What's the business model for DeFi protocols?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the DeFi protocols market in a clean and beautiful presentation

DeFi protocols have evolved from experimental smart contracts into billion-dollar revenue engines that challenge traditional finance through automated, permissionless systems.

These on-chain protocols generate substantial profits through trading fees, interest spreads, and token mechanisms while solving critical problems like limited access, opacity, and centralized control that plague legacy financial systems. By 2025, the most successful DeFi business models center on sustainable fee structures rather than unsustainable token emissions.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

What Does a DeFi Protocol Actually Do and What Problem Is It Solving?

DeFi protocols are automated smart contract systems that replace traditional financial intermediaries like banks, brokers, and clearinghouses with code-based alternatives.

These protocols solve five fundamental problems that plague traditional finance. First, they eliminate organizational inefficiencies by removing layers of bureaucracy and manual processes—a DEX like Uniswap executes trades instantly without requiring multiple intermediaries. Second, they democratize access by allowing anyone with an internet connection to participate regardless of geography, wealth, or credit history.

Third, DeFi protocols provide complete transparency through open-source code and on-chain transaction history, eliminating the opacity that characterizes traditional banking. Fourth, they distribute control through governance tokens and DAOs rather than centralized decision-making by corporate boards. Finally, they enable composability—protocols can integrate seamlessly with each other, creating "money legos" that unlock innovative financial products impossible in traditional systems.

The most successful protocols focus on specific financial functions: Aave handles lending and borrowing, Uniswap facilitates token swaps, and Lido manages liquid staking. Each addresses clear pain points—Aave provides instant loans without credit checks, Uniswap enables 24/7 trading of any token, and Lido allows staking rewards while maintaining liquidity.

Need a clear, elegant overview of a market? Browse our structured slide decks for a quick, visual deep dive.

How Do DeFi Protocols Make Money Today—What Are the Main Revenue Streams?

DeFi protocols generate revenue through five primary mechanisms, with fee-based models proving most sustainable compared to token emission strategies.

Trading fees represent the largest revenue source, with DEXs collecting 0.01% to 0.3% per transaction. Uniswap V3 generates approximately $200 million annually through these fees, with portions distributed to liquidity providers and protocol treasuries. Interest rate spreads provide steady income for lending protocols—when Aave charges borrowers 8% while paying depositors 5%, the 3% spread flows to the protocol.

Flash loan fees offer high-margin revenue streams, with Aave charging 0.09% on uncollateralized loans that must be repaid within the same transaction. These loans generated $12 million in fees for Aave in 2024 despite requiring no collateral. Performance fees from yield optimization create alignment between protocols and users—Yearn Finance charges 20% of profits generated above benchmark returns.

Token emissions and treasury sales provide initial funding but prove unsustainable long-term. Protocols that rely heavily on token inflation often face "death spirals" when emissions exceed genuine value creation. The most profitable protocols in 2025 have transitioned away from emission-dependent models toward fee-based revenue that scales with actual usage.

Treasury management represents an emerging revenue source, with protocols earning yield on idle funds through staking, bonds, and DeFi investments. MakerDAO's treasury earned $15 million in 2024 from real-world asset investments, diversifying beyond protocol-specific revenues.

If you want to build on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What Are the Core Business Models Used by Successful DeFi Protocols in 2025?

Seven distinct business models dominate the DeFi landscape, each optimized for specific financial functions and user needs.

Which Specific Protocols Are the Most Profitable Right Now and Why?

December 2024 revenue data reveals clear leaders across different DeFi categories, with synthetic asset protocols unexpectedly dominating monthly earnings.

Ethena leads with $56.9 million monthly revenue from its synthetic dollar (USDe) protocol, capturing 25% of its annual revenue in a single month. The protocol generates fees by managing delta-neutral positions that earn funding rates while maintaining dollar parity. Sky (formerly MakerDAO) follows with $40 million monthly from DAI stability fees and real-world asset yields, demonstrating the profitability of established lending protocols.

