What are the trends in carbon capture?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the carbon capture market in a clean and beautiful presentation

The carbon capture market has evolved dramatically from traditional amine-based systems to breakthrough technologies like metal-organic frameworks and electrochemical capture.

Policy incentives—particularly the U.S. 45Q tax credit offering up to $85 per ton of CO₂—are fundamentally reshaping investment patterns and technology development priorities. While established players focus on scaling proven solutions, innovative startups are introducing modular, energy-efficient approaches that promise to slash capture costs below $50 per ton.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

Get a Clear, Visual
Overview of This Market

We've already structured this market in a clean, concise, and up-to-date presentation. If you don't have time to waste digging around, download it now.

DOWNLOAD THE DECK

What technologies have anchored the carbon capture market for decades and still drive most commercial deployments?

Three foundational technologies have dominated industrial carbon capture since the 1960s and continue to represent the backbone of current commercial capacity.

Post-combustion chemical absorption using monoethanolamine (MEA) and advanced solvents remains the most widely deployed approach, achieving 85-90% capture efficiency with over 95% CO₂ purity at technology readiness level 9. These systems are extensively deployed at coal and gas power plants, cement facilities, steel mills, and natural gas processing plants across North America and Europe.

Pre-combustion capture integrates at syngas and hydrogen production facilities, utilizing both physical and chemical solvents like potassium carbonate through the Benfield process. This approach captures CO₂ before combustion occurs, often achieving higher concentrations and lower separation costs compared to post-combustion methods.

Oxy-fuel combustion represents the third pillar, burning fuel in pure oxygen rather than air to produce a flue gas stream containing approximately 89% CO₂. This dramatically simplifies downstream separation and purification processes, though it requires significant energy for oxygen production.

These first-generation approaches collectively underpin the current global CCUS capacity of approximately 52 million tons per annum as of 2023, with the U.S. 45Q tax credit providing up to $85 per ton of CO₂ for permanent storage making many projects economically viable.

Which breakthrough technologies are emerging as potential game-changers in carbon capture efficiency and economics?

Revolutionary approaches focusing on dramatically reduced energy requirements and modular deployment are reshaping the technology landscape.

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) represent perhaps the most promising breakthrough, with highly porous crystalline materials achieving over 95% capture efficiency at industrial point sources. Companies like Svante, Nuada (formerly MOF Technologies), and NovoMOF are developing modular pilot systems processing 1-30 tons of CO₂ per day, with NovoMOF scaling commercial production to target 36,000 tons per annum for projects like Climeworks' facilities and planning 500,000 tons per annum for Occidental's Stratos project.

Electrochemical capture technologies eliminate the need for thermal regeneration entirely, instead using electrical energy to capture and release CO₂. Verdox utilizes electric flow cells, RepAir develops zero-heat battery systems, and Mission Zero employs bio-membrane approaches, all targeting significant reductions in energy penalties compared to traditional thermal systems.

Direct air capture innovations extend beyond Climeworks' established alkali-hydroxide approach. Heirloom Carbon focuses on limestone mineralization cycles, Airhive develops mineral sorbents, ZeoDac combines zeolites with atmospheric water harvesting, while companies like Noya, Spiritus, Octavia, Phlair, and Parallel Carbon explore diverse DAC pathways with varying energy and cost profiles.

Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) technologies convert captured CO₂ into valuable products rather than simply storing it. LanzaTech leads with gas fermentation processes, eChemicles develops CO₂-to-CO electrolyzers, Oxylus targets CO₂-to-methanol conversion, enaDyne employs plasma catalysis, and Dioxycle focuses on ethylene production.

Need a clear, elegant overview of a market? Browse our structured slide decks for a quick, visual deep dive.

If you want updated data about this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Which previously hyped carbon capture approaches have failed to gain commercial traction and why?

Several technologies that generated significant attention and investment 3-5 years ago have encountered substantial barriers to commercial deployment.

Blue hydrogen production combining natural gas reforming with carbon capture faces mounting economic and environmental challenges. While technically feasible, projects struggle with high capital costs, significant methane leakage concerns throughout the natural gas supply chain, and increasingly unfavorable economics compared to green hydrogen produced via renewable-powered electrolysis.

Ocean-based CO₂ storage and mineralization approaches have proven logistically complex with uncertain environmental impacts. Limited pilot data, regulatory uncertainty around marine interventions, and the technical challenges of operating capture and storage systems in marine environments have slowed progress significantly compared to terrestrial alternatives.

