systems. Resolve Pay and similar providers enable students to split tuition payments, with educational institutions often subsidizing interest costs. This model addresses the $1.7 trillion student debt crisis with more flexible repayment options.
• Rent BNPL ("RNPL"): Annual rent payments financed through monthly installments, particularly popular in GCC markets where annual rent payments are common. Tenants can spread 12-month rent over installments with 2-5% premiums, improving cash flow management.
• Subscription BNPL: "Subscribe Now, Pay Later" splits annual software subscriptions into monthly installments. Companies like Tranch target B2B SaaS purchases, enabling businesses to spread software costs over time. This model addresses the $130 billion annual SaaS market.
• Travel BNPL: Vacation and travel expense financing with specialized underwriting for seasonal spending patterns. Higher transaction values ($2,000-$10,000) generate substantial revenue per customer.

If you need to-the-point data on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Which startups are innovating or disrupting the BNPL space right now, and what is their approach?

Qlarifi, PayZen, Mondu, and Tranch represent the most innovative BNPL startups, each addressing specific market gaps through specialized technology and business models.

How do BNPL providers manage funding, and how does that impact their growth?

BNPL providers use three primary funding mechanisms: debt facilities, securitization, and balance sheet lending, each impacting growth differently.

Warehouse credit facilities provide the most common funding structure, where banks or institutional investors fund BNPL receivables through revolving credit lines. These facilities typically cost 3-7% annually and allow providers to scale without using balance sheet capital. Klarna and Affirm maintain multi-billion dollar warehouse facilities with major banks, enabling rapid transaction volume growth.

Asset-backed securitization allows providers to package and sell BNPL receivables to capital markets investors. This approach provides lower-cost funding (typically 2-5% vs. warehouse rates) and frees up balance sheet capacity for growth. Affirm has completed multiple securitizations totaling over $2 billion, demonstrating investor confidence in BNPL asset quality.

Balance sheet lending involves holding consumer loans on the company's books, funded by equity or debt capital. This approach provides higher net interest margins but requires more capital and regulatory oversight. Smaller providers often start with balance sheet models before transitioning to securitization as they scale.

Funding structure directly impacts growth velocity and unit economics. Providers with efficient capital markets access can grow faster by recycling capital through securitization. Those dependent on equity funding face higher capital costs and slower growth. Successful providers diversify funding sources to optimize cost of capital and ensure growth continuity during market stress.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

What are the key success factors and pitfalls to avoid when entering the BNPL market?

Success in BNPL requires excellent underwriting technology, strategic partnerships, diversified revenue streams, and regulatory compliance, while avoiding over-reliance on late fees and under-pricing credit risk.

Critical Success Factors:

• Advanced Underwriting: AI-driven credit models analyzing 500+ data points per decision, maintaining default rates below 3% while achieving 80%+ approval rates. Investment in data science teams is essential for long-term profitability.
• Strategic Partnerships: Deep integrations with e-commerce platforms, POS systems, and payment gateways for distribution scale. Successful providers often have 50+ strategic partnerships driving merchant acquisition.
• Diversified Business Models: Expansion beyond consumer BNPL into B2B, white-label, or vertical-specific solutions. Single-model providers face higher competitive pressure and limited growth options.
• Efficient Capital Access: Multiple funding sources including warehouse facilities, securitization, and strategic partnerships. Capital-efficient providers can scale 2-3x faster than those dependent on equity funding.

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid:

• Over-reliance on Late Fees: Regulatory pressure is eliminating late fee revenue across major markets. Providers generating >20% revenue from late fees face significant regulatory risk.
• Under-pricing Credit Risk: Aggressive expansion without proper underwriting leads to elevated default rates exceeding 5-8%, destroying unit economics. Maintain strict loss rate targets.
• Insufficient Integration Depth: Shallow merchant integrations result in low adoption rates and poor merchant retention. Invest in seamless checkout experiences and merchant support.
• Ignoring Regulatory Evolution: BNPL regulation is rapidly evolving globally. Non-compliance can result in operational restrictions or market access loss. Maintain strong legal and compliance capabilities.

Conclusion

Sources

1. Equifax Beginners Guide to BNPL
2. Grant Thornton True Cost of BNPL
3. Klarna Q1 2025 Results
4. Affirm Q1 2025 Profitability Strategy
5. Arthur D. Little B2B BNPL Report 2025
6. Arttha BNPL Platform
7. Healthcare Dive Medical BNPL
8. Qlarifi Pre-Seed Funding
9. Australia BNPL Business Report 2025
10. CFPB BNPL Report 2025
11. Klarna Clover Partnership
12. Nexi Compass BNPL Partnership
13. Publicis Sapient Next Wave of BNPL