What development security gaps need closing?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the DevSecOps market in a clean and beautiful presentation

Development security gaps have reached critical levels in 2025, with vulnerability exploitation rising 34% year-over-year and supply-chain breaches doubling to 30% of all incidents.

The secure development market presents massive opportunities, with projected growth to $12 billion by 2026 and best-performing companies dedicating 8-10% of development budgets to security measures. Java/Maven ecosystems remain the highest-risk dependencies with 62-day average patch times, while secrets management failures drive breach costs averaging $4.88 million.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

What are the most exploited vulnerabilities in development environments right now?

Vulnerability exploitation has become the dominant attack vector in 2025, rising 34% year-over-year to account for 20% of all breaches.

Edge device and VPN vulnerabilities have seen an eight-fold increase in exploitation, as attackers shift focus from credential-based attacks to direct exploitation of unpatched systems. This represents a fundamental change in threat landscape priorities, with attackers preferring high-impact, low-effort vectors in development environments.

Supply-chain attacks have doubled to represent 30% of breaches, targeting third-party CI/CD tools and development extensions. The concentration of risk in development environments makes them particularly attractive targets, as compromising a single build pipeline can affect multiple downstream applications and customers.

Ransomware operators have adapted their tactics, with 88% now targeting small and medium businesses through development environment compromises. The average time to patch critical vulnerabilities in development tools remains 32 days, providing substantial windows for exploitation.

Configuration errors in cloud development environments represent another major exploitation vector, with misconfigured S3 buckets, exposed API keys, and overprivileged service accounts creating easy entry points for attackers.

Which security gaps caused the biggest financial damage this year?

Open-source dependency vulnerabilities have driven the largest financial losses, with Java/Maven ecosystems representing the highest-risk category.

44% of Java services contain known-exploited vulnerabilities compared to just 2% in other programming ecosystems. The extended patch cycles in Java environments—averaging 62 days versus 19 days for npm packages—create prolonged exposure windows that attackers actively exploit. Log4Shell-style mass exploitation events continue to generate multi-million dollar incident response costs across affected organizations.

Secrets management failures have resulted in 57% of organizations experiencing security incidents within the past two years. Exposed CI/CD credentials, hardcoded API keys, and leaked database passwords have enabled ransomware deployments averaging $4.88 million in total costs per incident. The median time to detect and remediate exposed secrets remains 32 days, during which attackers can establish persistent access and move laterally through development environments.

Need a clear, elegant overview of a market? Browse our structured slide decks for a quick, visual deep dive.

Supply-chain compromises through third-party development tools have generated reputational damage often exceeding direct financial costs. Organizations face customer churn, regulatory scrutiny, and competitive disadvantage following high-profile supply-chain incidents, with total impact calculations reaching tens of millions in lost business value.

If you want to build on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

How are successful companies securing their CI/CD pipelines?

Leading technology companies have converged on multi-layered pipeline security approaches that embed security controls directly into development workflows.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) integration at pre-commit stages has become standard practice. Companies using SonarQube, Checkmarx, and similar tools in GitHub Actions workflows report 40% faster patch deployment cycles and significantly reduced critical vulnerability escape rates into production environments.

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) and Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) enforcement represent the most effective approaches to dependency management. Organizations implementing Snyk, Aqua Security, and CycloneDX SBOM generation report catching vulnerable libraries before build completion, with automated dependency updates reducing mean time to patch from weeks to hours.

Supply Chain Levels for Software Artifacts (SLSA) implementation has emerged as the gold standard for pipeline integrity. Companies achieving SLSA Level 2 or higher report virtually eliminating build tampering incidents and achieving compliance with emerging regulatory requirements. Code signing, role-based access controls, and immutable build artifacts form the foundation of effective SLSA implementations.

Container security through minimal base images has proven particularly effective, with organizations using stripped-down container images reporting 40% faster security patch deployment and reduced attack surface area. Alpine Linux and Google Distroless images have become preferred choices for security-conscious organizations.

What types of security incidents are increasing most rapidly?

Ransomware and espionage-motivated attacks represent the fastest-growing incident categories, with distinct patterns emerging in 2025.

What regulatory changes are reshaping secure development practices?

2025 has marked a watershed year for secure development regulations, with mandatory SBOM requirements and NIST Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF) alignment becoming standard across major markets.

The US Executive Order on Software Bill of Materials now requires all federal software suppliers to provide comprehensive SBOM documentation, driving private sector adoption as contractors implement these practices across their entire development portfolios. The EU Cyber Resilience Act has similarly mandated NIST SSDF alignment for any software products sold within European markets, effectively creating global compliance standards.

