How can technology address carbon emissions?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the carbon reduction technology market in a clean and beautiful presentation

Carbon emissions reached 37.8 Gt in 2024, driving unprecedented demand for technology solutions that can address climate change at scale.

The carbon reduction technology market presents a massive opportunity for entrepreneurs and investors, with proven solutions already delivering measurable results and a total addressable market of $3-5 trillion annually by 2030. Smart money is flowing into specific subsectors like carbon capture ($100B by 2030), green hydrogen ($150B by 2030), and digital monitoring platforms that enable precise emissions tracking.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

What are the main sources of carbon emissions today, and which sectors are contributing the most as of 2025?

Global energy-related CO₂ emissions reached a record 37.8 Gt in 2024, with electricity and heat generation accounting for 33% of total emissions through coal-fired power plants.

Transportation represents 16% of emissions, dominated by road vehicles, aviation, and shipping. Manufacturing and construction contribute 13% through cement, steel, and chemical production processes that remain heavily carbon-intensive. Agriculture and land use combine for 15% of emissions, with methane from livestock and rice paddies plus deforestation representing the largest sources.

Residential and commercial buildings account for 6% through heating, cooling, and appliance use, while fugitive emissions from oil and gas operations contribute another 6% primarily through methane leaks. These six sectors represent 89% of global carbon emissions, making them the primary targets for technology intervention.

The concentration of emissions in these sectors creates clear investment opportunities. Electricity generation offers the largest single target, with proven renewable technologies already displacing fossil generation. Transportation electrification addresses the second-largest source, while industrial decarbonization tackles manufacturing emissions through process electrification and hydrogen adoption.

Need a clear, elegant overview of a market? Browse our structured slide decks for a quick, visual deep dive.

What technologies have already proven effective in reducing emissions across key industries like energy, transport, agriculture, and construction?

Renewable electricity technologies avoided 2.6 Gt CO₂ in 2023 alone by replacing fossil fuel generation, with solar PV and wind power achieving cost parity or better than coal in most markets.

In energy, heat pumps and electric boilers reduce direct fuel use by 50-80% when electrifying industrial and building heat systems. Smart grids combined with battery storage smooth renewable output variability and avoided 0.5 Gt CO₂ in power sector growth. These technologies demonstrate commercial viability with clear payback periods.

Transportation electrification cuts tailpipe CO₂ by 60-100% versus internal combustion engines, with global electric car stock reaching 16 million vehicles in 2024 and avoiding approximately 200 Mt CO₂. Hydrogen fuel cell buses and trucks show 80%+ CO₂ reduction in commercial deployments across select cities. Sustainable aviation fuels achieved 65% lifecycle emission reduction in over 10 commercial flights during 2024.

Agriculture benefits from precision farming and agroforestry, where GPS-guided equipment and variable-rate fertilization cut N₂O emissions by up to 30%. On-farm anaerobic digesters capture methane for biogas production, replacing fossil gas in heat and power applications. Alternative proteins from plant-based and fermentation sources reduce livestock methane by 80% compared to conventional meat production.

Construction and manufacturing deploy carbon-cured concrete that injects CO₂ into concrete mix, sequestering 0.5 kg CO₂ per cubic meter. Electric arc furnaces for scrap-based steelmaking cut CO₂ by 75% versus blast-furnace processes. 3D-printed building components minimize material use and waste throughout the construction process.

If you want to build on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Which startups or scaleups in 2025 are leading the way in carbon capture, renewable energy, or low-emission infrastructure, and how are they being funded?

Carbon capture startups raised significant funding in 2025, with Twelve securing $645M Series C for electrochemical CO₂ conversion to chemicals, and Svante raising $318M Series E plus $100M convertible for solid-sorbent point-source capture technology.

Climeworks raised $162M for direct air capture modules, while Carbon Engineering secured $119M for large-scale DAC and fuel synthesis operations. These funding rounds demonstrate investor confidence in proven carbon capture technologies approaching commercial scale.

Renewable energy infrastructure attracts substantial investment through companies like CarbonCure Technologies, which raised $14.4M for CO₂-infused concrete technology. Noya secured $12.2M Series A for tidal energy converters, while Hytrade raised venture funding for energy-as-a-service microgrids in Australia.

Low-emission infrastructure companies include IncGRID in the Netherlands, raising Series B funding for modular battery packs targeting construction sites. Salinex received grant funding via Singapore's EDB for wave-solar hybrid power systems designed for shipping applications.

Wondering who's shaping this fast-moving industry? Our slides map out the top players and challengers in seconds.

What is the average cost of deploying these technologies, and how does that compare to the cost of inaction or traditional alternatives?

Wind and solar demonstrate clear cost advantages with LCOE of $20-50/MWh versus $60-150/MWh for new coal plants, making renewable energy the economically rational choice for new electricity generation.

Carbon capture technologies cost $50-90 per ton CO₂ stored onshore and $65-105 per ton offshore, with post-combustion capture representing the current commercial standard. Green hydrogen production costs $3-6/kg today versus a target of $1-2/kg by 2030, requiring continued scale-up and technology advancement.

