What are the investment opportunities in carbon capture and storage technologies?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the carbon capture and storage market in a clean and beautiful presentation

Carbon capture and storage represents one of the most capital-intensive yet promising decarbonization sectors, with over $22 billion in North American startup funding through mid-2025.

The technology addresses the critical gap in net-zero transitions for hard-to-abate industries like cement, steel, and power generation, where alternative solutions remain technically or economically unfeasible.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

What exactly is carbon capture and storage (CCS) and how does it work in practice?

CCS operates through three interconnected stages: CO₂ separation from industrial emissions or atmosphere, compression and transport via pipelines or ships, and permanent geological storage or conversion into valuable products.

The capture stage employs post-combustion methods using amine solvents that chemically bind CO₂ from flue gases, pre-combustion gasification that removes CO₂ before fuel burning, or oxyfuel combustion in pure oxygen environments. Direct air capture (DAC) extends this to atmospheric CO₂ using large-scale fans and specialized sorbents, while bioenergy with CCS (BECCS) captures emissions from biomass combustion for net-negative emissions.

Transport infrastructure typically involves high-pressure pipelines operating at 100-200 bar, though ship transport enables cross-border movement to optimal storage sites. The London Protocol's recent ratification allows international CO₂ transport, opening access to regions with superior geological formations like the North Sea or Gulf of Mexico.

Storage occurs in deep saline aquifers (1-3 km underground), depleted oil and gas reservoirs, or unmineable coal seams, with CO₂ forming supercritical fluid that remains permanently trapped through caprock sealing and mineral carbonation over decades. Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) provides early revenue streams by injecting CO₂ to extract additional petroleum, subsidizing capture costs during market development phases.

Utilization pathways convert captured CO₂ into chemicals, fuels, concrete, and carbon fiber through electrochemical, thermochemical, or biological processes, creating revenue streams beyond storage while addressing carbon circularity in industrial supply chains.

Which segments of the CCS value chain are currently the most attractive for investment?

Capture technologies offer the highest investment returns due to intense R&D competition and margin expansion potential as costs decline from $600-800/ton to projected $150-300/ton by 2030.

Direct air capture represents the fastest-growing subsegment, with companies like Aircapture ($50M Series A) and CarbonCapture Inc. ($80M Series A) developing modular units that reduce deployment timeframes from years to months. These systems address the retrofit challenge for existing facilities while enabling point-of-source deployment without major infrastructure modifications.

Transport infrastructure provides medium-risk returns through master limited partnerships (MLPs) and regulated asset base (RAB) models, particularly in regions with supportive policy frameworks. The UK's Track 2 cluster program guarantees government-backed returns for integrated transport networks, while EU CEF-E funding reduces development risk for cross-border pipelines.

Storage assets deliver stable, utility-like returns in jurisdictions with clear liability frameworks and government guarantees for long-term integrity. Denmark's CCUS Fund allocates DKK 815M annually specifically for storage projects, while Australia's CCUS Development Fund provides AUD 0.5-25M grants per project with streamlined permitting processes.

Need a clear, elegant overview of a market? Browse our structured slide decks for a quick, visual deep dive.

If you want fresh and clear data on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Who are the leading companies and startups in the CCS space, and what are their specific business models?

The CCS landscape divides between established oil & gas majors leveraging existing infrastructure and agile pure-play innovators targeting breakthrough technologies.

What problems are these companies solving in traditional carbon management?

Traditional carbon management suffers from prohibitive costs, infrastructure gaps, and deployment complexity that innovative CCS companies address through modular solutions and digital optimization.

Legacy centralized hub models require massive upfront capital ($1-5 billion) and 5-10 year development timelines, creating barriers for smaller emitters and retrofit applications. Startups like CarbonCapture Inc. and Aircapture solve this through factory-manufactured modular units deployable in 6-12 months, reducing entry barriers and enabling distributed capture networks.

Energy intensity represents another critical inefficiency, with first-generation amine scrubbing consuming 25-35% of plant output for CO₂ separation. Advanced materials companies develop next-generation solvents, membranes, and solid sorbents reducing energy penalties to 15-20%, while geothermal-integrated systems like Octavia Carbon eliminate grid electricity requirements entirely.

