What's new in carbon capture technology?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the carbon capture market in a clean and beautiful presentation

Carbon capture technology has reached a transformative inflection point in 2025, with breakthrough innovations cutting costs by 30% and commercial deployments finally scaling beyond pilot phases.

The market has attracted over $1.2 billion in funding across late-stage rounds, while government support has reached unprecedented levels with $3.5 billion in U.S. DAC hubs and £9.4 billion in UK CCUS clusters.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

What are the biggest breakthroughs in carbon capture technology that have occurred in 2025 so far?

MIT's nanofiltration membrane technology represents the most significant cost breakthrough, cutting capture expenses by 30% to $450 per ton through a novel ion separation process that boosts efficiency sixfold.

Nuada's Scout pilot achieved a 90% reduction in energy consumption using metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) with vacuum pressure swing adsorption, capturing one ton per day from biomass flue gas in a modular design that can be replicated across industrial sites.

Norway's Longship project became operational as the world's first full-chain carbon capture, transport, and storage network, connecting Heidelberg cement capture with ship transport to subsea storage at Øygarden, processing 1.5 million tons annually in Phase 1.

Svante opened a 141,000 square foot gigafactory producing solid sorbent filters capable of 10 million tons per year CO₂ capacity, while Carbon Clean launched their 77,000 square foot Global Innovation Centre featuring the modular CycloneCC solvent-based capture system.

Need a clear, elegant overview of a market? Browse our structured slide decks for a quick, visual deep dive.

Which startups or companies raised the most funding for carbon capture solutions in 2025, and who are the key investors?

Twelve secured the largest round with $645 million in Series C funding led by TPG Rise Climate, focusing on their CO₂-to-fuel electrocatalysis technology achieving 90% efficiency for sustainable aviation fuel production.

If you want fresh and clear data on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What carbon capture technologies have moved from pilot to commercial scale this year, and what are their capture costs per ton?

Point-source capture systems have achieved commercial viability at $100-$130 per ton across cement plants, power generation, and waste-to-energy facilities, with multiple deployments now operational rather than experimental.

Direct air capture has reached commercial scale through 1PointFive's Stratos facility in Texas, operating at $400-$500 per ton with DOE's $3.5 billion DAC hubs program supporting additional large-scale deployments.

Svante's solid sorbent filter technology transitioned from pilot to commercial manufacturing with their gigafactory targeting costs below $100 per ton by 2030, while maintaining 99% CO₂ purity in captured streams.

MIT's nanofiltration breakthrough has achieved technology readiness at $450 per ton, representing a 30% cost reduction from previous $600 per ton benchmarks, though full commercial deployment awaits final engineering optimization.

Wondering who's shaping this fast-moving industry? Our slides map out the top players and challengers in seconds.

How are governments supporting carbon capture in 2025 through new policies, tax incentives, or funding programs?

The U.S. 45Q tax credit provides $180 per ton for direct air capture and $60 per ton for utilization, with inflation indexing preserved in the 2025 budget and potential increases to $120-$130 per ton proposed by industry coalitions.

The Department of Energy allocated $52.5 million through the Commercial DAC Pilot Prize and $3.5 billion for DAC hubs, while the UK committed £9.4 billion for CCUS clusters including Acorn, Viking, HyNet, and East Coast Cluster projects targeting final investment decisions by 2025.

The EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) implementation from 2026 will require import carbon reporting and border taxes, incentivizing carbon capture adoption among exporters to European markets.

Australia released offshore acreage for CO₂ storage and expanded SDE++ subsidies, while multiple jurisdictions are implementing Low Carbon Fuel Standards that include DAC and carbon utilization pathways in their credit systems.

What are the most profitable business models currently emerging in carbon capture, and how are they expected to evolve through 2026?

The "pick-and-shovel" equipment model dominates profitability, with companies like Svante and Carbon Clean selling modular capture units combined with per-ton service fees, avoiding the capital intensity of owning and operating capture facilities.

Carbon utilization commands premium pricing through e-fuel production (Twelve's sustainable aviation fuel), chemical manufacturing (plastics from CO₂), and concrete mineralization (CarbonCure's strength-enhancing embedded CO₂) where products sell above commodity prices.

Hub and cluster infrastructure models leverage government backstops and shared transport/storage networks, with Northern Lights' cross-border CO₂ shipping and the UK's Track 1 clusters offering merchant storage contracts to multiple industrial emitters.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

Which industries are driving the most demand for carbon capture in 2025, and what are their specific use cases?

Hard-to-abate industrial sectors lead demand, with cement companies like Heidelberg implementing point-source capture systems connected to transport networks, and waste-to-energy operators like Hafslund Celsio deploying modular capture for connection to Northern Lights storage.

Data centers and AI companies are driving direct air capture demand for offsetting legacy emissions and achieving net-zero commitments, creating a high-value market segment willing to pay premium prices for permanent CO₂ removal.

The maritime industry has emerged as an unexpected growth area, with Berge Bulk piloting onboard carbon capture systems capable of capturing 15 tons per day during ocean transport using Filtree technology.

Steel and refining industries are adopting solid sorbent filter systems at point sources, while power generation facilities are retrofitting with post-combustion capture technologies enhanced by improved efficiency breakthroughs.

