What's the pricing model for cybersecurity?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the cybersecurity market in a clean and beautiful presentation

The cybersecurity industry operates on fundamentally different pricing structures than traditional software markets, with recurring revenue models dominating and contract values varying dramatically by customer segment.

Understanding these pricing mechanisms is crucial for entrepreneurs seeking to build sustainable cybersecurity businesses and investors evaluating market opportunities. The shift toward managed services and outcome-based pricing has created new revenue streams while maintaining the predictable cash flows that make cybersecurity companies attractive investments.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

What are the main pricing models currently used in the cybersecurity industry?

Four dominant pricing models control the cybersecurity market, each designed to capture different customer segments and use cases.

Subscription-based pricing dominates with flat monthly or annual fees per user, device, or workload. This model provides predictable revenue streams and appeals to customers who prefer operational expense budgeting over capital expenditures. Software vendors like CrowdStrike and SentinelOne generate 70-90% of their revenue through this approach.

Per-user and per-device pricing scales directly with customer growth, making it attractive for endpoint protection, identity management, and SASE solutions. This model aligns vendor revenue with customer expansion but can create resistance during economic downturns when companies reduce headcount.

Usage-based pricing ties costs to actual consumption—data volumes scanned, API calls processed, or security events ingested. SIEM platforms and cloud security tools frequently use this model because it matches customer value perception with actual resource utilization.

Outcome-based pricing represents the newest evolution, linking fees to measurable security metrics like mean time to detection, incident response times, or breach prevention. This model is gaining traction in managed detection and response services where vendors can directly control security outcomes.

How do cybersecurity companies typically generate recurring revenue?

Cybersecurity companies have mastered recurring revenue generation through multiple complementary streams that create sticky customer relationships.

Software subscriptions form the foundation, representing 70-90% of revenue at established vendors. These subscriptions often include automatic updates, threat intelligence feeds, and basic support, creating ongoing value that justifies renewal. The shift from perpetual licensing to subscription models has dramatically improved cash flow predictability and customer lifetime value.

Managed services represent the highest-margin recurring revenue stream, with MSSPs and MDR providers often achieving 60-70% gross margins. These services bundle technology with human expertise, creating dependencies that are difficult for customers to replicate internally. Twenty-four-seven SOC operations, threat hunting, and incident response services command premium pricing because they address critical staffing shortages in cybersecurity.

Professional services and consulting create additional recurring touchpoints through vCISO arrangements, compliance audits, and incident response retainers. While typically lower-margin than software, these services increase customer stickiness and provide cross-selling opportunities.

Maintenance and support fees on legacy perpetual licenses still generate 20-30% of revenue for established vendors, though this stream is declining as customers migrate to cloud-based solutions.

If you want to build on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What's the average contract size for SMBs, mid-market, and enterprise customers?

Contract sizes vary dramatically across customer segments, reflecting both security needs complexity and budget constraints.

Which pricing strategies are most common—per user, per device, usage-based, or outcome-based?

Per-user and per-device pricing dominate the cybersecurity market, accounting for approximately 60% of all pricing models in 2025.

Per-user pricing works best for identity management, email security, and collaboration security tools where the value directly correlates with user count. Companies like Okta, Proofpoint, and Microsoft charge $3-15 per user monthly for basic tiers, scaling to $25-50 for premium features. This model creates natural expansion revenue as customer organizations grow.

Per-device pricing suits endpoint protection, mobile device management, and network security appliances. CrowdStrike charges $8-15 per endpoint monthly, while network security vendors often price per firewall, router, or access point. Device-based pricing works well when security value relates to asset protection rather than user activity.

Usage-based pricing captures roughly 25% of the market, primarily in cloud security, SIEM, and API protection. Splunk pioneered this approach in security analytics, charging per gigabyte of data ingested. Cloud security platforms often price per workload, container, or API call because costs scale with infrastructure complexity.

Outcome-based pricing remains niche but growing rapidly, representing about 15% of new contracts in managed services. Arctic Wolf and other MDR providers increasingly offer SLA-backed pricing with penalties for missing detection time targets and bonuses for exceeding performance metrics.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

What are the main differences in pricing between software-only vendors and managed security service providers?

Software-only vendors and MSSPs operate fundamentally different business models that drive distinct pricing approaches and customer value propositions.

Can you give examples of successful cybersecurity startups and how they structure their pricing models?

Leading cybersecurity startups have developed innovative pricing structures that align customer value with business growth, creating sustainable competitive advantages.

CrowdStrike pioneered the modern endpoint security pricing model with three distinct tiers: Falcon Prevent ($8.99/endpoint/month), Falcon Insight ($15.99/endpoint/month), and Falcon Complete ($25.99/endpoint/month). This tiered approach allows customers to start with basic protection and upgrade as security needs mature, creating natural expansion revenue.

Wiz disrupted cloud security pricing by charging based on actual cloud workloads rather than traditional per-seat models. Their consumption-based approach prices per container, virtual machine, or serverless function, aligning costs with customer cloud spending. This model resonates with cloud-native companies that prefer variable cost structures matching their infrastructure growth.

