How do climate tech companies make money?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the climate tech market in a clean and beautiful presentation

Climate tech companies have evolved far beyond simple hardware sales to create sophisticated revenue models that attract billions in investment.

The sector now spans everything from subscription-based carbon accounting software to Energy-as-a-Service contracts that generate predictable monthly revenue. Understanding these monetization strategies is crucial for anyone looking to enter this $1.8 trillion market as either an entrepreneur or investor.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

How do climate tech companies actually make money today?

Climate tech companies generate revenue through seven primary models, with the most successful combining hardware sales with recurring service fees.

Asset sales remain the foundation for hardware-heavy companies like First Solar, which sells photovoltaic panels at approximately $0.25 per watt with 20-30% gross margins after tax incentives. However, pure hardware sales face challenges with linear growth patterns and high capital requirements that limit scalability.

Energy-as-a-Service (EaaS) models have emerged as the most investor-attractive approach, where companies like Sonnen install residential solar systems and charge monthly fees covering installation, operations, maintenance, and energy delivery. These contracts typically run 10-25 years and generate Internal Rates of Return (IRR) enhanced by federal tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act.

Software-based companies monetize through subscription models, with carbon accounting platforms like Carbon Analytics charging $1,249 to $24,995 annually based on company size and feature access. These SaaS models achieve 70-80% gross margins and high customer retention rates due to regulatory compliance requirements.

Usage-based billing applies to companies like Climeworks, which charges per ton of CO₂ removed through their direct air capture technology. This model scales with customer demand and ties revenue directly to environmental impact delivery.

What are the most common business models used in climate tech, and how do they work?

The seven dominant climate tech business models each address different market segments and capital requirements.

If you want to build on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Which types of revenue streams are typically recurring, and which are one-off or transactional?

Recurring revenue streams dominate the most valuable climate tech companies, while transactional models remain prevalent in capital-intensive hardware segments.

Recurring revenue includes SaaS subscriptions for carbon accounting software, Energy-as-a-Service contracts, marketplace commission fees, and usage-based billing for API calls or carbon removal services. These models generate predictable cash flows that investors value at higher multiples, typically 5-15x revenue compared to 1-3x for hardware sales.

Platform businesses like Patch, which facilitates carbon credit transactions, earn recurring commission revenue from ongoing marketplace activity. Each transaction generates 3-8% commission fees, creating compound revenue growth as marketplace volume increases.

One-off transactional revenue comes from direct hardware sales, project-based consulting services, initial installation fees, and standard equipment purchases. While these generate immediate cash flow, they require constant new customer acquisition and offer limited scalability advantages.

Curious about how money is made in this sector? Explore the most profitable business models in our sleek decks.

Smart climate tech companies increasingly bundle one-off sales with recurring services. Neustark sells CO₂ injection equipment upfront then shares revenue from carbon credit sales at $350-500 per ton, creating both immediate and ongoing income streams.

Can you give examples of startups or companies that are successfully using each of these models?

Leading climate tech companies demonstrate how different business models create sustainable competitive advantages across various sectors.

Tesla exemplifies the asset sales model through electric vehicle manufacturing, achieving $96.8 billion in 2023 revenue primarily from car sales. However, Tesla also incorporates recurring revenue through Supercharger network fees and software updates, showing how pure hardware companies evolve toward hybrid models.

Sonnen pioneered the Energy-as-a-Service model in residential solar, installing systems at no upfront cost and charging monthly fees that cover equipment, maintenance, and energy delivery. This approach removes customer acquisition barriers while generating 15-20 year recurring revenue streams.

Carbon Analytics represents the SaaS subscription model, offering tiered pricing from $1,249 for small companies to $24,995 for enterprises. Their software helps companies track Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions, with high retention rates driven by mandatory ESG reporting requirements.

