How do embedded finance providers monetize?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the embedded finance market in a clean and beautiful presentation

Embedded finance represents a $305 billion market where non-financial companies integrate banking, payments, lending, and insurance directly into their platforms.

Providers capture value through diverse revenue streams including interchange fees, transaction spreads, interest income, and SaaS licensing, with interchange-driven models proving most capital-efficient while embedded lending offers the highest yields.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

What exactly is embedded finance and how does it fit into broader financial services ecosystems?

Embedded finance integrates financial services directly into non-financial platforms through APIs, creating seamless "moment of need" experiences for end users.

The ecosystem operates as a value web rather than a linear chain, with four key participants capturing different revenue streams. Financial institutions provide licensed balance sheets and regulatory compliance while accessing new distribution channels at 4× lower customer acquisition costs than e-commerce and 30× lower than traditional retail banking.

Customer interfaces like retailers, marketplaces, and SaaS platforms embed these services to increase revenue per customer by 2-5× while improving user experience and retention. Middleware providers such as Unit, Solarisbank, and Stripe supply the API infrastructure, compliance tools, and integration capabilities, earning setup fees, licensing revenue, and transaction-based commissions.

End customers benefit from frictionless access to financial services without leaving their preferred platforms, resulting in faster onboarding, personalized offerings based on transaction data, and contextual delivery of banking, payments, lending, or insurance exactly when needed.

Need a clear, elegant overview of a market? Browse our structured slide decks for a quick, visual deep dive.

What types of companies typically become embedded finance providers and what roles do they play?

Embedded finance providers fall into three distinct categories, each capturing value at different points in the financial services stack.

Balance-sheet firms include traditional banks and licensed fintechs that originate deposits, loans, and cards while providing regulatory compliance. Examples include Goldman Sachs powering Stripe Capital's lending, Solarisbank partnering with Contis for pan-European BaaS, and Sutton Bank enabling Square Banking's checking accounts and business lending products.

Technology platform providers offer modular APIs and infrastructure without holding financial licenses. Unit provides zero-build embedded capital and banking solutions, SDK.finance delivers plug-and-play fintech stacks, and Stripe's Treasury and Issuing products enable other companies to embed banking and card services without becoming banks themselves.

Distributor platforms integrate financial services into vertical-specific experiences, capturing the customer relationship while partnering with licensed entities. Square combines Sutton Bank's banking license with its own payment processing to offer merchants comprehensive financial services, while Shopify leverages Stripe's infrastructure to provide Balance accounts that earn APY rewards and interchange revenue from embedded debit cards.

If you want to build on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

How do embedded finance providers generate revenue through different fee structures?

Embedded finance providers monetize through six primary revenue mechanisms, often combining multiple approaches to maximize profitability per customer relationship.

Interchange revenue sharing represents the most capital-efficient model, where providers earn 0.2-1% of card transaction volume with minimal upfront investment. Transaction processing fees follow a straightforward per-transaction structure, with companies like Square charging 2.6% plus 10 cents per swipe while sharing interchange revenue with card networks.

Interest income from embedded lending offers the highest yield potential, with providers earning spreads between their cost of funds and loan rates ranging from 8-25% APR depending on risk profiles. SaaS licensing models charge monthly or annual fees for platform access, typically ranging from $50-$500 per month per client for BaaS infrastructure.

Commission structures apply primarily to embedded insurance, where providers capture 10-30% of premium values. Float income allows providers to earn interest on deposited customer funds, typically generating 2-5% APY spreads that compound as account balances grow.

Revenue sharing arrangements with white-label partners often follow 70/30 splits, where the technology provider retains 30% while the branded platform captures 70% of total fees generated.

What are the most common monetization models across different embedded finance verticals?

Each embedded finance vertical has developed distinct monetization approaches based on transaction patterns, regulatory requirements, and customer behavior characteristics.

Can you provide specific examples of companies successfully implementing each monetization model?

Leading embedded finance companies demonstrate how different monetization approaches can be optimized for specific use cases and customer segments.

Stripe exemplifies the transaction fee model through Connect, processing billions in volume while earning 0.25-2.9% per transaction, plus additional interchange revenue from Issuing products that enable other companies to launch card programs. Square combines multiple revenue streams by charging merchants 2.6% plus 10 cents for payment processing while earning float income on Square Banking deposits and interchange revenue from business debit cards.

Shopify's Capital program, powered by Stripe's infrastructure, demonstrates the embedded lending model by offering merchant cash advances with automatic repayment through daily sales, capturing interest spreads without traditional credit risk assessment. Klarna and Afterpay monetize BNPL through interest-free periods for consumers while earning 2-8% merchant fees plus late payment charges from consumers who extend payment terms.

Unit operates a pure BaaS licensing model, charging clients setup fees, monthly subscriptions, and per-transaction costs to access their embedded banking infrastructure without handling end-customer relationships directly. Solarisbank combines licensing revenue with transaction volume sharing, earning both fixed monthly fees and variable income that scales with client growth.