If you need to-the-point data on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What are the main technical limitations or risks still holding back wide-scale adoption of carbon capture in the next 3 to 5 years?

Energy intensity remains the primary constraint, with direct air capture requiring 250-600 megawatt-hours per ton captured, creating competition with AI and data centers for renewable electricity that could limit project viability.

Infrastructure bottlenecks include permitting delays for transport pipelines and storage sites, geological risks in subsea storage, and high upfront capital expenditure representing 45-90% of levelized costs of capture operations.

Operational reliability concerns have surfaced through real-world performance gaps, including Sleipner's CO₂ over-reporting issues and Gorgon's 30% capture rate versus its 80% design target, highlighting monitoring and verification challenges.

Cost competitiveness against other decarbonization options remains challenging, particularly for direct air capture at $250-600 per ton compared to nature-based solutions and industrial process improvements that may achieve emissions reductions more economically.

Who are the top five players dominating the carbon capture market right now, and what are their market shares or strategic advantages?

Market leadership is distributed across technology types rather than consolidated market shares, with each company holding strategic advantages in specific segments of the carbon capture value chain.

What's the current average cost per ton for direct air capture versus point-source capture, and how are those costs trending?

Direct air capture currently operates at $250-600 per ton with a target trajectory toward $100 per ton by 2030, driven by DOE-funded hubs achieving economies of scale and technological improvements like MIT's nanofiltration breakthrough.

Point-source capture has reached commercial viability at $100-130 per ton average costs, benefiting from concentration advantages in industrial flue gas streams and enhanced by efficiency improvements from metal-organic frameworks and advanced solvents.

Cost reduction trends show 20-30% improvements from 2024 levels across both categories, with point-source capture approaching economic competitiveness against carbon pricing mechanisms, while DAC requires continued scale and innovation to reach broad viability.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

If you want to build or invest on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What carbon utilization or storage methods are proving most scalable or commercially viable in 2025?

E-fuel production leads commercial viability, with Twelve's $645 million funding round supporting CO₂ electrocatalysis for sustainable aviation fuel at 90% efficiency, creating products that command premium pricing in regulated fuel markets.

Concrete mineralization through companies like CarbonCure and Solidia demonstrates immediate scalability by embedding captured CO₂ into building materials, strengthening concrete while generating revenue through product performance premiums rather than requiring separate CO₂ disposal.

Ocean alkalinity enhancement, pioneered by Planetary Technologies, offers lower per-ton removal costs through natural ocean chemistry processes, though still in pilot scale compared to more established geological storage approaches.

Subsea geological storage has proven commercially viable through Northern Lights' operational infrastructure, while BECCS (bioenergy with carbon capture and storage) emerges in renewable biomass power applications where fuel costs and capture can be optimized together.

What regulatory changes or carbon pricing mechanisms are expected in 2026 that could significantly impact the carbon capture market?

The EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism becomes fully operational in 2026, requiring carbon content reporting and border taxes on imports, creating strong incentives for exporters to implement carbon capture systems to maintain market access.

U.S. 45Q tax credit indexing continues with inflation adjustments, while industry coalitions propose increases to $120-130 per ton for point-source capture, potentially improving project economics significantly beyond current $60 per ton levels.

Low Carbon Fuel Standards expansion across U.S. West Coast states and Canada will include direct air capture and carbon utilization pathways, creating new revenue streams beyond traditional carbon credit markets.

State and provincial carbon pricing mechanisms are expanding coverage to include carbon removal credits, while international Article 6 mechanisms under the Paris Agreement may create standardized global carbon credit trading that benefits high-quality carbon capture projects.

How can new entrants or investors identify the highest-leverage entry points into the carbon capture value chain right now?

Modular capture equipment manufacturing offers the highest leverage entry point, developing plug-and-play sorbent or solvent units for industries lacking bespoke solutions, following Svante's successful gigafactory model without requiring massive infrastructure investments.

Cluster infrastructure investment in Track 2 regions like Viking and Acorn offers merchant model opportunities, providing CO₂ transport and storage services to multiple industrial emitters while benefiting from government backstops and shared infrastructure economics.

Carbon utilization markets targeting high-value chemicals, e-fuels, and building materials capture utilization premiums above commodity pricing, with companies like Twelve demonstrating $645 million funding rounds for sustainable fuel production from captured CO₂.

Monitoring and verification services address critical operational reliability gaps, offering advanced telemetry and monitoring systems to mitigate under-reporting risks like those seen at Sleipner and Gorgon, ensuring regulatory compliance and project credibility for the expanding market.

Conclusion

Sources

1. MIT nanofiltration breakthrough
2. MIT ACS Energy Letters analysis
3. Nuada Scout pilot
4. Longship CCS value chain
5. Carbon Clean GIC launch
6. Carbon capture funding landscape
7. DAC scale-up costs
8. 45Q impact on point-source
9. Aircapture funding & costs
10. DOE DAC Pilot Prize
11. 45Q preservation in budget
12. IEA DAC analysis
13. UK government CCUS support
14. UK spending review CCUS funding
15. EU & global CCUS policies
16. Global CCUS policies overview
17. Carbon capture business models
18. UK CCUS business models
19. CCS Association business models
20. Berge Bulk maritime capture
21. DAC cost pathways
22. Global CCS Institute cost analysis
23. CCS developments and challenges