Infrastructure bottlenecks limit deployment in regions without existing pipeline networks or geological storage access. Companies address this through ship-based transport enabling global storage access, while CCS-as-a-Service models aggregate dispersed emitters to achieve hub economics without individual infrastructure investments.

Monitoring and verification challenges create liability concerns for long-term storage integrity. Digital solutions using satellite monitoring, subsurface sensors, and AI-driven reservoir modeling provide real-time CO₂ plume tracking, reducing insurance costs and enabling performance-based contracts with guaranteed permanence verification.

Are there public or private investment vehicles available, and what are typical requirements?

CCS investment vehicles span traditional infrastructure funds, tax-advantaged partnerships, government co-investment programs, and emerging climate-focused funds with varying entry requirements and risk profiles.

• Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs): Tax-advantaged structures for pipeline and storage assets requiring $5-25M minimum investments, suitable for institutional investors seeking stable cash flows
• Infrastructure Debt Funds: Senior debt financing for construction phases with 7-12% target returns, typically requiring anchor offtake agreements and government guarantees
• Private Equity Growth Funds: Equity investments in capture technology companies seeking 20-30% IRRs, focusing on proven pilots and contracted revenue streams
• Climate Tech VC Funds: Early-stage investments in breakthrough technologies with $1-10M checks, targeting disruptive approaches to traditional capture methods
• Government Co-Investment Programs: Matching funds for private investors through programs like Denmark's CCUS Fund or Australia's CCUS Development Fund, reducing risk through public-private partnerships

Typical requirements include minimum equity contributions (20-40% of project costs), anchor customer offtake agreements spanning 10-20 years, environmental permitting completion, and demonstrated technology performance at pilot or demonstration scale. Government grant applications often require local content commitments and community engagement protocols.

What were the major fundraising rounds in 2025, and who were the key investors?

2025 marked a pivotal year for CCS fundraising with over $22 billion in North American startup funding and several breakthrough Series A rounds demonstrating investor confidence in scalable technologies.

CarbonCapture Inc. led funding activity with an $80M Series A from Prime Movers Lab, Amazon Climate Pledge Fund, Aramco Ventures, and Siemens, validating modular DAC manufacturing approaches. Aircapture secured $50M from Sumeru Ventures for rapid deployment of containerized capture units targeting industrial sites worldwide.

Captura raised $22M from Aramco Ventures and Equinor Ventures for ocean mineralization technology that captures CO₂ directly from seawater, representing a novel approach beyond traditional atmospheric or point-source methods. Mission Zero Technologies closed a $28M Series A from Siemens Ventures specifically for geothermal-integrated DAC systems reducing operational energy requirements.

Corporate venture arms dominated investor participation, with Amazon Climate Pledge Fund, Aramco Ventures, Equinor Ventures, and Siemens Ventures providing strategic partnerships alongside capital. Climate-focused funds like Prime Movers Lab and Idealab X led technical due diligence, while global infrastructure investors including Santander and DNV participated in larger rounds.

Wondering who's shaping this fast-moving industry? Our slides map out the top players and challengers in seconds.

If you need to-the-point data on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What policy incentives are shaping CCS investment profitability?

Policy incentives create the fundamental economics enabling CCS investment returns through tax credits, direct subsidies, and regulated revenue models that de-risk long-term capital deployment.

The US Section 45Q tax credit provides $85/ton for utilization and $180/ton for geological storage, recently enhanced by the Inflation Reduction Act with direct pay provisions enabling tax-exempt entities to monetize credits immediately. Combined with state-level low-carbon fuel standards, projects achieve $200-300/ton total value stacks in California and other progressive states.

European Union CEF-E funding allocated €600M in 2025 specifically for CO₂ transport and storage Projects of Common Interest (PCIs), covering up to 50% of development costs for cross-border infrastructure. The EU Innovation Fund provides additional grant funding for first-of-kind commercial demonstrations, reducing technology risk for early movers.

The UK's regulated asset base (RAB) model guarantees government-backed returns for integrated cluster development, similar to utility regulation enabling long-term infrastructure investment with predictable cash flows. Track 2 cluster programs provide coordinated support across capture, transport, and storage elements through single regulatory frameworks.