Climeworks operates a usage-based billing model for direct air capture, charging customers per ton of CO₂ permanently removed from the atmosphere. Corporate customers like Microsoft and Swiss Re purchase specific tonnages, with pricing around $600-1,000 per ton in 2025.

Patch built a marketplace platform connecting carbon credit buyers with verified offset projects, earning 3-8% commission on each transaction. Their platform processed over $100 million in carbon credit transactions in 2024, demonstrating scalable network effects.

Which climate tech models have been the most profitable or attractive to investors in 2025?

SaaS subscription models command the highest valuations in 2025, followed by Energy-as-a-Service and marketplace platforms that demonstrate network effects.

Software-based climate tech companies achieve 70-80% gross margins and receive valuations of 10-15x annual recurring revenue (ARR), significantly higher than hardware-focused companies that trade at 1-3x revenue multiples. This valuation premium reflects lower capital intensity, higher scalability, and more predictable cash flows.

Energy-as-a-Service models attract strong investor interest due to 40-60% gross margins and enhanced returns from Inflation Reduction Act tax credits. Companies like Sunrun and Sunnova demonstrate how EaaS models generate 15-20% internal rates of return while providing customer acquisition advantages through zero upfront costs.

Marketplace platforms show exceptional growth potential, with companies like Patch and Eggify demonstrating 30-40% compound annual growth rates. These platforms benefit from network effects where increasing buyers attract more sellers, creating defensible competitive moats.

Hardware sales models face pressure from commoditization and capital intensity requirements. However, companies that combine hardware sales with recurring services, like Tesla's combination of vehicle sales with Supercharger network revenue, achieve higher valuations than pure hardware players.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

What role does government funding, subsidies, or tax incentives play in these business models?

Government incentives fundamentally reshape climate tech economics, with the Inflation Reduction Act providing over $1.2 trillion in uncapped tax credits that boost private investment by 3x.

Tax credits directly improve project economics for Energy-as-a-Service models, where companies can claim 30% Investment Tax Credits (ITC) for solar installations and 50% tax credits for energy storage systems. These credits either reduce the company's tax burden or can be sold to tax equity investors, improving project IRR by 3-5 percentage points.

Direct Air Capture companies benefit from $180 per ton tax credits under Section 45Q, making previously uneconomical projects financially viable. This represents 15-30% of total project revenue for companies like Climeworks and Carbon Engineering.

Grants and subsidies de-risk R&D and pilot projects, particularly through Department of Energy funding programs. The DOE allocated $3.5 billion for direct air capture hubs in 2024, enabling companies to demonstrate commercial viability before raising private capital.

Regulatory mandates create market pull by requiring carbon reduction or renewable energy adoption. California's carbon removal procurement targets and EU Emissions Trading Scheme carbon pricing generate guaranteed demand for climate tech solutions, reducing market risk for startups.

State-level incentives add another layer of support, with programs like New York's NY-Sun initiative providing additional rebates that stack with federal credits. These combined incentives can cover 50-70% of system costs for some technologies.

If you want actionable data about this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Which sectors within climate tech are growing fastest right now?

Agritech leads climate tech growth with 12.9% CAGR, driven by precision farming technologies and vertical farming adoption that reduces agricultural emissions while improving yields.

Carbon capture and storage achieves 16.7% CAGR growth through 2029, reaching $6.37 billion market size as direct air capture technologies achieve commercial scale and regulatory support increases. Companies like Climeworks and Carbon Engineering are scaling from pilot projects to industrial-scale facilities.

Energy storage experiences rapid expansion in long-duration technologies, particularly geothermal storage and thermal batteries that address grid-scale renewable energy intermittency. These solutions command premium pricing due to their ability to store energy for 8-100+ hours compared to 2-4 hours for lithium-ion batteries.

Alternative protein technologies grow 25-30% annually as companies like Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods scale production while reducing costs. This sector attracts significant investment due to its potential to reduce agricultural emissions by 75% while addressing growing protein demand.