The cost of climate inaction dramatically exceeds technology deployment costs, with delayed action potentially incurring up to $1,266 trillion in global damages by 2100. Physical climate risks threaten 5-25% of corporate profits by 2050, while unmitigated warming could reduce global GDP by 11-15% compared to 1-3% with decisive climate action.

Technology deployment delivers immediate returns through reduced operating costs. Microsoft reports $1.8B value from reduced offset costs through 1 Mt CO₂ removal contracts. Google saved $300M in energy procurement over five years through 100% renewable electricity via power purchase agreements. Unilever achieved 30% cuts in scope 1/2 emissions costs and 5% margin uplift through solar installations and biogas fuel shifts.

Which countries or regions are offering the most attractive subsidies, tax breaks, or policy frameworks for climate tech companies or investors in 2025?

The United States offers the most comprehensive climate tech incentives through the Inflation Reduction Act, providing $370B in tax credits including 45Q for carbon capture, 48C for clean electricity, and 30D for electric vehicles and batteries.

Europe delivers substantial support through the EU Green Deal and Fit for 55 package, with the Emissions Trading System maintaining carbon prices of 20-45 €/t CO₂ and the Innovation Fund providing over €40B to 2030. Germany specifically offers 0% interest KfW loans for hydrogen projects, making it particularly attractive for green hydrogen ventures.

China implements renewable portfolio standards and operates a national carbon market with prices around CNY 80/t, while maintaining feed-in tariffs for photovoltaic and wind installations. Singapore provides up to 40% cost support for green buildings through the Green Mark Incentive Scheme.

Australia's Safeguard Mechanism creates credits for captured CCS emissions, while hydrogen H₂ Headstart grants support early-stage hydrogen projects. These frameworks create predictable revenue streams that reduce investment risk and improve project economics for climate technology deployment.

What are the main technological bottlenecks or challenges still limiting the large-scale deployment of emissions-reducing solutions?

High upfront capital expenditure remains the primary barrier, with CCUS plants requiring $100-200M per 100,000 tons CO₂/year capacity, creating financing challenges for first-of-kind commercial projects.

Renewable energy intermittency demands 80-150 GW of storage capacity by 2030 to balance solar and wind peaks, requiring massive battery manufacturing scale-up and grid infrastructure investment. Hydrogen electrolyzer deployment faces limited platinum group metal supply and manufacturing capacity shortages that constrain production scaling.

Infrastructure gaps create deployment bottlenecks, particularly for CO₂ transport pipelines that remain underbuilt despite capture technology readiness. Permitting delays of 5-10 years for major infrastructure projects slow commercial deployment and increase development costs.

Technical integration challenges persist across sectors. Industrial heat applications require process redesign for electrification. Long-duration storage technologies need further development for seasonal renewable energy balancing. Sustainable aviation fuel production requires feedstock sourcing at scale.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

If you want clear data about this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

How are large corporations integrating emissions-focused technologies into their supply chains or operations, and what ROI have they reported so far?

Microsoft leads corporate carbon removal integration with 1 Mt CO₂ removal contracts, claiming net $1.8B value from reduced offset costs compared to traditional fossil-based credits.

Google achieved 100% renewable electricity through power purchase agreements, delivering $300M savings in energy procurement over five years while eliminating scope 2 emissions. Unilever implemented on-site solar installations and biogas fuel shifts, achieving 30% reductions in scope 1/2 emissions costs and 5% margin improvements.

Supply chain integration focuses on renewable energy procurement, with over 70% of Fortune 100 companies now maintaining Science-Based Targets. Companies deploy digital twins and building management systems to cut energy use by 10-15% through optimized operations.

ROI measurement includes avoided carbon costs, energy savings, and operational efficiency gains. Early adopters report payback periods of 3-7 years for renewable energy investments and 2-5 years for energy efficiency upgrades. Risk mitigation value includes supply chain resilience and regulatory compliance benefits.

What kind of data infrastructure, measurement tools, or standards are essential to track emissions reductions effectively, and who is offering them?

MRV (Monitoring, Reporting, Verification) platforms provide CFO-grade carbon accounting through companies like Persefoni, Watershed, and Sylvera, which offers carbon credit grading and verification services.

Satellite and AI monitoring deliver real-time emissions tracking through GHGSat and Kayrros for methane leak detection, enabling immediate response to emissions events. Blockchain registries from Flowcarbon and Pachama ensure transparent carbon credit tracking and prevent double-counting.

Essential standards include ISO 14064-1/2 for organizational carbon accounting, GHG Protocol Corporate Standard for emissions inventory, and third-party verification through Verra VCS and Gold Standard programs. These standards ensure data quality and investor confidence.

Digital infrastructure requirements include automated data collection from IoT sensors, API integration with enterprise systems, and real-time dashboard reporting. Companies need continuous monitoring capabilities rather than annual reporting to manage emissions effectively and capture offset value.

Which consumer or B2B behaviors are shifting most quickly toward low-carbon alternatives, and how can technology accelerate that shift further?