Aerodrome Finance earned $38 million in December 2024 by becoming the dominant DEX on Base chain, capturing high trading volumes through aggressive liquidity incentives and ve-token mechanics. Aave generated $13.6 million (16.7% of annual revenue) through lending fees and flash loans across multiple chains, while Lido earned $9.6 million (9.3% of annual revenue) from liquid staking fees on Ethereum, Polygon, and Solana.

These top performers share common characteristics: they focus on essential financial primitives (lending, trading, staking), maintain sustainable fee structures rather than relying on token emissions, and operate across multiple chains to maximize market capture. Revenue concentration in these protocols reflects network effects—success attracts more liquidity, which generates higher fees and attracts even more users.

Wondering who's shaping this fast-moving industry? Our slides map out the top players and challengers in seconds.

Which DeFi Business Models Have Proven to Be the Most Scalable and Sustainable Over Time?

Four business models have demonstrated superior scalability and sustainability through multiple market cycles: trading fee-based DEXs, interest rate-based lending protocols, liquid staking services, and performance-fee yield aggregators.

DEXs with trading fee models prove most resilient because fees scale directly with volume regardless of market conditions. Uniswap maintained profitability through the 2022 bear market while token-emission-dependent protocols struggled. The model's sustainability stems from providing essential infrastructure—users need token swaps regardless of market sentiment, generating consistent fee revenue.

Lending protocols demonstrate scalability through algorithmic interest rate adjustments that automatically balance supply and demand. When borrowing demand increases, rates rise to attract more deposits, creating self-balancing mechanisms. Aave's revenue grew 300% from 2022 to 2024 by expanding across 8 blockchain networks, proving the model's scalability across different ecosystems.

Liquid staking protocols benefit from sustainable base yields (3-5% on Ethereum) plus composability premiums as staked tokens integrate into other DeFi protocols. Lido's revenue model scales with overall staking adoption rather than speculative trading, providing more predictable income streams. Performance-fee yield aggregators align incentives by only earning when users profit, creating sustainable relationships that persist through market cycles.

The least sustainable models rely heavily on token emissions to subsidize user activity. These protocols face "death spirals" when emission costs exceed genuine value creation, leading to token price collapse and user exodus.

What Are Some Real-World Use Cases for Each of the Main DeFi Business Models?

Each DeFi business model addresses specific real-world financial needs that extend beyond cryptocurrency speculation.

• Lending Protocols: Crypto traders access leverage without selling holdings (tax efficiency), institutions earn yield on dormant assets, and businesses obtain working capital loans. Aave provides $2 billion in active loans supporting trading strategies, yield farming, and liquidity provision.
• Decentralized Exchanges: International businesses swap currencies without banking intermediaries, DeFi protocols exchange governance tokens, and users access tokens unavailable on centralized exchanges. Uniswap processes $100 billion annually in cross-border value transfer.
• Derivatives: Farmers hedge crop prices using synthetic commodities, traders speculate on asset prices with leverage, and institutions create portfolio hedges. GMX enables leveraged trading on cryptocurrencies, forex, and commodities without traditional brokerage accounts.
• Liquid Staking: Pension funds earn staking rewards while maintaining liquidity for rebalancing, validators stake through pools for geographic diversification, and DeFi protocols earn yield on treasury assets. Lido's stETH integrates into 200+ DeFi protocols for additional yield.
• Yield Aggregators: DAOs automate treasury management across multiple protocols, retail investors access institutional-grade strategies, and protocols optimize their own reserve yields. Yearn manages $500 million across 40+ strategies automatically.
• Real-World Assets: Traditional investors access tokenized bonds and real estate, emerging markets access dollar-denominated savings accounts, and institutions fractionally own expensive assets. MakerDAO's RWA vaults provide exposure to US Treasury bills through on-chain protocols.

If you want actionable data about this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Who Are the Current Top Players and Startups in Each Category?

The DeFi landscape features established giants alongside emerging challengers, with clear leaders dominating each vertical through first-mover advantages and network effects.

How Do Tokenomics Play a Role in the Revenue and Growth Strategy of a DeFi Project?

Tokenomics design determines whether protocols achieve sustainable growth or fall into unsustainable emission-dependent cycles that ultimately lead to failure.