Need a clear, elegant overview of a market? Browse our structured slide decks for a quick, visual deep dive.

Transportation electrification continues expanding beyond passenger vehicles into commercial trucks, marine vessels, and aviation. Companies developing electric truck charging infrastructure and sustainable aviation fuels experience 20-30% growth rates supported by regulatory mandates and corporate sustainability commitments.

How do companies that sell hardware structure their pricing and margins?

Climate tech hardware companies employ sophisticated pricing strategies that balance market competitiveness with margin requirements, often leveraging government incentives to improve customer economics.

Solar panel manufacturers like First Solar price products around $0.25 per watt, achieving 20-30% gross margins after factoring in Investment Tax Credits that customers receive. This pricing reflects significant cost reductions from manufacturing scale and technological improvements over the past decade.

EV charging infrastructure companies use tiered pricing models combining hardware sales with service contracts. Hardware margins typically range 20-25%, while ongoing service contracts generate 40-50% margins through maintenance, software updates, and network management fees.

Carbon capture equipment manufacturers like Neustark sell injection units for $2-5 million each, then participate in ongoing carbon credit revenue at $350-500 per ton. This hybrid approach provides immediate hardware revenue while sharing in project economics over 10-20 year operational periods.

Battery storage system manufacturers price products at $200-400 per kWh for utility-scale installations, with margins improving as manufacturing scales and supply chain costs decrease. Long-duration storage technologies command premium pricing of $500-800 per kWh due to their unique capability to store energy for extended periods.

Equipment financing partnerships help hardware companies improve customer acquisition by offering lease or Power Purchase Agreement options that eliminate upfront capital requirements. These arrangements often improve project economics for customers while creating recurring revenue streams for manufacturers.

How do software-based climate tech companies monetize their services?

Climate tech software companies primarily monetize through tiered subscription models, API usage fees, and seat-based licensing that scale with customer size and data processing requirements.

Tiered subscription pricing dominates the carbon accounting sector, with companies like Carbon Analytics charging $1,249 annually for small businesses up to $24,995 for enterprises. Pricing tiers typically differentiate based on employee count, emission sources tracked, and reporting capabilities required for regulatory compliance.

Seat-based licensing models scale pricing with user adoption, charging $50-200 per user per month for platforms like Persefoni and Sphera. This approach generates predictable revenue growth as organizations expand sustainability team access across departments.

API usage pricing applies to companies providing carbon calculation services, with Climatiq charging per API call for emission factor data. This consumption-based model aligns revenue with customer value while enabling integration into existing enterprise software systems.

Energy management software companies often combine subscription fees with usage-based charges for advanced analytics or grid optimization services. This hybrid approach generates base recurring revenue while capturing additional value from high-usage customers.

White-label licensing enables software companies to partner with consulting firms or system integrators, generating revenue through licensing fees while expanding market reach. Companies like Watershed license their carbon accounting platform to professional services firms that serve mid-market customers.

If you need to-the-point data on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What partnerships or ecosystem plays are enabling revenue growth?

Strategic partnerships create revenue multipliers for climate tech companies through OEM licensing, marketplace integrations, and embedded software solutions that expand addressable markets.

OEM licensing arrangements allow hardware companies to scale revenue without manufacturing investments. Climeworks licenses their direct air capture modules to partners like Carbon Engineering, generating royalty fees while accelerating technology deployment across multiple projects.

Marketplace integration partnerships connect complementary services, with carbon accounting software companies integrating with offset providers like Patch to offer customers seamless purchasing workflows. These partnerships typically involve revenue sharing arrangements of 5-15% per transaction.

ERP system integrations enable climate tech software to reach enterprise customers through existing workflows. Companies like Microsoft embed carbon accounting capabilities in their Sustainability Cloud, creating distribution channels that individual startups couldn't access independently.