Electric vehicle adoption accelerated to 14% of new car sales globally in 2024, up from 6% in 2020, driven by cost parity achievement and charging infrastructure expansion.

Time-of-use electricity tariffs and smart charging systems increase off-peak EV charging by 50%, reducing grid stress and carbon intensity. Sustainable procurement practices show over 70% of Fortune 100 companies implementing Science-Based Targets for supply chain emissions.

Technology acceleration includes digital twins and gamification that reduce building energy use by 10-15% through behavioral feedback. API-based carbon labels enable real-time footprint estimation at point of sale, influencing purchase decisions. Mobility-as-a-service platforms integrate rideshare and micro-mobility, reducing CO₂ per trip by 30% through optimized routing and mode selection.

B2B behavior shifts focus on renewable energy procurement, with corporate PPAs reaching record volumes. Technology platforms enable automated renewable energy certificate trading and real-time carbon accounting for supply chain decisions.

If you want to build or invest on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What are the most promising business models for monetizing emissions reduction in 2025—carbon credits, direct offsets, licensing, hardware-as-a-service?

Carbon credits and offsets represent a $3B+ voluntary carbon market in 2024, with quality premiums of $15-30/t for direct air capture credits compared to traditional forestry offsets.

Direct emissions reduction services through CCUS Hardware-as-a-Service models command $80-100/t contracts, as demonstrated by companies like CarbonCapture Inc. Battery storage arrays lease at $50/kW-month, providing predictable revenue streams for energy storage providers.

Energy Performance Contracts guarantee energy savings sharing, with providers capturing 15-25% of achieved savings. This model transfers performance risk to technology providers while ensuring customer value realization.

Licensing models work for proven technologies with clear intellectual property protection. Hardware-as-a-service reduces customer capital requirements while creating recurring revenue streams for technology providers. The optimal model depends on technology maturity, capital intensity, and customer risk tolerance.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

What regulatory changes are expected in 2026 and beyond that could open up or restrict opportunities for carbon tech startups or funds?

EU Emissions Trading System caps will tighten significantly, with the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism expanding to steel and cement sectors by 2026, creating mandatory demand for low-carbon alternatives.

The US 45Q tax credit for carbon capture will phase down to extend credits beyond 2033 at $35/t, requiring projects to achieve commercial viability at lower subsidy levels. Global methane pledge 2.0 will mandate detection and repair for oil and gas operations, driving demand for monitoring technologies.

IETA global carbon credit standards aim to harmonize the voluntary carbon market by 2027, potentially reducing fragmentation and improving credit quality and pricing transparency. Stricter 2030 sectoral targets in multiple jurisdictions will accelerate industrial decarbonization requirements.

Regulatory certainty creates investable frameworks, while changing standards may disrupt existing business models. Companies should monitor regulatory development and maintain flexibility to adapt to evolving compliance requirements.

How big is the potential market for carbon-reduction technologies over the next five years, and what are the best entry points for new players or investors?

The total addressable market reaches $3-5 trillion annually by 2030 according to the IEA Net Zero Scenario, with fast-growing subsectors including CCUS ($100B by 2030), green hydrogen and derivatives ($150B by 2030), and mobility-as-a-service ($500B annually global).

Best entry points focus on critical infrastructure gaps including midstream CO₂ transport hubs, EV charging networks, digital MRV platforms, and circular building materials. These sectors offer immediate commercial opportunities with proven demand.

Portfolio approaches work best, investing across proven renewables, electrification, CCUS, and digital platforms to achieve greatest emissions reduction at lowest net cost. Investors should target policy-supported sectors and partner with MRV/data providers to unlock growth opportunities.

Market timing favors immediate entry given policy support, technology readiness, and corporate demand convergence. Early market participants capture first-mover advantages in rapidly maturing subsectors, while late entrants face increased competition and higher valuations.

Conclusion

Sources

1. Visual Capitalist - Global Carbon Emissions by Sector
2. IEA - CO2 Emissions in 2023 Executive Summary
3. LSE Grantham Institute - Technology to Cut Carbon Emissions
4. Montel Energy - Technologies to Reduce Carbon Emissions
5. Industrial Decarbonization Network - Net Zero Technologies
6. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews - Agricultural Emissions
7. World Biogas Association - IEA Biogas Outlook 2025
8. NewClimate Institute - Corporate Climate Responsibility Monitor 2025
9. Seedtable - Best Carbon Removal Startups
10. Quick Market Pitch - Carbon Capture Funding
11. StartUs Insights - Renewable Energy Startups
12. Enlit World - Top Energy Tech Startups 2025
13. IPCC - Special Report on Carbon Capture and Storage
14. NCBI - Carbon Capture Technology Assessment
15. Climate Policy Initiative - Cost of Inaction
16. World Economic Forum - Cost of Inaction 2024
17. Business Insider - Climate Tech Tax Credits
18. FFG - Climate Tech Ecosystems Report 2025
19. IEA - World Energy Investment 2025 China
20. Global CCS Institute - CO2 Capture Transport Storage Costs