Denmark's CCUS Fund allocates DKK 815M annually through competitive tenders for both fossil and biogenic CO₂ capture, targeting 0.9 Mt CO₂/year reductions by 2030. Australia's CCUS Development Fund provides AUD 0.5-25M grants per project with streamlined environmental approvals and accelerated permitting timelines.

Which industries are demanding CCS solutions most, and how are partnerships structured?

Power generation, cement, steel, and hydrogen production drive CCS demand through regulatory requirements and corporate net-zero commitments, with partnership structures evolving toward integrated service models reducing customer risk.

Coal and natural gas power plants represent the largest addressable market, with existing facilities retrofitting post-combustion capture to maintain grid reliability during renewable transitions. Partnerships typically involve 15-20 year capture service agreements where CCS providers own and operate equipment while utilities pay per ton removed, transferring technology and operational risk.

Cement and steel industries face process emissions impossible to eliminate through fuel switching, making CCS essential for decarbonization. Hub-and-cluster models aggregate multiple industrial emitters sharing transport and storage infrastructure, reducing per-ton costs through economies of scale while enabling smaller facilities to access CCS without individual infrastructure investments.

Blue hydrogen production integrates CCS directly into steam methane reforming processes, capturing 90-95% of process CO₂ to achieve low-carbon fuel certification. Partnerships structure around hydrogen offtake agreements linking CCS costs to fuel pricing, enabling cost pass-through to end users in transportation and industrial applications.

Natural gas processing facilities increasingly adopt CCS for CO₂ purification streams, leveraging existing infrastructure and operational expertise. Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) partnerships provide early revenue streams by monetizing captured CO₂ for petroleum extraction, subsidizing capture costs during market development phases before standalone storage becomes economically viable.

What are the main technological bottlenecks and how are they being addressed?

CCS faces three critical bottlenecks: energy-intensive capture processes, infrastructure scaling challenges, and integration complexity across value chain segments.

Capture energy penalties consume 25-35% of facility output in first-generation systems, creating prohibitive operational costs that advanced materials research addresses through next-generation solvents, membranes, and solid sorbents. Companies like Carbon Clean develop proprietary solvents reducing regeneration energy to 2.2 GJ/ton CO₂ compared to 3.5-4.0 GJ/ton for conventional amines.

Infrastructure scaling requires coordinated development across capture, transport, and storage segments with different investment timelines and risk profiles. Hub-and-cluster models solve this through shared infrastructure enabling multiple emitters to connect to centralized transport and storage networks, reducing individual project risk while achieving economies of scale.

Digital monitoring technologies address storage integrity concerns through real-time satellite monitoring, subsurface sensor networks, and AI-driven reservoir modeling providing continuous verification of CO₂ plume behavior. These systems enable performance-based contracts with guaranteed permanence, reducing liability concerns and insurance costs for long-term storage projects.

Modular manufacturing approaches pioneered by CarbonCapture Inc. and Aircapture solve deployment bottlenecks through factory-built systems deployable in 6-12 months versus 3-5 years for custom installations. Standardized designs enable mass production cost reductions while reducing project development risk through proven performance data.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

If you want to build or invest on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What are the projected growth trends and game-changing developments expected through 2026?

CCS capacity is projected to quadruple by 2030 driven by policy support and industrial demand, with capture costs declining 30-40% through technological advances and manufacturing scale.

Over 700 global CCS projects are in various development stages, with significant Final Investment Decisions (FIDs) expected for Europe's Aramis cluster, Hynet network, and US Midwest ethanol facilities through 2026. Northern Lights Phase 2 expansion will triple European storage capacity to 15 Mt CO₂/year, enabling cross-border transport from Germany, Belgium, and Denmark.

Direct air capture represents the fastest growth segment, with deployment costs declining from $600-800/ton to projected $150-300/ton by 2030 through modular manufacturing and renewable energy integration. Geothermal-powered systems eliminate grid electricity requirements while ocean-based capture accesses unlimited atmospheric interface areas.

Cross-border CO₂ transport will accelerate following London Protocol ratification, enabling optimal matching of capture sources with geological storage sites across national boundaries. Ship-based transport opens access to North Sea storage for Asian and North American emitters, while pipeline networks connect industrial clusters to regional storage hubs.