2026 expectations include expanded Supply Chain Levels for Software Artifacts (SLSA) compliance requirements, with Level 2 certification becoming mandatory for government contracts and Level 3 strongly encouraged for critical infrastructure software. Automated compliance attestations integrated directly into CI/CD pipelines will become required rather than optional, forcing organizations to implement continuous compliance monitoring.

Vulnerability disclosure requirements are becoming more stringent, with proposed 2026 regulations requiring runtime vulnerability context in Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) reporting. This will fundamentally change how organizations prioritize and communicate security risks, shifting from theoretical CVSS scores to evidence-based exploitation likelihood.

Financial services regulations are expanding beyond traditional data protection to include specific secure development requirements, with banks and fintech companies now required to demonstrate continuous security testing and automated remediation capabilities.

Where are development teams most under-investing in security?

Secrets management represents the most critical under-investment area, with quantifiable consequences including 32-day median patch times and $4.88 million average breach costs.

Only 43% of organizations have implemented automated secrets scanning in their CI/CD pipelines, despite secrets-related incidents affecting 57% of companies in the past two years. The gap between awareness and implementation stems from the complexity of retrofitting secrets management into existing development workflows and the perceived disruption to developer productivity.

Dependency scanning suffers from insufficient coverage and poor integration with development workflows. Organizations lacking comprehensive Software Composition Analysis (SCA) experience 30% higher exploit rates in high-risk repositories, yet only 38% have implemented automated dependency vulnerability scanning across all projects. The Java/Maven ecosystem presents particular challenges, with organizations averaging 62 days to patch vulnerable dependencies compared to 19 days for npm packages.

Threat modeling remains absent in 60% of development teams, correlating with 20% higher security incident rates. The manual, time-intensive nature of traditional threat modeling conflicts with agile development practices, creating a persistent gap in proactive security planning.

Wondering who's shaping this fast-moving industry? Our slides map out the top players and challengers in seconds.

Container security receives inadequate attention despite widespread containerization adoption, with 67% of organizations running containers with known high-severity vulnerabilities. Base image scanning, runtime protection, and container configuration validation remain under-implemented across development environments.

If you want clear data about this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

How much should companies budget for secure development?

Best-performing organizations allocate 8-10% of their total development budgets to security tooling, training, and compliance activities, significantly exceeding the industry average of 5.7% of IT spend on security.

Return on investment calculations demonstrate clear financial benefits, with AI-driven security automation reducing average breach costs by $2.2 million per incident. Organizations implementing comprehensive secure development practices report total cost avoidance of $1.5-2.2 million per $10 million invested in security tooling and training programs.

Security training investments yield particularly strong returns, with interactive secure coding programs delivering 50× ROI on phishing prevention alone. Gamified security awareness platforms cost approximately $150-300 per developer annually but reduce security incident rates by 35-50% within the first year of implementation.

Tooling costs vary significantly by organization size and complexity, with enterprise-grade SAST, DAST, and SCA platforms ranging from $50,000-500,000 annually for comprehensive coverage. However, open-source alternatives and cloud-native solutions enable smaller organizations to achieve similar security outcomes at 60-80% lower costs.

Compliance automation represents an emerging budget category, with organizations anticipating 15-25% increases in compliance-related spending as SLSA, SBOM, and continuous attestation requirements become mandatory. Early investment in automated compliance workflows provides significant cost advantages compared to manual compliance approaches.

Which open source ecosystems present the highest security risks?

Java and Maven ecosystems consistently demonstrate the highest security risks, with 44% of Java services containing known-exploited vulnerabilities compared to 2% in other programming languages.

What's the projected market size for secure development solutions?

The secure software development lifecycle market is projected to reach $12 billion by 2026, representing a compound annual growth rate exceeding 12% from current levels.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Software Composition Analysis (SCA) represent the fastest-growing subsegments, driven by regulatory compliance requirements and increased awareness of supply-chain risks. AI-powered vulnerability prioritization solutions are emerging as a high-growth category, with market projections suggesting 25-30% annual growth as organizations seek to reduce alert fatigue and focus remediation efforts.

Container security solutions represent a $2.8 billion addressable market by 2026, with particular strength in Kubernetes-native security platforms and runtime protection solutions. The convergence of DevOps and security practices continues to drive demand for integrated toolchains that provide security visibility without disrupting development velocity.

Geographic distribution shows North American markets leading adoption at 45% of global spending, followed by European markets at 32% driven by regulatory compliance requirements. Asia-Pacific markets represent the fastest growth opportunity, with 35% projected annual increases as regional technology companies adopt secure development practices.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

Compliance automation and attestation platforms represent an emerging high-growth opportunity, with projected market expansion to $1.5 billion by 2027 as SLSA and SBOM requirements become universal across government and enterprise contracts.

If you want to build or invest on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What are the biggest gaps in developer security training?

