What are the revenue models for carbon capture?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the carbon capture market in a clean and beautiful presentation

Carbon capture revenue models have matured dramatically since 2023, creating multiple profitable pathways for entrepreneurs and investors.

Companies now generate revenue through service fees, equipment licensing, equity stakes in infrastructure, carbon credit sales, and product utilization. Government incentives like the US Section 45Q tax credit ($80-180/ton) and EU Innovation Fund support bankability, while corporate net-zero commitments drive steady demand for capture-as-a-service subscriptions.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

What kinds of businesses currently make money from carbon capture, and how exactly do they do it?

Four distinct business categories dominate carbon capture revenues today, each with proven monetization strategies.

Oil and gas service providers like SLB and Linde leverage existing infrastructure and expertise. SLB offers modular capture through Capturi™ systems, takes equity stakes in transport-and-storage hubs, and collects recurring tolls from pipeline usage. Linde licenses cryogenic capture systems, integrates capture into gas-supply contracts, and secures predictable cash flows through long-term take-or-pay agreements.

Pure-play capture equipment vendors focus on technology licensing and royalties. Capsol Technologies licenses post-combustion bolt-on units and collects royalties throughout plant operation cycles. Carbon Clean deploys proprietary solvent-based systems with revenue from equipment sales plus ongoing service contracts. These companies minimize capital requirements while building recurring revenue streams.

Direct air capture specialists operate subscription-based models targeting corporate buyers. Climeworks sells pay-per-ton DAC subscriptions to companies seeking verified carbon removal credits. Heirloom Carbon operates commercial DAC facilities and partners with concrete producers for CO₂ utilization revenue.

CCUS-as-a-service startups offer turnkey solutions under subscription models. Graphyte sells carbon-bricks from biomass-mineralization at under $100/ton with upfront corporate purchase orders. CREW Carbon and Airbuild provide modular sequestration systems through unit rentals and subscription services.

Who are the top startups and established companies in 2025 offering carbon capture solutions, and what's their revenue model?

Market leaders span established industrial giants and emerging pure-play specialists, each optimizing different revenue approaches for maximum scalability.

If you want to build on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Which carbon capture business models have proven the most profitable so far, and what are the main factors behind their success?

Three business models consistently generate the highest returns: integrated oil and gas operations, capture-as-a-service subscriptions, and technology licensing with royalties.

Integrated oil and gas models achieve superior profitability through vertical integration across the entire value chain. SLB and Linde capture equipment margins plus long-term transport-and-storage tolls, while equity stakes in infrastructure provide annuity-like cash flows. These companies leverage existing pipeline networks and storage expertise, reducing deployment costs by 30-50% compared to greenfield projects.

Capture-as-a-service models generate predictable recurring revenues through subscription fees and take-or-pay contracts. Climeworks' subscription model ensures steady cash flow backed by corporate net-zero commitments. Corporate buyers pre-pay for removal credits, providing upfront capital while guaranteeing future demand. This model achieves 60-80% gross margins on service fees.

Technology licensing minimizes capital requirements while building scalable royalty streams. Capsol and Carbon Clean earn 5-15% royalties on plant throughput without major capex investments. Royalty payments escalate with plant operation hours, creating automatic revenue growth as facilities mature.

Success factors include mature technology with proven reliability, access to favorable government incentives like Section 45Q tax credits, long-term contracts providing revenue certainty, integration with existing industrial infrastructure, and strong corporate offtake agreements backed by net-zero commitments.

Need a clear, elegant overview of a market? Browse our structured slide decks for a quick, visual deep dive.

How does selling carbon credits or offsets generate income, and what's the demand and price trend for those credits in 2025?

Carbon credit sales create revenue when companies capture CO₂ and issue verified removal credits that corporations purchase to meet net-zero targets.

The mechanism works through third-party verification: capture companies remove one ton of CO₂ and receive one tradeable credit. Corporations retire these credits against sustainability pledges, creating steady buyer demand. Registry platforms like Verra and Gold Standard handle verification and trading infrastructure.

Market size reached approximately 180 million credits retired in 2024, maintaining stable volumes versus 2023. Total registry issuances hit 305 million tCO₂e in 2024 with market value around $1.4 billion. However, significant price divergence exists based on credit quality and verification standards.

High-integrity removal credits ("A"-rated by quality frameworks) average $14.80 per ton, reflecting rigorous verification and permanent storage. Lower-quality reduction credits trade around $3.50 per ton due to additionality concerns. Premium forest and land-use credits reach $20 per ton in forward markets as buyers seek nature-based solutions.

Demand drivers include corporate net-zero targets covering 90% of Fortune 500 companies, regulatory disclosure pressure from SEC climate rules, and ICVCM integrity standards pushing quality premiums higher. Airlines, technology companies, and consumer brands represent the largest buyer segments.