Large-scale enhanced oil recovery (EOR) as the primary business model for carbon capture has faced criticism for extending fossil fuel extraction rather than supporting genuine decarbonization. While EOR continues as a revenue source for some projects, investors and policymakers increasingly favor storage or utilization pathways that don't perpetuate hydrocarbon production.

Biochar and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) at industrial scale remain largely confined to niche applications due to uncertain economics without premium carbon credit pricing. The agricultural logistics, storage requirements, and measurement challenges have limited deployment beyond demonstration projects.

What emerging trends are demonstrating real commercial momentum and investor interest right now?

Four distinct trends are attracting substantial capital and demonstrating clear pathways to commercial scale in the near term.

Modular, factory-built capture systems are reducing both capital costs and deployment timelines compared to custom-engineered facilities. Standardized MOF-based modules, containerized DAC units, and plug-and-play electrochemical systems enable rapid scaling and reduce balance-of-plant costs by 30-50% compared to traditional approaches.

Industrial carbon capture hubs and shared infrastructure projects are achieving economies of scale by clustering multiple CO₂ sources around common transport and storage networks. Projects in Louisiana's industrial corridor, Texas Gulf Coast, and North Dakota are demonstrating how shared pipeline and storage infrastructure can reduce per-project capital expenditure significantly.

Integration with carbon utilization pathways is creating revenue streams beyond pure storage applications. Concrete curing, chemical feedstock production, and fuel synthesis are providing positive cash flows that improve overall project economics, particularly when combined with carbon credit revenues and tax incentives.

Electrification of capture processes enables renewable energy integration and reduces dependence on thermal energy sources. This trend aligns with grid decarbonization and allows capture operations to optimize energy consumption timing based on renewable electricity availability and pricing.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

The Market Pitch
Without the Noise

We have prepared a clean, beautiful and structured summary of this market, ideal if you want to get smart fast, or present it clearly.

DOWNLOAD

Which carbon capture technologies remain primarily hype without proven commercial viability or scale?

Several approaches continue to generate media attention and research funding despite lacking demonstrated pathways to commercial deployment at meaningful scale.

Ocean-based CO₂ removal technologies including enhanced ocean alkalinization, direct seawater electrolysis, and marine biomass cultivation remain confined to early research phases with no commercial-scale demonstrations. Environmental impact assessments, regulatory frameworks, and technical scalability questions persist without clear resolution timelines.

Biochar production and agricultural BECCS applications face fundamental economic challenges without premium carbon credit pricing exceeding $100 per ton. The distributed nature of feedstock sources, transportation logistics, and measurement/verification complexities limit scalability beyond niche applications.

Advanced mineralization approaches using ultraviolet light or plasma-only processes show laboratory promise but lack pilot-scale validation. Energy requirements, equipment durability, and process economics remain unproven at scales necessary for commercial relevance.

Atmospheric water harvesting combined with CO₂ capture, while technically interesting, faces energy efficiency challenges that make standalone deployment economically unviable compared to dedicated capture or water production systems.

Which specific companies are pioneering each major technology trend and what differentiates their approaches?

The competitive landscape spans from established engineering firms scaling proven technologies to innovative startups developing breakthrough approaches across multiple technology categories.

Technology Category	Leading Companies	Distinctive Approach
MOF-Based Capture	Nuada, Svante, NovoMOF, Captivate, UniSieve	Nuada: Modular MOF pressure-swing adsorption; Svante: Industrial flue gas pilots; NovoMOF: Large-scale MOF material production targeting 500 ktpa
Electrochemical Systems	Verdox, RepAir, Mission Zero	Verdox: Electric flow cells with quinone chemistry; RepAir: Zero-heat electrochemical batteries; Mission Zero: Bio-membrane integration
Direct Air Capture	Climeworks, Carbon Engineering, Heirloom, Airhive, ZeoDac	Climeworks: Alkali-hydroxide sorbents; Heirloom: Limestone mineralization cycles; ZeoDac: Zeolites with water co-production
Carbon Utilization	LanzaTech, eChemicles, Oxylus, enaDyne, Dioxycle	LanzaTech: Gas fermentation to ethanol; eChemicles: CO₂-to-CO electrolysis; Oxylus: Methanol synthesis; Dioxycle: Ethylene production
Traditional Scale-Up	Fluor, Shell, ExxonMobil, Mitsubishi Heavy	Engineering scale-up of proven amine systems with improved solvents and heat integration
Integrated Solutions	Occidental (1PointFive), Chevron, TotalEnergies	Vertically integrated capture-transport-storage with EOR or saline storage
Emerging Players	Spiritus, Octavia, Phlair, Parallel Carbon, Noya	Novel sorbent materials, alternative DAC cycles, and specialized industrial applications

If you want to grasp this market fast, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What fundamental problems are these technologies addressing to make carbon capture more commercially viable?