Lacework combines workload-based pricing with support tiers, charging $0.10-0.50 per monitored resource plus optional premium support packages. This hybrid approach captures both usage-based revenue and service-driven margins, appealing to customers who want predictable baseline costs with optional enhanced support.

Blumira exemplifies the emerging SOC-as-a-Service model, combining per-user licensing ($15/user/month) with per-device fees ($3/device/month) plus managed detection services ($5,000-15,000/month). This multi-dimensional pricing captures technology deployment costs while monetizing human expertise.

Wazuh demonstrates successful open-source monetization, offering free self-hosted deployment while charging for cloud-hosted tiers ($2-8/agent/month) and enterprise support packages. Their 10-15% conversion rate from free to paid users provides sustainable growth while maintaining community engagement.

If you want actionable data about this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Which cybersecurity business models are the most profitable right now in 2025?

Managed Detection and Response services generate the highest profitability in cybersecurity, achieving 60-70% gross margins while maintaining customer retention rates above 95%.

MDR providers like Arctic Wolf, Huntress, and Red Canary command premium pricing because they solve the critical cybersecurity talent shortage. These companies bundle technology with human expertise, creating value propositions that customers cannot easily replicate internally. The recurring nature of managed services, combined with long-term contracts and high switching costs, generates predictable cash flows that investors highly value.

Extended Detection and Response platforms represent the second-most profitable model, integrating endpoint, network, and cloud security into unified platforms. Companies like SentinelOne and Palo Alto Networks achieve software-like margins (80%+) while capturing larger wallet share through comprehensive security stacks. XDR reduces customer vendor fatigue while increasing average contract values by 40-60%.

Cloud-native security platforms targeting DevSecOps and infrastructure protection generate strong margins through usage-based pricing that scales with customer growth. Wiz, Lacework, and Prisma Cloud align revenue growth with customer cloud spending, creating natural expansion without requiring additional sales efforts.

Compliance-driven security bundles command premium pricing in regulated industries. Healthcare, financial services, and government customers pay 20-30% premiums for solutions that address specific regulatory requirements like HIPAA, PCI DSS, or FedRAMP. These customers exhibit extremely high retention rates due to regulatory lock-in effects.

Curious about how money is made in this sector? Explore the most profitable business models in our sleek decks.

What business models have gained the most market traction recently?

SOC-as-a-Service and Managed Detection Response models have captured the most market traction, growing 45-60% annually as organizations outsource security operations due to talent shortages.

Extended Detection and Response platforms gained significant adoption by consolidating multiple security tools into unified platforms. XDR addresses "tool sprawl" problems while reducing operational complexity, leading to 40% growth in platform adoption among mid-market and enterprise customers. The integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities further accelerates this trend.

API security platforms emerged as high-growth markets driven by digital transformation and microservices architectures. Companies like Salt Security and Traceable capture revenue through usage-based pricing tied to API call volumes, creating business models that scale automatically with customer digital growth.

Zero Trust Network Access solutions gained enterprise traction as remote work normalized. ZTNA providers like Zscaler and Palo Alto Prisma Access price per user for secure remote access, benefiting from permanent hybrid work policies and cloud migration trends.

Identity-first security platforms expanded beyond traditional access management to include identity threat detection and response. Companies like CrowdStrike Falcon Identity and SentinelOne Singularity Identity capture premium pricing by protecting the new security perimeter—user identities rather than network boundaries.

Are there freemium or open-source cybersecurity products that successfully convert to paid plans?

Several cybersecurity companies achieve sustainable conversion rates of 10-15% from free to paid users through strategic freemium and open-source models.

• Wazuh offers comprehensive free security monitoring for self-hosted deployments while monetizing through cloud-hosted SaaS tiers, enterprise support, and professional services. Their conversion strategy focuses on ease-of-use improvements and SLA-backed support that appeals to organizations lacking internal security expertise.
• CrowdSec provides free community threat intelligence and basic protection while charging for premium API usage, advanced analytics, and enterprise integrations. They convert users by demonstrating measurable threat blocking effectiveness and offering real-time security event data that free tiers cannot match.
• Elastic Security bundles free Elastic Agent deployment with premium X-Pack features for advanced SIEM capabilities. Their conversion lever focuses on official support, advanced machine learning analytics, and compliance reporting that enterprise customers require.
• Suricata maintains open-source intrusion detection while partner companies monetize through managed services, cloud hosting, and enterprise support packages. This ecosystem approach creates multiple monetization paths without compromising open-source community engagement.
• MISP (Malware Information Sharing Platform) offers free threat intelligence sharing while companies like CIRCL and other integrators charge for premium threat feeds, custom integrations, and managed services around the platform.

The most successful conversions occur when free tiers provide genuine value while paid tiers offer enterprise-grade reliability, support, and advanced features that justify budget allocation. Companies that focus on developer adoption first often achieve higher conversion rates than those targeting enterprise buyers directly.

If you need to-the-point data on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

How do compliance requirements influence pricing and packaging in cybersecurity?