What role do government incentives, subsidies, or tax credits play in making carbon capture financially viable?

Government incentives provide essential financial backing that transforms marginal carbon capture projects into bankable investments, often representing 40-60% of project economics.

Are there industries or sectors that pay for carbon capture services directly, and what value do they get in return?

Heavy industrial sectors with unavoidable emissions directly purchase capture services to avoid carbon pricing penalties and access premium markets.

Cement and steel manufacturers represent the largest direct-pay segment, purchasing capture services at their facilities to avoid EU ETS liabilities and secure "green" product premiums. These industries face carbon costs of $50-100 per ton under emissions trading systems, making capture services economically attractive when priced competitively.

Waste-to-energy and biomass plants pay for flue-gas capture to sell renewable energy credits and carbon credits simultaneously. These facilities generate negative emissions when capturing CO₂ from biogenic sources, creating additional revenue streams worth $10-20 per MWh on top of electricity sales.

Blue hydrogen and ammonia producers purchase capture services to meet low-carbon product standards required by industrial buyers. Hydrogen producers access premium pricing for "blue" hydrogen (with capture) versus "grey" hydrogen (without), typically commanding 20-30% price premiums in industrial gas markets.

Oil and gas operators pay transport and storage tolls for enhanced oil recovery projects, where CO₂ injection increases reservoir production by 10-25%. EOR operators generate additional barrel revenue that exceeds capture and transport costs.

The value proposition centers on avoiding carbon pricing penalties, accessing premium markets for low-carbon products, meeting regulatory compliance requirements, and monetizing environmental attributes through credit sales.

Wondering who's shaping this fast-moving industry? Our slides map out the top players and challengers in seconds.

If you want actionable data about this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Can captured carbon be turned into products (like building materials or fuels), and are those use cases generating revenue today?

CO₂ utilization creates additional revenue streams, though most remain in pilot or early commercial stages compared to storage services.

What infrastructure and upfront investment are typically needed to build a carbon capture venture, and what are the common funding options?

Carbon capture ventures require substantial upfront capital with typical investments ranging from $20 million for small industrial retrofits to $500 million for integrated transport and storage hubs.

Infrastructure costs break down into three main categories. Capture modules represent approximately 50% of total project capex, including compressors, solvents, and heat exchangers. Pipelines and transport-and-storage hubs account for 30% of costs, covering pipeline construction, injection wells, and monitoring systems. Compression, monitoring, and auxiliary systems comprise the remaining 20%, including power infrastructure and control systems.

Small-scale DAC plants require $50-200 million in capital, while industrial retrofit capture units need $20-100 million depending on facility size. Large transport-and-storage hubs demand $200-500 million for full development including pipeline networks and storage capacity.

Funding sources include multiple financing structures. Equity and project finance combine sponsor equity with ECA-backed debt from export credit agencies. Tax-equity partnerships monetize Section 45Q credits, providing immediate cash flow from future tax benefits. DOE grants and EU Innovation Fund allocations reduce capex requirements by 30-50% for qualifying projects.

Corporate offtake pre-payments provide upfront capital in exchange for future removal credits or captured CO₂. Green bonds offer asset-backed financing for sustainable infrastructure projects, typically at lower interest rates than conventional debt.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

How are carbon capture-as-a-service models (subscription or pay-per-ton) being implemented, and who is buying them?

Capture-as-a-service models provide turnkey carbon removal without requiring customers to own or operate capture equipment, generating predictable recurring revenues through subscription tiers and volume-based contracts.

Implementation varies by service provider and customer segment. Climeworks offers "Climeworks Leap" subscriptions with guaranteed annual removal quotas paid monthly or annually, targeting corporate sustainability programs. Graphyte and CREW Carbon structure volume-based contracts with airlines and enterprise customers, linking payments to actual tons captured and verified.

Service providers install and maintain capture equipment onsite or at centralized facilities, handling all operational complexity while customers pay per ton removed or via subscription tiers. Pricing typically ranges from $50-180 per ton depending on technology type, scale, and contract duration.

Primary buyers include technology giants like Microsoft and Apple seeking verified carbon removal for net-zero commitments. Airlines purchase removal services to offset unavoidable flight emissions under CORSIA regulations. Heavy industry companies use capture services to meet corporate sustainability targets and access premium markets for low-carbon products.

Financial services and consulting firms increasingly purchase removal subscriptions to offset operational emissions from business travel and office operations. Consumer brands leverage capture services for product carbon neutrality claims and marketing differentiation.

If you need to-the-point data on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What are the emerging carbon capture technologies or business models expected to grow significantly in 2026?