Carbon capture innovation targets five critical pain points that have historically limited widespread deployment and economic viability.

High energy requirements and associated costs represent the primary barrier, with traditional MEA-based systems requiring 25-35% of plant output for capture operations. Novel sorbents like MOFs and electrochemical approaches aim to reduce this energy penalty to below 15% through elimination of thermal regeneration requirements and improved thermodynamic efficiency.

Scalability challenges from custom-engineered, site-specific systems drive the push toward modular, factory-built units that can achieve economies of scale in manufacturing while reducing deployment timelines from 5-7 years to 2-3 years for standardized configurations.

Limited revenue generation from pure storage models motivates the focus on carbon utilization pathways that create marketable products including chemicals, fuels, and building materials. These approaches can generate $50-200 per ton in product revenues compared to storage-only economics dependent on tax credits and carbon pricing.

Infrastructure bottlenecks including CO₂ transport pipelines and geological storage access drive development of shared hub models and alternative storage approaches including mineralization and utilization that reduce dependence on centralized geological formations.

Policy and financing uncertainty affects project development timelines and capital access, leading to emphasis on technologies with shorter payback periods and reduced exposure to long-term policy changes or carbon price volatility.

Wondering who's shaping this fast-moving industry? Our slides map out the top players and challengers in seconds.

How are government policies and incentives shaping technology development priorities and investment flows?

Regulatory frameworks and financial incentives have become the primary drivers of technology selection, deployment timing, and geographic concentration of carbon capture investments.

The U.S. 45Q tax credit provides up to $85 per ton for CO₂ stored in saline formations and $60 per ton for utilization applications, with direct-pay mechanisms and inflation indexing making projects financially viable without traditional tax equity structures. This policy has driven over 270 announced U.S. CCUS projects representing approximately $77 billion in capital expenditure commitments.

The European Union's Net-Zero Industry Act establishes a target of 50 million tons per annum CO₂ injection capacity by 2030, while the CCS Directive provides legal clarity on transport and storage permitting processes. EU Emissions Trading System allowances covering stored CO₂ create additional revenue streams for European projects.

Department of Energy funding through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and Inflation Reduction Act allocates $12 billion for demonstration and large-scale pilots, $1 billion for research and development, and substantial support for clean hydrogen hubs that couple with CCUS deployment.

State-level policies including California's Low Carbon Fuel Standard, regional carbon pricing mechanisms, and renewable portfolio standards with carbon capture credits are creating additional revenue streams that influence technology selection toward approaches with co-benefits including renewable integration and local air quality improvements.

What specific milestones and technology developments should investors expect by 2026?

The next 18 months will feature several critical technology demonstrations and commercial deployments that will significantly influence market direction and investor confidence.

Commercial demonstration of 3-5 large-scale direct air capture plants exceeding 500,000 tons per annum capacity, including Occidental's Stratos facility in Texas and potentially Climeworks' expanded operations, will provide crucial performance and cost validation for the DAC sector.

Multiple MOF-based pilot projects will scale from current 1-10 tons per day systems to 50+ tons per day modules, with at least two companies demonstrating integrated capture-transport-storage operations at industrial facilities including cement plants and steel mills.

U.S. CCUS capacity will exceed 100 million tons per annum with commissioning of major projects including multiple LNG terminal capture systems, power plant retrofits, and industrial hub developments in Louisiana, Texas, and North Dakota.

First commercial-scale electrochemical capture systems will begin operations at power plants or industrial facilities, demonstrating renewable energy integration and validating cost projections for zero-heat capture approaches.

Carbon utilization pathways will achieve significant scale with multiple plants producing over 100,000 tons annually of chemicals, fuels, or building materials from captured CO₂, establishing market prices and demand patterns for CCU products.

We've Already Mapped This Market

From key figures to models and players, everything's already in one structured and beautiful deck, ready to download.

DOWNLOAD

If you want fresh and clear data on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

How will the carbon capture market evolve over the next five years in terms of technology mix, business models, and demand patterns?

The market will transition from demonstration projects toward commercial deployment across multiple technology pathways with distinct applications and economic models.

Global CCUS capacity will reach approximately 200 million tons per annum by 2030, with growth concentrated in modular technologies that achieve cost reductions through manufacturing scale rather than project-by-project engineering. MOF-based systems will capture 15-20% of new capacity additions, while electrochemical approaches will gain share in renewable-rich grids.

