What are the newest carbon capture technologies?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the carbon capture market in a clean and beautiful presentation

The carbon capture market is experiencing a technological revolution in 2025, with breakthrough innovations achieving 99% CO₂ removal rates while cutting costs by up to 30%.

Advanced materials like AI-designed metal-organic frameworks and graphene nanofiltration are replacing energy-intensive traditional methods, while electrochemical systems are enabling modular direct air capture deployment. Leading startups have raised over $150 million in funding this year, targeting specific pain points in energy consumption, operational stability, and capital costs that have hindered previous carbon capture approaches.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

Summary

The newest carbon capture technologies introduced in 2025 focus on solving energy intensity and cost barriers that have limited traditional amine-based systems. These innovations range from AI-discovered MOFs achieving 99% capture rates to electrochemical DAC systems cutting operational complexity, with leading startups collectively raising hundreds of millions in investment.

Technology Company/Developer Cost per Ton Development Stage Key Innovation
AI-Designed MOF Filtration Various research labs $39/t CO₂ Lab testing 99.1% CO₂ removal with 17% lower energy penalty
Nanofiltration Membranes MIT researchers $450/t CO₂ Lab validation Graphene-based separation cutting costs by 30%
Electrochemical DAC Spiritus, Mission Zero $250-600/t CO₂ Pilot phase Low-temperature regeneration, modular design
Fluidized-Particle DAC Airhive Not disclosed Pilot phase Mineral sorbents with fully electrified process
Enhanced Rock Weathering CREW Carbon, Everest Carbon $50-100/t CO₂ Field trials Agricultural integration with soil health benefits
Graphene Membrane Separation Meloon Not disclosed Lab scale Single-atom-thick filters for flue gas separation
Electrochemical Mineralization Mission Zero Technologies Not disclosed Pilot phase Direct conversion to solid carbonates

Get a Clear, Visual
Overview of This Market

We've already structured this market in a clean, concise, and up-to-date presentation. If you don't have time to waste digging around, download it now.

DOWNLOAD THE DECK

What exactly are the newest carbon capture technologies introduced in 2025?

The breakthrough technologies emerging in 2025 center on advanced materials and electrochemical processes that fundamentally redesign how CO₂ is captured and processed.

AI-designed metal-organic frameworks represent the most significant lab-scale advancement, using machine learning to discover MOF structures that achieve 99.1% CO₂ removal while reducing energy penalties by 17% compared to traditional amine scrubbing. These filtration modules target the core inefficiency of current solvent-based systems.

Graphene-based nanofiltration membranes have emerged as another game-changing approach, separating carbonate and hydroxide ions at the molecular level to cut capture costs to approximately $450 per ton of CO₂—a 30% reduction from conventional thermal carbonate looping methods. MIT researchers have validated these membrane units in controlled laboratory conditions.

Electrochemical direct air capture systems, exemplified by companies like Spiritus and Mission Zero Technologies, eliminate the need for high-temperature regeneration by using solid-sorbent electrochemical cells that can be regenerated at low temperatures. These modular, fan-less DAC units address the high capital and operational costs that have limited traditional DAC deployment.

Fluidized-particle DAC technology, developed by companies like Airhive, uses mineral sorbents that are fluidized in reactors with cyclic calcination to release CO₂, creating a fully electrified process that can be powered entirely by renewable energy sources.

Which of these technologies are considered disruptive and what existing methods do they aim to replace?

The most disruptive technologies directly target the energy-intensive and chemically unstable aspects of current amine-based and thermal regeneration systems.

Disruptive Technology Target Legacy Method Primary Limitation Addressed Disruption Mechanism
AI-Designed MOFs Amine scrubbing towers High energy use and solvent degradation Solid-state filtration eliminating liquid solvents
Nanofiltration Membranes High-temperature caustic looping Thermal regeneration energy penalty Room-temperature ion separation
Electrochemical DAC Fan-driven sorbent systems Complex mechanical equipment and high CAPEX Passive electrochemical regeneration
Fluidized-Particle Systems Fixed-bed vacuum swing adsorption Low sorbent contact area and pressure drops Continuous fluidization maximizing surface contact
Enhanced Rock Weathering Traditional reforestation Slow kinetics and land-use constraints Accelerated mineral weathering with agricultural integration
Graphene Membranes Multi-stage compression separation Energy-intensive pressure differentials Single-atom selective permeability
Direct Mineralization Geological storage transport Transport costs and storage uncertainty On-site conversion to stable solid carbonates
Carbon Capture Market pain points

If you want useful data about this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What specific pain points are these new solutions addressing?