Compliance requirements create premium pricing opportunities and drive specialized packaging strategies that can increase contract values by 20-30% above standard security offerings.

Modular compliance add-ons represent the most common approach, with vendors offering GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, and SOX-specific features as separate packages. These modules typically include enhanced logging, data residency controls, audit reporting, and policy enforcement capabilities. Customers pay premiums because compliance failures result in significant financial penalties and reputational damage.

Regulatory-specific tiers create dedicated service levels for compliance-heavy industries. Financial services customers often require 99.99% uptime SLAs, real-time fraud detection, and immediate incident notification capabilities that command 40-60% price premiums over standard enterprise packages. Healthcare organizations pay similar premiums for HIPAA-compliant data handling, breach notification automation, and patient privacy controls.

Continuous compliance subscriptions bundle ongoing audit support, policy updates, and regulatory change management into flat-fee packages. These services appeal to organizations that lack internal compliance expertise and prefer predictable costs over project-based consulting engagements.

Industry-specific certifications like FedRAMP, Common Criteria, or FIPS 140-2 create additional revenue streams through specialized deployment options. Government and critical infrastructure customers pay substantial premiums for certified solutions, often requiring dedicated infrastructure and enhanced support arrangements.

Geographic data residency requirements drive regional pricing variations and specialized service offerings. European customers pay premiums for EU-based data centers and GDPR-compliant processing, while customers in regulated jurisdictions like China or Russia require completely separate infrastructure and support models.

Which cybersecurity pricing models are expected to grow or emerge as trends heading into 2026?

Outcome-based pricing with measurable security metrics will emerge as the dominant trend, with penalties and bonuses tied to specific performance indicators like mean time to detection and incident response effectiveness.

AI-powered usage billing represents the next evolution in consumption-based pricing, where fees correlate with machine learning model inference units, automated response actions, or intelligence-driven security decisions. This model aligns costs with the actual computational resources required to deliver advanced security capabilities rather than simple data volume metrics.

Risk-score pricing introduces dynamic fee structures based on real-time organizational risk posture assessments. Companies with better security hygiene, fewer vulnerabilities, and stronger compliance scores receive pricing discounts, while higher-risk organizations pay premiums. This approach incentivizes good security practices while reflecting actual risk exposure.

Continuous compliance subscriptions will expand beyond traditional audit cycles to include real-time regulatory monitoring and automated policy updates. As regulations like the EU AI Act and various data localization requirements evolve rapidly, organizations will pay for services that ensure ongoing compliance without internal legal and security expertise.

Cyber insurance integration creates hybrid pricing models where security vendors partner with insurance providers to offer combined coverage and protection packages. Customers receive premium discounts for deploying specific security controls while vendors gain additional revenue streams through insurance partnerships.

Looking for growth forecasts without reading 60-page PDFs? Our slides give you just the essentials—beautifully presented.

How do customers typically evaluate ROI when deciding on cybersecurity solutions?

Cybersecurity ROI evaluation centers on comparing solution costs against average breach costs of $4.88 million, plus quantifying operational efficiency gains and compliance cost reductions.

Direct cost avoidance calculations form the primary ROI justification, with customers comparing annual security spending against potential breach costs including investigation fees, legal expenses, regulatory fines, and business disruption. Organizations typically justify spending 1-5% of IT budgets on security solutions when the math demonstrates clear cost avoidance relative to breach probability and impact.

Total Cost of Ownership reduction through managed services provides another key ROI metric. Building an internal Security Operations Center requires 8-12 full-time security analysts costing $120,000-180,000 annually each, plus technology infrastructure and training expenses. Managed SOC services costing $15,000-50,000 monthly often deliver superior coverage at lower total costs.

Operational efficiency gains drive ROI through automation of manual security tasks. Automated patch management saves approximately 20 hours monthly of system administrator time, while automated incident response can reduce investigation time from days to hours. These productivity improvements translate directly to labor cost savings and faster business recovery.

Compliance cost reduction represents significant ROI for regulated industries. Organizations spending $500,000-2,000,000 annually on compliance consulting, audit preparation, and regulatory reporting can reduce these costs by 30-50% through automated compliance platforms and continuous monitoring solutions.

Risk mitigation quantification increasingly uses actuarial approaches, calculating potential losses from specific threat scenarios and measuring how security investments reduce probability and impact. Cyber insurance premium reductions of 10-30% for organizations with strong security controls provide additional measurable ROI.

Conclusion

Sources

1. Framework Security - How Much Does Cybersecurity Really Cost
2. Securitribe - The Essentials of Cyber Security Pricing
3. Cynomi - Turning Cybersecurity Services into a Revenue Engine
4. Strategy of Security - Cybersecurity Business Models
5. Acronis - Cyber Protect Cloud Pricing and Packaging
6. Analysys Mason - Managed Security Spending
7. Clutch - Cybersecurity Pricing
8. Dafinchi AI - Zscaler Pricing Strategies
9. DataGr8 - Analyzing Cybersecurity Software Pricing Models
10. Corsica Tech - Cybersecurity Budget