Business models will shift from pure storage approaches toward integrated capture-utilization operations that generate multiple revenue streams. Hybrid facilities producing chemicals, fuels, and building materials from captured CO₂ will achieve better financial returns and reduced dependence on carbon pricing or tax incentives.

Industry adoption will expand beyond power generation and natural gas processing toward cement, steel, and chemical production where process emissions are difficult to eliminate through other decarbonization approaches. These sectors will drive demand for higher-temperature, higher-concentration capture technologies.

Carbon markets will mature with standardized measurement, reporting, and verification protocols enabling liquid trading of capture credits. This will support project financing and create price discovery mechanisms that influence technology development priorities toward approaches with robust monitoring and verification capabilities.

Regional differences will become more pronounced with Europe emphasizing storage in North Sea formations, North America developing industrial hubs around existing infrastructure, and Asia focusing on utilization applications given limited geological storage options.

Which industries and applications represent the most attractive early adoption opportunities for new carbon capture technologies?

Specific industrial sectors present distinct characteristics that make them particularly suitable for different capture technology approaches and deployment timelines.

Cement and steel production offer concentrated, high-purity CO₂ streams that are well-suited for MOF-based modular systems, with captured CO₂ potentially utilized in concrete curing processes that create additional revenue while permanently storing carbon in building materials.

Natural gas processing and LPG facilities provide consistent, high-volume CO₂ sources with existing infrastructure for gas handling and purification, making them attractive for pre-combustion and membrane separation technologies developed by companies like Nuada and Svante.

Clean hydrogen production will drive demand for both blue hydrogen with carbon capture and green hydrogen facilities that can utilize captured CO₂ for synthetic fuel production, supported by federal hydrogen hub funding and 45Q tax credit eligibility.

Bioenergy facilities including ethanol plants and biomass power generation offer opportunities for BECCS applications that generate negative emissions, qualifying for premium carbon credit pricing and enhanced tax incentives.

Power generation retrofits will focus on natural gas plants in regions with high renewable penetration where flexible, low-energy capture systems can operate during peak demand periods while maximizing renewable integration during off-peak hours.

Direct air capture deployment will concentrate initially at industrial sites where waste heat is available and CO₂ can be utilized on-site, including beverage production facilities, greenhouse operations, and chemical plants requiring CO₂ feedstock.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

What risks and barriers should entrepreneurs and investors evaluate before entering the carbon capture market?

Market entry requires careful assessment of technology, policy, and commercial risks that can significantly impact project economics and timeline assumptions.

High capital expenditure requirements and energy penalties create substantial financial exposure, particularly for early-stage technologies where performance at commercial scale remains unproven. Novel systems may require 2-3 deployment cycles to achieve target costs and efficiency metrics, extending payback periods beyond initial projections.

Policy uncertainty represents a critical risk factor as changes to tax credit structures, carbon pricing mechanisms, or environmental regulations can fundamentally alter project economics. The 45Q credit's current structure expires in 2032, creating uncertainty for projects with longer development timelines.

Public acceptance challenges surrounding CO₂ pipeline development and geological storage have led to project delays and cancellations in several regions. Community engagement and transparent safety protocols are essential for infrastructure development but add complexity and cost to project execution.

Technology maturity gaps between laboratory performance and commercial deployment create scale-up risks including equipment reliability, process optimization, and integration challenges that may not emerge until pilot or demonstration phases.

Long-term liability and insurance requirements for CO₂ storage create ongoing financial obligations including monitoring, measurement, and potential leakage remediation that extend decades beyond initial project completion and may not be fully quantifiable during project development phases.

Supply chain constraints for specialized materials including MOF synthesis, electrochemical components, and specialized solvents may limit scaling speed and create cost volatility for projects dependent on emerging technologies.

Conclusion

Sources

1. Concawe Technology Scouting Report
2. CSIS Analysis on 45Q Tax Credits
3. IDTechEx CCUS Market Trends
4. IDTechEx MOF Carbon Capture Analysis
5. ESG Today NovoMOF Funding Report
6. RepAir Carbon Technologies
7. Verdox Electrochemical Capture
8. Carbon Credits Direct Air Capture Investment
9. Global Venturing DAC Startups Report
10. World Economic Forum CCU Startups
11. Global CCS Institute European Overview
12. Carbon Capture Coalition 45Q Analysis
13. Publyon EU CCUS Plan Analysis
14. Clean Energy Ministerial CCUS Policies Overview
15. World Economic Forum CCS Essentials