Current carbon capture systems face four critical bottlenecks that these new technologies specifically target with measurable improvements.

Energy intensity represents the primary economic barrier, with traditional amine-based systems requiring over 3.5 GJ per ton of CO₂ captured. New solvents and membrane technologies reduce this to 1.9-2.5 GJ per ton, translating to operational cost reductions of 30-45%. This energy reduction directly impacts the economic viability of large-scale deployment.

Operational stability under fluctuating industrial conditions has limited real-world performance of existing systems. Nanofiltration membranes buffer ion concentrations, enabling robust operation under varying flue gas compositions and temperatures that typically degrade amine solvents. This stability reduces maintenance costs and improves uptime from typical 60-70% to projected 85-90%.

Capital cost barriers have restricted deployment to only the largest industrial facilities. Modular electrochemical and fluidized systems reduce upfront investment by eliminating complex towers, pumps, and heat exchangers. These designs enable deployment at mid-scale facilities (50,000-200,000 tons CO₂/year) that were previously uneconomical to retrofit.

Land and water usage constraints limit deployment options for both point-source and direct air capture systems. Enhanced weathering integrates carbon removal with agricultural operations, improving soil health while sequestering CO₂, addressing the dual-use requirement that makes projects economically viable for farmers.

Need a clear, elegant overview of a market? Browse our structured slide decks for a quick, visual deep dive.

Which startups and companies are leading development of these emerging technologies?

The competitive landscape features a mix of well-funded startups and technology developers at various stages, with over $150 million raised collectively in 2025.

Company Core Technology 2025 Funding Key Investors Strategic Focus
Spiritus Passive electrochemical DAC $30M Series A Aramco Ventures, Mitsubishi Heavy, TDK Modular DAC deployment with industrial partnerships
Mission Zero Technologies Electrochemical mineralization $27.6M Series A Fortescue, Siemens, BEV Point-source capture with direct mineralization
Terradote Bio-based CO₂ materials $58.2M Series A Undisclosed Carbon utilization in construction materials
Noya Modular renewable-powered DAC $11M Series A Union Square, Collaborative Fund Distributed DAC with cooling system integration
Sirona Technologies Chemical-filtration DAC $6M seed Frontier (Stripe climate fund) Industrial-scale filtration systems
ZeoDac Zeolite molecular sieve DAC $4M seed Global Brain, Coca-Cola Consumer brand integration for offset programs
Parallel Carbon Mineral-electrochemical DAC $3.6M seed Aramco Ventures Oil & gas sector integration for enhanced recovery

The Market Pitch
Without the Noise

We have prepared a clean, beautiful and structured summary of this market, ideal if you want to get smart fast, or present it clearly.

DOWNLOAD

What stage of development is each major solution in currently?

The development pipeline shows clear segmentation between laboratory breakthroughs, pilot deployments, and early commercial phases, with most advanced solutions now transitioning from lab to pilot scale.

Laboratory testing dominates the most innovative approaches, including AI-designed MOFs, graphene nanofiltration membranes, and single-atom graphene filters. These technologies have demonstrated technical feasibility but require 12-18 months of pilot testing to validate performance under real-world conditions and contamination levels.

Pilot phase deployments are actively operating for electrochemical DAC systems by Spiritus and Mission Zero Technologies, fluidized DAC units by Airhive, and waste-to-energy carbon capture by Encyclis and Enfinium. These pilot projects typically run 6-24 months with capacities of 1-100 tons CO₂ per day, providing crucial data for commercial scale-up.

Early commercial deployment has begun with Noya's modular DAC units selling verified carbon removal credits, representing the first revenue-generating installations of next-generation technology. Heirloom Carbon has commissioned the first commercial DAC facility with 1,000 tons annual capacity, marking the transition from demonstration to market deployment.

Enhanced rock weathering projects by CREW Carbon and Everest Carbon are conducting field trials on agricultural land, testing both carbon sequestration rates and soil health impacts across different geological conditions and crop types.

What technical and economic barriers still need to be overcome for scaling?

Four critical barriers remain between current pilot projects and commercial scale deployment, each requiring specific technological and infrastructure solutions.