Successful protocols use tokens for three primary functions: governance rights, fee capture mechanisms, and growth bootstrapping. Governance tokens like UNI and AAVE provide holders with voting power over protocol parameters, fee distribution, and treasury management. Fee capture occurs through buyback-and-burn mechanisms, revenue sharing, or staking rewards tied to protocol performance.

The most effective tokenomics models align token value with protocol success rather than artificial scarcity. Curve's veCRV model exemplifies this—users lock tokens for longer periods to receive higher rewards and governance power, creating sustainable demand tied to protocol usage. GMX distributes 70% of protocol fees to token stakers, directly linking token value to trading volume and revenue.

Growth bootstrapping through token emissions requires careful balance—sufficient incentives to attract initial users without creating unsustainable inflation. Protocols typically reduce emission rates over time as organic revenue grows. Lido decreased token emissions from 5% to 1% annually as staking revenue became self-sustaining.

Failed tokenomics usually involve excessive emissions without sustainable revenue, creating "vampire attack" vulnerability where users extract maximum tokens before moving to newer protocols. The most sustainable protocols transition from emission-dependent to fee-dependent models within 2-3 years of launch.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

What Are the Most Common Go-to-Market Strategies for Launching and Growing a DeFi Protocol?

DeFi protocols employ five core go-to-market strategies, with community-building and liquidity incentives proving most critical for initial traction.

Community-first strategies build engaged user bases before protocol launch through Discord servers, Twitter engagement, and educational content. Successful protocols like Uniswap and Aave cultivated developer communities for months before mainnet deployment, creating organic advocates who drive initial adoption. Educational content targeting specific use cases (yield farming tutorials, lending guides) attracts users searching for financial solutions.

Liquidity mining programs incentivize early adopters through token rewards, but require careful economic design to avoid mercenary capital. Compound's COMP distribution created the liquidity mining trend, but many copycat programs failed by offering unsustainable yields. Successful programs gradually reduce emissions while increasing organic fee generation.

Strategic partnerships accelerate growth through integration and cross-protocol compatibility. Lido's partnerships with DeFi protocols enable stETH usage across 200+ applications, multiplying utility beyond simple staking. Cross-chain deployment strategies target specific ecosystems—Aerodrome's Base focus captured trading volume as the L2 ecosystem grew.

Influencer and thought leadership campaigns reach target audiences through crypto-native channels. Technical blog posts, protocol documentation, and conference presentations establish credibility with developers and power users who drive initial adoption. Targeted Twitter campaigns and podcast sponsorships reach retail investors seeking yield opportunities.

Bug bounty programs and security audits build trust essential for DeFi adoption. Protocols allocate 1-5% of treasuries to security initiatives, recognizing that smart contract exploits can destroy projects overnight. Public audit reports and ongoing bug bounties signal commitment to user fund safety.

If you need to-the-point data on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

How Is Value Captured and Distributed Among Stakeholders—Founders, Users, Investors, Token Holders?

Value distribution in DeFi protocols follows distinct allocation models that balance stakeholder incentives while ensuring protocol sustainability and growth.

Founders typically receive 10-20% of token supply through vesting schedules spanning 2-4 years, aligning long-term incentives with protocol success. Successful protocols like Uniswap allocated 21.51% to team and advisors with 4-year vesting, ensuring founders remain committed during critical growth phases. Equity investments in protocol teams provide additional value capture outside token allocations.

Users receive value through multiple mechanisms: yield rewards, fee rebates, governance token airdrops, and access to exclusive features. Uniswap's retrospective airdrop distributed 15% of supply to historical users, creating massive value for early adopters. Ongoing rewards programs typically allocate 30-50% of token supply to user incentives over 5-10 years.

Investors access value through token presales, SAFT agreements, and equity investments in development teams. Early investors typically receive 15-25% of token supply at significant discounts, with vesting periods preventing immediate dumping. Strategic investors often provide additional value through partnerships, integrations, and market access.

Token holders capture value through governance rights, fee revenue sharing, and token appreciation. GMX distributes 70% of protocol fees to staked token holders, providing direct revenue exposure. Buyback-and-burn mechanisms like those used by Binance and PancakeSwap create deflationary pressure supporting token prices.