Tesla Insurance represents embedded insurance monetization, capturing both premium revenue and data advantages by integrating coverage directly into vehicle purchases while leveraging driving behavior data for risk assessment and pricing optimization.

Wondering who's shaping this fast-moving industry? Our slides map out the top players and challengers in seconds.

What does customer acquisition look like for embedded finance platforms and how does it affect monetization?

Embedded finance platforms acquire customers through distribution partnerships rather than direct marketing, fundamentally changing acquisition costs and monetization potential.

Seamless onboarding via in-app KYC/AML reduces friction compared to traditional financial services, with conversion rates often 3-5× higher than standalone financial products. Data-driven personalization uses transaction and behavioral data to offer tailored products, increasing cross-sell opportunities and customer lifetime value.

Bundled platform usage creates powerful retention effects, with Square merchants using 4+ products retained 8-15× more than single-product users, directly impacting long-term revenue per customer. Loyalty incentives like Shopify Balance's 2% APY and up to $2,000 annual cashback drive repeat usage and deeper financial engagement.

This approach yields customer acquisition costs 4× lower than e-commerce and 30× lower than traditional retail banking, while generating higher customer lifetime values through integrated financial touchpoints that increase platform stickiness and usage frequency.

The embedded model allows providers to acquire customers at the moment of financial need rather than through awareness-based marketing, resulting in higher conversion rates and more efficient monetization from day one of the customer relationship.

If you want actionable data about this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Which industry verticals are driving the most revenue for embedded finance providers in 2025?

Five key verticals dominate embedded finance revenue generation in 2025, each offering unique monetization opportunities based on transaction patterns and customer behavior.

E-commerce and retail platforms generate the largest volume through embedded payments and BNPL services, with merchants experiencing 10-20% higher conversion rates and larger average order values when offering integrated financing options. Payment volume in this sector exceeds $200 billion annually across embedded finance providers.

Mobility and logistics platforms like rideshare and delivery services capture significant revenue through instant payouts and driver financial services, with companies like Uber Money earning interchange revenue while providing value to gig workers through immediate access to earnings.

Vertical SaaS platforms represent the highest revenue per customer segment, with B2B software companies embedding payments, lending, and banking services to boost revenue per user by 2-5× while reducing customer churn through increased platform dependency.

Travel and hospitality platforms monetize through embedded insurance and point-of-sale lending, with companies like Booking.com capturing commission revenue on travel insurance while platforms like Airbnb offer host lending products.

Gig economy platforms drive revenue through embedded lending, instant payouts, and financial services tailored to independent contractors, creating platform loyalty while capturing interchange and interest income from workers who rely on immediate access to earnings.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

What are the top 3 most profitable embedded finance business models and what makes them scalable?

Three embedded finance models demonstrate superior profitability due to their capital efficiency, scalability characteristics, and network effects.

Interchange-driven card issuing represents the most capital-efficient model, requiring minimal upfront investment while earning 0.2-1% of high-volume transactions. Providers like Stripe Issuing and Square capture interchange revenue without balance sheet risk, benefiting from payment volume growth without proportional cost increases. This model scales automatically with customer transaction activity and requires no credit risk management.

Embedded payments transaction processing offers predictable revenue streams with low incremental costs per additional transaction. Companies like Shopify Payments and Adyen benefit from network effects where increased merchant adoption drives more consumer usage, creating a virtuous cycle that improves unit economics over time. Monthly recurring transaction volume provides stable operational leverage.

Embedded lending interest spread models generate the highest absolute returns when structured as asset-light operations. Providers like Shopify Capital and Klarna earn interest spreads between 8-25% while syndicating loans with partner banks to minimize balance sheet requirements. This approach combines high yields with scalable distribution through platform integration, allowing rapid geographic expansion without regulatory complexity.

These models succeed because they leverage existing transaction flows, require minimal physical infrastructure, and benefit from data advantages that improve over time as customer bases grow and transaction patterns become more predictable.

What operational and regulatory costs impact embedded finance margins and how are providers managing them?

Embedded finance providers face substantial operational and regulatory costs that can consume 15-30% of gross revenue, requiring strategic approaches to maintain profitability.

Compliance costs include KYC/AML procedures, PCI DSS certification, PSD2 compliance in Europe, and ongoing regulatory reporting, often requiring dedicated teams of 5-15 compliance professionals for mid-size providers. Technology infrastructure costs encompass API development, security systems, fraud detection, and 99.9% uptime requirements that can cost $500,000-$2 million annually for established platforms.

Customer support for financial products requires specialized training and 24/7 availability, with staffing costs typically 2-3× higher than standard software support due to regulatory requirements and financial sensitivity.

Providers offset these costs through several strategies. Automated compliance systems from BaaS 2.0 providers like Weavr reduce manual KYC/AML processing by 60-80%, while shared compliance infrastructure through banking partnerships distributes regulatory costs across multiple clients.