Material durability under real-world conditions represents the primary technical risk, particularly for MOFs and graphene membranes exposed to flue gas contaminants like sulfur compounds, particulates, and moisture. Long-term stability testing beyond laboratory conditions requires validation across diverse industrial environments to ensure 5-10 year operational lifespans expected by industrial buyers.

Regeneration energy optimization remains crucial for electrochemical and nanofiltration systems to achieve target operational costs below $200 per ton CO₂. Current systems achieve 20-40% energy reductions but need further optimization to reach the 50-60% reductions required for broad industrial adoption.

Infrastructure gaps in CO₂ transport and storage limit deployment options and increase costs by 200-300% in regions without pipeline access. Shared CO₂ pipeline networks and storage hubs must expand significantly to reduce transport costs by two-thirds, enabling economic deployment beyond major industrial clusters.

Regulatory and measurement standards for carbon removal credits lack consistency across jurisdictions, creating investment uncertainty. Standardized MRV (measurement, reporting, verification) protocols are essential for carbon credit markets and investor confidence in scaling deployment.

Wondering who's shaping this fast-moving industry? Our slides map out the top players and challengers in seconds.

Carbon Capture Market companies startups

If you need to-the-point data on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

How much funding have the most promising startups received in 2025?

Investment activity in 2025 shows strong institutional backing with over $150 million in disclosed funding across key players, indicating serious commercial interest from strategic investors.

Terradote leads with $58.2 million in Series A funding for bio-based CO₂ materials, though investor details remain undisclosed. This substantial round reflects the significant capital requirements for developing integrated carbon utilization facilities and the potential market size for carbon-derived construction materials.

Spiritus raised $30 million in Series A funding from industrial strategic investors including Aramco Ventures, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, and TDK, demonstrating strong interest from energy and technology companies seeking to integrate passive electrochemical DAC into their operations.

Mission Zero Technologies secured $27.6 million in Series A funding from Fortescue, Siemens, and BEV, targeting electrochemical mineralization technology that appeals to mining and industrial automation companies for its direct conversion of CO₂ to solid carbonates.

Early-stage companies are also attracting significant seed funding, with Noya raising $11 million, ZeoDac securing $4 million with backing from Coca-Cola for consumer offset programs, and Oxylus Energy obtaining $4.5 million for undisclosed technology development.

Strategic investor participation shows clear sector alignment, with oil companies (Aramco), industrial conglomerates (Mitsubishi, Siemens), and consumer brands (Coca-Cola) actively backing technologies that align with their operational needs and sustainability commitments.

What were the major breakthroughs in the past 12 months?

Four fundamental breakthroughs have emerged that address core limitations of previous carbon capture approaches, marking 2025 as a pivotal year for the industry.

MOF-based filtration achieving 99.1% CO₂ removal represents the highest capture efficiency demonstrated for solid-state systems, surpassing traditional amine solutions while reducing energy penalties by 17%. This breakthrough eliminates the solvent degradation issues that have limited the operational lifespan of liquid-based systems.

Graphene nanofiltration technology lowering costs to approximately $450 per ton CO₂ with 95% separation efficiency marks the first room-temperature separation process competitive with thermal regeneration methods. This advance removes the high-temperature energy requirement that has been the primary cost driver in traditional systems.

Electrochemical mineralization of CO₂ into solid carbonates at pilot scale eliminates the need for geological storage transport, converting CO₂ directly into stable solid materials on-site. This breakthrough addresses both storage uncertainty and transport costs that have limited deployment in regions without pipeline infrastructure.

Large-scale DAC deployment infrastructure reached a tipping point with Texas facilities planned for 500,000 tons annual capacity in 2025, representing a 13-fold increase in global DAC capacity. This scale-up demonstrates the industrial readiness of modular DAC technology for commercial deployment.

What are the cost metrics per ton of CO₂ captured for each leading technology?

Cost competitiveness varies significantly across technologies, with some approaches achieving breakthrough economics while others remain in early development phases.

Technology Cost (USD/t CO₂) Traditional Benchmark Cost Components
AI-MOF Filtration $39 $46 (amine scrubbing) Energy and material replacement only
Enhanced Rock Weathering $50-100 N/A (new category) Rock grinding, transport, field application
Electrochemical DAC $250-600 $600+ (thermal DAC) Electricity, equipment depreciation, maintenance
Nanofiltration Membranes $450 (energy only) N/A (new process) Energy cost excluding capital equipment
Fluidized-Particle DAC Not disclosed $600+ (conventional DAC) Under commercial development
Graphene Membrane Separation Not disclosed $80-120 (post-combustion) Laboratory phase, no commercial data
Direct Mineralization Not disclosed $50-80 (geological storage) Pilot phase, includes storage value

We've Already Mapped This Market

From key figures to models and players, everything's already in one structured and beautiful deck, ready to download.