Protocol treasuries retain 20-40% of token supply for future development, partnerships, and emergency reserves. These treasuries fund ongoing development, security audits, and strategic initiatives while providing governance flexibility for future needs.

Which DeFi Business Models Are Expected to Emerge or Become Dominant in 2026?

Four emerging business models are positioned to capture significant market share in 2026: modular DeFi infrastructure, AI-driven protocols, real-world asset integration, and institutional DeFi services.

Modular DeFi architectures separate execution, settlement, and data availability layers, enabling specialized optimization for each function. Projects like EigenLayer create restaking infrastructure that secures multiple protocols simultaneously, generating fees from each service. Execution layer specialists focus on high-throughput trading, while settlement layers optimize for security and finality.

AI-integrated protocols (DeFAI) automate complex strategies previously requiring manual intervention. These systems dynamically adjust parameters, optimize yield strategies, and manage risk across multiple protocols simultaneously. Early examples include automated market making with ML-driven pricing and yield farming strategies that adapt to changing market conditions in real-time.

Real-world asset tokenization infrastructure enables traditional assets like bonds, real estate, and commodities to integrate with DeFi protocols. MakerDAO's RWA integration demonstrates the potential—$2 billion in tokenized Treasury bills provide stable yield while diversifying protocol revenue. Institutional-grade custody and compliance infrastructure will expand this model to larger asset classes.

Institutional DeFi services target traditional finance institutions requiring regulatory compliance, professional custody, and institutional-grade risk management. These hybrid CeFi-DeFi models provide permissioned access to DeFi yields while maintaining regulatory compliance. Revenue models include higher fees for compliance overhead and premium services for institutional clients.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

What Are the Key Risks and Regulatory Pressures That Could Impact Each Business Model Going Forward?

DeFi protocols face escalating regulatory scrutiny and technical risks that could fundamentally reshape business models and operational approaches.

Smart contract risks remain the most immediate threat, with $3.8 billion lost to exploits in 2024 across various protocols. Lending protocols face liquidation cascade risks during market volatility, while DEXs struggle with MEV extraction and sandwich attacks that reduce user returns. Cross-chain bridge vulnerabilities have resulted in over $2 billion in losses, threatening multi-chain expansion strategies.

Regulatory pressures intensify across major jurisdictions, with the EU's MiCA regulation requiring stablecoin reserves and operational licenses for DeFi protocols serving European users. The US SEC considers many governance tokens as securities, potentially requiring registration and compliance for token sales and distributions. AML/KYC requirements may force protocols to implement user identification, fundamentally altering permissionless design principles.

Market structure risks include liquidity fragmentation across multiple chains, mercenary capital flowing between incentive programs, and institutional reluctance to adopt protocols lacking regulatory clarity. The concentration of liquidity in few major protocols creates systemic risks—Lido's 90% dominance in liquid staking raises centralization concerns that could trigger regulatory intervention.

Operational risks encompass key personnel dependency, governance token concentration among whale holders, and treasury management challenges during bear markets. Many protocols lack sufficient runway to survive extended downturns without sustainable revenue streams, creating pressure to implement potentially harmful monetization strategies.

Technical scalability constraints limit growth potential, with Ethereum's high gas costs pushing activity to alternative chains and L2 solutions, fragmenting liquidity and complicating user experience. Cross-chain compatibility challenges prevent seamless protocol integration across different blockchain ecosystems.

Conclusion

Sources

1. Duke University - DeFi Problems Analysis
2. Investopedia - Decentralized Finance Guide
3. The Blockchain - What is a DeFi Protocol
4. DeFi.io - How DeFi Platforms Make Money
5. Crypto.com - DeFi Protocol Earnings
6. Haven1 - DeFi Revenue Models
7. CryptoSlate - Top DeFi Protocol Revenue December 2024
8. Alexa Blockchain - DeFi Marketing Strategies
9. GrowthChain - DeFi Marketing Strategies
10. Mirror - DeFi Modular Infrastructure
11. Dev.to - DeFi Broker Models
12. TokenMinds - DeFi Trends
13. Bankless - Best DeFi Business Models
14. Gate.io - DeFi Revenue Generation