Four emerging technologies and business models show exceptional growth potential for 2026, driven by improved economics and market maturation.

Electrochemical CO₂ reduction technologies like those developed by CO2L Tech promise dramatically lower energy footprints compared to traditional thermal processes. These systems reduce energy requirements by 40-60%, making capture economically viable at smaller scales and industrial sites previously considered uneconomical.

AI-optimized sorbents and capture materials represent another breakthrough area. Companies like Meloon develop graphene-based sorbents that improve capture efficiency while reducing regeneration energy. AI optimization enables custom sorbent design for specific industrial applications, increasing capture rates by 20-30% over conventional materials.

Enhanced weathering and biochar integration create scalable mineralization pathways that permanently sequester CO₂ while improving agricultural productivity. These approaches generate revenue from both carbon credits and agricultural co-benefits, creating multiple value streams for project developers.

Hub-and-cluster merchant transport-and-storage networks enable shared infrastructure that reduces unit costs across multiple capture projects. Deloitte analysis shows these merchant models can reduce transport and storage costs by 30-50% compared to dedicated project infrastructure, making capture economical for smaller industrial facilities.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

Which revenue streams are recurring versus one-time, and what does that mean for long-term scalability?

Revenue stream predictability determines long-term scalability, with recurring models providing superior investment returns and financing access compared to one-time payments.

• Recurring Revenue Streams: Subscription fees from DAC services, transport and storage tolls, technology royalties, and service maintenance contracts provide predictable cash flows that support debt financing and higher valuations.
• One-Time Revenue Streams: Equipment sales, carbon credit retirements, and upfront offtake payments generate capital infusions but create revenue volatility that complicates long-term planning.

Recurring models achieve higher scalability through predictable cash flows that enable debt financing at 60-70% debt-to-equity ratios. Subscription revenues grow automatically as customer bases expand, while royalty streams increase with plant utilization rates. These characteristics support premium valuations of 15-25x EBITDA for established service providers.

One-time revenues provide essential early-stage capital but require continuous customer acquisition to maintain growth. Equipment sales companies face quarterly revenue volatility and typically achieve lower valuations of 8-12x EBITDA due to project-dependent cash flows.

Successful companies blend both revenue types, using equipment sales or upfront offtake payments to fund initial deployment while building recurring service contracts for long-term stability. This hybrid approach maximizes both growth capital and valuation multiples.

What are the biggest risks or regulatory barriers that could impact revenue for carbon capture ventures in the near future?

Five critical risk categories could significantly impact carbon capture revenues, requiring careful mitigation strategies for successful ventures.

Policy uncertainty represents the largest near-term risk. Section 45Q tax credit extensions beyond 2032 remain uncertain, potentially eliminating 40-60% of project economics for US ventures. EU ETS price volatility creates revenue unpredictability for European projects, while carbon pricing policy changes in key markets could disrupt long-term contracts.

Permitting delays pose operational risks that can delay revenue generation by 12-24 months. EPA Class VI well permits for CO₂ storage require extensive environmental review, while pipeline permitting faces increasing local opposition. State-level permitting requirements vary significantly, creating regulatory complexity for multi-state projects.

Long-term liability and monitoring frameworks remain undefined in many jurisdictions. Post-closure liability for stored CO₂ could create unfunded obligations that impact project economics. Insurance markets for CO₂ storage remain immature, potentially leaving operators with unhedged liability exposure.

Carbon pricing volatility affects both compliance and voluntary markets. Voluntary carbon credit prices show 200-300% volatility based on integrity concerns and market sentiment. Compliance markets face price ceiling and floor mechanisms that could limit upside revenue potential.

Additionality and integrity concerns threaten carbon credit revenue streams. Over-crediting controversies and verification disputes could devalue existing credit inventories. Regulatory changes to credit standards could retroactively impact project revenues and require expensive re-verification processes.

Conclusion

Sources

1. Carbon Capture Stocks - Exoswan
2. Top 10 Leading Carbon Capture Companies - Energy Digital
3. Carbon Credit Price Prediction - Bitget
4. Carbon Capture Startups - Climate Insider
5. Carbon Capture Utilization Storage Startups - StartUs Insights
6. Carbon Capture and Storage Startups - Enterprise League
7. Top 20 Direct Air Capture Companies - Carbon Herald
8. Carbon Credits Market 2024-2025 - Carbon Credits
9. Voluntary Carbon Market Update - Regreener
10. State of Voluntary Carbon Market 2025 - Ecosystem Marketplace
11. Climate Tech Startups - StartUs Insights
12. Top Carbon Capture Storage Startups Energy Sector - StartUs Insights
13. CCS Seeking Bankable Business Model - Deloitte