Digital monitoring and verification systems will enable performance-based contracts with real-time permanence verification, reducing insurance costs and liability concerns for long-term storage integrity. Blockchain-based carbon credit systems provide transparent tracking from capture through permanent sequestration, supporting premium pricing for verified removals.

Are there emerging markets particularly ripe for CCS deployment?

Asia-Pacific, North Sea clusters, and North American industrial corridors offer the most attractive near-term deployment opportunities due to policy support, industrial concentration, and geological advantages.

China's coal power sector represents the largest addressable market with over 1,000 GW of generation capacity requiring retrofit solutions for carbon neutrality by 2060. Government mandates for demonstration projects and preferential financing create early mover advantages for proven technologies, while domestic manufacturing capabilities enable rapid scaling.

The North Sea cluster spanning UK, Netherlands, Denmark, and Norway leverages depleted oil and gas reservoirs for storage while existing offshore infrastructure reduces development costs. Northern Lights, Porthos, and Greensand projects provide shared storage access for multiple countries, while government co-investment reduces private investor risk through public-private partnerships.

North American ethanol and natural gas processing facilities offer immediate applications with existing CO₂ streams requiring minimal capture modifications. Midwest clusters benefit from enhanced oil recovery monetization in the Permian Basin, while California's low-carbon fuel standard provides additional revenue streams for transportation fuel applications.

Latin America's offshore oil fields provide extensive storage capacity with Petrobras leading Brazil's CCS development program. Existing subsea infrastructure and regulatory frameworks accelerate project development while regional industrial demand from petrochemicals and cement creates integrated value chains.

What are the most actionable next steps for entering this space in the next 6-12 months?

Success in CCS requires strategic positioning across technology development, policy engagement, and partnership formation with established players possessing infrastructure and regulatory expertise.

For investors, target pure-play capture technology companies with proven pilot operations and contracted offtake agreements, focusing on modular approaches enabling rapid deployment and cost reduction through manufacturing scale. Co-invest in infrastructure funds benefiting from regulated asset base models in the UK and EU, while leveraging US 45Q tax credits through direct pay provisions for immediate value realization.

Entrepreneurs should develop modular capture solutions addressing point-of-source applications for industrial retrofit markets, forming CCS-as-a-Service consortia that aggregate dispersed emitters and partner with transport/storage specialists to share development risk. Engage with policy makers through grant applications including EU CEF-E calls, US DOE demonstration programs, and national subsidy funds in Denmark and Australia.

Both investors and entrepreneurs must prioritize partnerships with established utilities, oil & gas majors, and chemical companies providing offtake agreements, engineering expertise, and regulatory navigation capabilities. Early participation in government-backed demonstration projects and industrial clusters will provide proof-of-concept validation enabling broader commercial scaling.

Focus on regions with supportive policy frameworks including the US Inflation Reduction Act, EU Green Deal funding, and national CCUS strategies providing clear revenue mechanisms and risk mitigation. Target sectors with immediate compliance requirements including power generation, cement, steel, and hydrogen production where CCS provides the only viable decarbonization pathway.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

Conclusion

Sources

1. Global CCS Institute: CCS Explained – The Basics
2. National Grid: What is CCS & How It Works
3. Columbia Threadneedle: CCS Value-Chain Investment Opportunities
4. Intellectual Market Insights: Leading CCS Companies 2025
5. Global CCS Institute: CCS Technologies Compendium 2024
6. Renewable Carbon News: CarbonCapture $80M Series A
7. Carbon Credits: Aircapture $50M Series A
8. GreyB: Octavia Carbon Startup Profile
9. DNV: CCS Investment to Top $80B Next 5 Years
10. Alt Energy Mag: $22.37 Billion in Carbon Capture Funding
11. EFI Foundation: Section 45Q Tax Credit Analysis
12. Global CCS Institute: EU CEF-E €600M Funding Call
13. Danish Energy Agency: CCUS Fund
14. Australian Government: CCUS Development Fund
15. Research and Markets: Global CCS Market Analysis
16. Power Magazine: Carbon Capture in Power Industry
17. WBCSD: CCS-as-a-Service Models
18. ING: Carbon Capture Storage Outlook 2025