AI-powered fraud detection and underwriting systems reduce manual review requirements by 40-70%, improving both costs and approval speeds. Revenue-sharing partnerships with banks allow providers to access balance sheets and regulatory licenses without full compliance burden.

Scale economics become crucial above $100 million in annual transaction volume, where fixed compliance and technology costs can be amortized across larger customer bases, improving unit economics significantly.

If you need to-the-point data on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Which monetization strategies show the most promise for 2026 with emerging technologies?

Three technology-driven monetization approaches are reshaping embedded finance revenue models for 2026, offering higher margins and new customer value propositions.

AI-driven dynamic pricing enables real-time risk assessment and pricing adjustments for loans and insurance products, allowing providers to capture 15-30% higher margins through personalized pricing based on behavioral data, transaction patterns, and real-time risk signals rather than static credit scores.

Crypto rails and stablecoin integration create new revenue streams through on-ramp/off-ramp services, cross-border micropayments with reduced FX spreads, and programmable money features that enable automatic payment splitting and smart contract-based financial products. Early adopters report 25-40% lower costs for international transactions.

Instant real-time payment infrastructure generates premium fees for guaranteed settlement speed, with providers charging 0.1-0.5% premiums for push-to-bank transfers and real-time rails like RTP and SEPA Instant. This model particularly benefits B2B platforms where payment timing creates significant business value.

These strategies succeed because they address specific customer pain points while leveraging technology advantages that create defensible competitive moats and pricing power unavailable through traditional financial services delivery methods.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

How do partnerships and white-label arrangements affect revenue splits and long-term profitability?

Partnership structures and white-label arrangements fundamentally determine revenue distribution and long-term profitability potential for embedded finance providers.

Traditional white-label BaaS models typically follow 70/30 revenue splits, where the branded platform captures 70% while the technology provider retains 30% of total fees generated. This structure limits margin potential for technology providers but ensures predictable revenue sharing and reduced customer acquisition costs.

Revenue-share partnerships incentivize mutual growth but require robust service level agreements to align interests effectively. Successful partnerships include minimum volume commitments, shared marketing investments, and escalating revenue shares based on performance milestones that benefit both parties.

Direct-to-market approaches offer higher margins but require significant customer acquisition investments and brand development. Providers like Stripe and Square have demonstrated that building direct customer relationships, even while maintaining partnership channels, creates more sustainable long-term profitability.

Long-term profitability depends on careful partner selection, balanced risk-reward allocation, and maintaining optionality to evolve partnership terms as market conditions change. The most successful providers combine multiple partnership types while building direct customer relationships to reduce dependency on any single distribution channel.

Partnership success metrics include customer lifetime value across the partnership, revenue growth rates, and the ability to expand services within existing customer relationships rather than purely transaction-based revenue sharing.

What key metrics and KPIs do investors and founders use to evaluate embedded finance businesses?

Embedded finance businesses require specialized metrics that capture both technology platform performance and financial services risk management effectiveness.

Take-rate measures net revenue as a percentage of total transaction volume, with healthy embedded finance platforms maintaining 0.5-3% take-rates depending on service mix. Activation rate tracks users completing KYC/onboarding processes, with successful platforms achieving 70-85% activation rates compared to 40-60% for traditional financial services.

Transaction volume growth demonstrates platform adoption and customer engagement, with leading providers showing 50-200% annual growth in early stages. Net interest margin applies specifically to lending platforms, where 4-8% margins indicate healthy risk-adjusted returns.

Interchange capture rate measures the percentage of available interchange revenue actually captured and retained, with efficient platforms capturing 60-80% of available interchange. Customer acquisition cost versus lifetime value ratios should exceed 3:1, with embedded models often achieving 5-10:1 ratios due to lower acquisition costs.

Retention rates prove particularly important, with embedded-user retention often 8-15× higher for multi-product users compared to single-product customers. Revenue per customer growth tracks monetization efficiency over time, while regulatory compliance metrics ensure sustainable operations.

Monthly active users and transaction frequency indicate customer engagement depth, while gross merchandise volume demonstrates overall platform health and growth trajectory essential for investor evaluation and strategic planning.

Conclusion

Sources

1. Deloitte - The Ecosystem Imperative: Embedded Finance
2. Investopedia - What is Embedded Finance
3. SDK.finance - Embedded Finance Solutions
4. Unit - Embedded Finance Platform
5. Stripe - Introduction to Banking as a Service
6. LinkedIn - How Embedded Finance Works Square Banking
7. SendFromChina - What is Shopify Balance
8. Sacra - How BaaS Companies Generate Revenue
9. Vodeno - Unleashing the Power of BaaS
10. Stripe - The Rise of Embedded Finance
11. Weavr - The Ultimate Guide to Embedded Finance
12. Expert Market Research - Embedded Finance Market
13. Vodeno - Embedded Finance Explained
14. ABSRBD - Embedded Finance Statistics for 2025
15. The Paypers - How AI and Blockchain Revolutionise Embedded Finance