DOWNLOAD
Carbon Capture Market business models

If you want to build or invest on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Which sectors are seeing the most traction with these new solutions?

Deployment patterns show clear sector preferences based on technical fit and economic drivers, with cement and steel leading point-source applications while direct air capture scales independently.

Cement and steel industries are adopting point-source MOF and nanofiltration retrofits due to high CO₂ concentrations (15-30%) in their flue gases, making capture more economical than dilute air processing. These sectors also face regulatory pressure from carbon border adjustment mechanisms (CBAM) in the EU and EPA regulations, creating compliance-driven demand.

Direct air capture deployment is accelerating through modular systems by Spiritus, Noya, and Sirona Technologies, targeting distributed deployment near renewable energy sources rather than centralized mega-projects. This approach reduces grid infrastructure requirements and enables flexible siting for optimal economics.

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is gaining traction through energy-from-waste pilots by Encyclis and Enfinium, and biomass-derived carbon materials by companies like Graphyte. These applications benefit from concentrated CO₂ streams and potential revenue from both energy production and carbon credits.

Construction materials sector shows increasing adoption of carbon-cured concrete by companies like Carbonaide and mineralized aggregates by Blue Skies, driven by both carbon sequestration value and improved material properties that command premium pricing from developers seeking green building certification.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

What are the most likely trends and deployments to expect in 2026?

Three major deployment waves are expected to accelerate in 2026 based on current pilot project timelines and investment commitments.

Commercial DAC rollouts will transition from single 1,000-ton annual facilities to multi-kiloton modular deployments, with several companies planning 5,000-10,000 ton annual capacity installations. This scale-up reflects improved economics and operational experience from 2025 pilot projects.

Carbon hub expansion will begin with the first shared pipeline networks operational in the North Sea through the Northern Lights project and US Midwest through DOE-funded infrastructure. These hubs reduce individual project transport costs by 60-70%, enabling deployment at medium-scale industrial facilities.

Integrated CCUS in refineries and cement plants will advance from pilot testing to early commercial agreements for MOF-based and electrochemical modules. Regulatory drivers including CBAM compliance and EPA requirements create predictable demand for these retrofits.

Enhanced weathering projects will scale from research trials to commercial deployment on agricultural land, with initial deployments targeting 10,000-50,000 acre projects that integrate carbon removal with soil health improvement for participating farmers.

What is the five-year outlook for scalability, market size, adoption, and emissions impact?

The 2030 outlook projects dramatic scaling across all metrics, though infrastructure development and cost reduction remain critical success factors.

Scalability projections show global capture capacity reaching approximately 430 million tons CO₂ annually by 2030, compared to roughly 50 million tons currently operational. Storage capacity is expected to reach 670 million tons annually, providing adequate infrastructure for projected capture growth. This scale-up requires successful deployment of modular technologies and shared infrastructure networks.

Market size forecasts indicate the CCUS market reaching $10 billion annually by 2030, growing at approximately 19.5% compound annual growth rate. This growth reflects both increasing deployment scale and declining unit costs as technologies mature and achieve economies of scale.

Industry adoption will accelerate through mandatory capture targets in cement and steel sectors under EU CBAM regulations and EPA rules, creating predictable demand for retrofit technologies. Major oil companies and utilities are expected to deploy DAC as part of net-zero commitments, providing anchor demand for emerging technologies.

Emissions impact potential reaches 1-2 gigatons CO₂ removal annually by 2030, contributing approximately 10% of the emission reductions needed for global net-zero targets. This impact requires successful scaling of both point-source capture in heavy industry and direct air capture deployment near renewable energy sources.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

Conclusion

Sources

  1. Energies Media - Breakthrough Carbon Capture Technology
  2. SciTech Daily - MIT Breakthrough Makes Carbon Capture More Efficient
  3. Global Venturing - Direct Air Capture Startups
  4. StartUs Insights - Carbon Capture Startups Guide
  5. Encyclis - Carbon Capture Programme Progress
  6. Enfinium - Carbon Capture Technology Programme
  7. IEA - CCUS Projects Reaching New Milestones
  8. New Scientist - Direct CO2 Capture Scale Up
Back to blog