Financial services partnerships help hardware companies offer customer financing solutions, expanding addressable markets by removing upfront capital barriers. Solar companies partner with banks and specialty finance providers to offer zero-down installations with Power Purchase Agreements.

Not sure where the investment opportunities are? See what's emerging and where the smart money is going.

System integrator partnerships enable software companies to serve enterprise customers requiring custom implementations. These arrangements typically involve upfront licensing fees plus ongoing support revenue, creating multi-year revenue streams from single customer relationships.

What types of climate tech business models are emerging now that could dominate by 2026?

Outcome-based contracts represent the most promising emerging model, where companies guarantee specific environmental results and receive payment only upon verified impact delivery.

Pay-for-performance solar contracts tie payments to actual kWh generated rather than system installation, shifting performance risk to service providers while reducing customer concerns about technology effectiveness. This model appeals to commercial customers seeking guaranteed energy cost reductions.

Nature-based solution platforms are developing automated verification systems for biodiversity and soil carbon credits using satellite imagery and IoT sensors. These platforms could scale carbon credit markets by reducing verification costs from $50-100 per credit to $5-10 per credit through automation.

Climate-as-a-Service bundles hardware, software, and financing into comprehensive solutions for small and medium enterprises. This model addresses the complexity barrier that prevents smaller companies from adopting climate technologies by providing turnkey sustainability solutions.

Circular economy marketplaces are emerging to facilitate waste material trading and reuse, with platforms like Eggify connecting manufacturers with waste streams that can become input materials. These platforms generate revenue through transaction fees while creating new revenue streams for waste generators.

Blockchain-based environmental asset tokenization enables fractional ownership of carbon credits, renewable energy certificates, and biodiversity credits. This model could democratize environmental investing while creating new liquidity sources for project developers.

How should someone entering this space evaluate the scalability and defensibility of a specific climate tech business model?

Evaluating climate tech business models requires analyzing capital intensity, regulatory moats, data advantages, network effects, and technology differentiation to determine long-term competitive positioning.

• Capital Intensity Analysis: Software models require minimal capital to scale compared to hardware businesses that need manufacturing facilities and inventory investment. SaaS companies can achieve 70-80% gross margins while hardware companies typically achieve 20-40% margins due to material and manufacturing costs.
• Regulatory Moats: Companies with secured long-term offtake agreements, regulatory compliance requirements, or tax credit eligibility create defensible competitive positions. Carbon accounting software benefits from mandatory ESG reporting requirements that create sticky customer relationships.
• Data Advantage Assessment: Proprietary datasets from satellite imagery, IoT sensor networks, or operational systems create competitive moats for software companies. Energy optimization platforms become more valuable as they accumulate building performance data that improves algorithm effectiveness.
• Network Effects Potential: Marketplace platforms and API-based services benefit from increasing user bases that attract more participants. Carbon credit marketplaces become more liquid and valuable as both buyers and sellers join the platform.
• Technology Differentiation: Novel capture materials, battery chemistries, or AI-driven optimization algorithms create temporary competitive advantages. However, technological moats require continuous R&D investment to maintain leadership positions as competitors develop alternative approaches.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

Successful climate tech companies often combine multiple defensive elements, such as Tesla's integration of manufacturing scale, charging network effects, and continuous software updates that create comprehensive competitive moats across the electric vehicle ecosystem.

Conclusion

Sources

1. AgriTech Global Market Report 2025
2. Carbon Capture Storage Market Research
3. Energy Climate Investment Report
4. Energy Service Business Model Analysis
5. CO2 Analytics Pricing
6. Climate Tech Revenue Europe Report
7. 8 CleanTech Business Models
8. Climate Tech Incentives Analysis
9. McKinsey Climate Tech Challenges
10. Silicon Valley Bank Climate Tech Report
11. Climeworks Direct Air Capture
12. Patch Carbon Marketplace
13. Sonnen Energy as a Service
14. Tesla Sustainable Energy
15. First Solar Technology