Developer security awareness suffers from scalability challenges and lack of hands-on, contextual training approaches that integrate with modern development workflows.

56% of development teams exhibit critical security misconfigurations, while 21% of organizations remain unsure whether they've experienced security breaches—indicating fundamental visibility and awareness deficits. Traditional security training programs fail to address the specific challenges of cloud-native development, containerized applications, and modern CI/CD practices.

Threat modeling represents the most significant knowledge gap, with only 40% of developers receiving practical training in identifying and mitigating application-specific threats. The abstract nature of traditional threat modeling conflicts with the rapid iteration cycles of agile development, requiring new approaches that embed threat analysis into existing development tools and workflows.

Secure coding practices remain inconsistently applied across programming languages and frameworks, with developers lacking access to real-time guidance during code development. Interactive, gamified training platforms demonstrate 3-5× higher engagement rates compared to traditional video-based training, yet remain under-adopted across the industry.

Incident response and security communication skills represent emerging training requirements, as developers increasingly participate in security incident investigation and remediation activities. Organizations report significant improvements in mean time to resolution when developers receive training in security investigation techniques and cross-functional collaboration during incident response.

Which startups are innovating in secure development?

The secure development startup ecosystem has attracted significant venture investment, with several companies achieving substantial funding rounds and demonstrating strong early traction.

• Snyk (Series F, $450 million): Pioneered developer-first Software Composition Analysis with IDE integrations and automated pull request generation for vulnerability fixes. Achieved over 3 million developers on the platform and partnerships with major cloud providers.
• Wiz (Series E, $300 million): Cloud-native application security posture management with real-time vulnerability correlation across cloud infrastructure. Reached $350 million ARR within four years and expanded into container and Kubernetes security.
• Cycode (Series B, $60 million): Code integrity and supply chain security platform focusing on end-to-end pipeline protection. Developed AI-powered threat detection and automated remediation workflows for development environments.
• GitGuardian (Series B, $56 million): Secrets detection and remediation platform with comprehensive coverage across development tools and cloud environments. Achieved integration with 30+ development platforms and serves over 400,000 developers.
• Mondoo (Series A, $30 million): Risk-based vulnerability assessment with automated compliance checking across cloud infrastructure and applications. Focused on continuous compliance and policy-as-code approaches.
• Stackhawk (Acquired by Veracode): Dynamic Application Security Testing integrated into CI/CD pipelines with developer-friendly vulnerability reporting and automated testing workflows.
• Socket Security (Series A, $20 million): Supply chain security for open source dependencies with behavioral analysis and malware detection in package repositories.

What do CISOs and engineering leaders need most?

Chief Information Security Officers and engineering leaders consistently report three critical unmet needs: contextualized vulnerability prioritization, unified security visibility, and automated remediation workflows that scale with high-growth, distributed teams.

Contextualized vulnerability prioritization represents the most pressing requirement, as organizations struggle with alert fatigue from traditional CVSS-based scoring systems. Leaders demand runtime-aware vulnerability assessment that considers actual exploitability, business impact, and remediation complexity. Only 18% of critical vulnerabilities merit immediate attention according to recent analysis, yet current tools fail to provide this level of discrimination.

Unified security dashboards that integrate Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), and runtime alerts remain elusive despite significant vendor promises. Engineering leaders require single-pane visibility that correlates security findings across the entire development lifecycle without requiring security specialists to interpret results.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

Automated remediation workflows represent the most significant operational challenge for scaling organizations. Leaders need policy-driven security fixes integrated into pull request workflows, with automatic dependency updates, configuration corrections, and code suggestions that maintain development velocity while improving security posture.

Remote and distributed team management creates additional complexity, with security leaders struggling to maintain consistent security practices across geographically dispersed development teams. Cloud-native security training, asynchronous collaboration tools, and automated compliance checking become essential for maintaining security standards in distributed development environments.

Conclusion

Sources

1. Flashpoint - Key Trends Vulnerability Exploitation Ransomware Insights 2025 Verizon DBIR
2. Help Net Security - Verizon 2025 Data Breach Investigations Report
3. Datadog - DevSecOps 2025 Study Learnings
4. OX Security - CI/CD Pipeline Security
5. Help Net Security - Datadog State of DevSecOps 2025
6. JumpCloud - Cybersecurity ROI
7. Elisity - Cybersecurity Budget Benchmarks for 2025
8. DRJ - Vulnerability Forecast for 2025
9. Cybersecurity Insiders - Web Application Security Report 2025
10. Chef - DevSecOps in 2025 AI Powered Future
11. Datadog - State of DevOps 2025
12. SentinelOne - CI/CD Security Tools
13. RazorOps - Top 10 Security Tools for CI/CD Process
14. VentureBeat - Forrester Cybersecurity Budgeting 2025