What device management challenges need addressing?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the enterprise device management market in a clean and beautiful presentation

The enterprise device management market faces unprecedented complexity as organizations struggle to secure and control increasingly diverse device fleets spanning IoT sensors, AR/VR headsets, and traditional endpoints.

Companies spend between $3.25-$9 per device monthly on licensing alone, plus $95 per device for setup and ongoing support, while dealing with security vulnerabilities that increase 38% as devices age. Network equipment and IoT devices emerge as the hardest to manage at scale, creating significant opportunities for investors and entrepreneurs targeting automated provisioning, cross-platform unification, and edge device orchestration.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

What types of devices are typically the hardest to manage at scale in 2025, and why?

Network equipment (routers, firewalls) and IoT/edge devices represent the most challenging device categories for enterprise management in 2025.

Network infrastructure devices create management nightmares due to firmware heterogeneity across vendors and the high-volume nature of deployments. Organizations often manage thousands of these devices with inconsistent update mechanisms and varying security protocols.

IoT and operational technology (OT) devices, including edge gateways, industrial sensors, and medical equipment, pose even greater challenges. These devices typically lack standard MDM agents, operate on fragmented communication protocols, and can scale to tens of thousands per deployment. The absence of unified management frameworks forces IT teams to juggle multiple vendor-specific tools.

AR/VR headsets and edge-AI devices emerge as the newest challenge category. These devices run on proprietary platforms with limited enterprise management capabilities, forcing organizations to develop custom solutions or accept security blind spots.

Need a clear, elegant overview of a market? Browse our structured slide decks for a quick, visual deep dive.

How much time and cost do companies currently spend per month on device setup, maintenance, and replacement?

Organizations face substantial ongoing costs for device lifecycle management, with licensing representing just the tip of the expense iceberg.

If you want to build on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What are the most common security vulnerabilities caused by poor device management today?

Unpatched firmware represents the single largest security risk in enterprise device fleets, with obsolete devices showing 42.2 security advisories compared to 19.4 for current devices.

Default credentials and misconfigurations create easily exploitable entry points for attackers. Printers, routers, and IoT devices frequently ship with default passwords that organizations fail to change systematically. Misconfigured firewalls allow lateral movement once attackers gain initial access.

Shadow IT and unmanaged BYOD devices provide zero visibility into security posture. Personal devices and contractor equipment often access corporate resources without proper controls, creating prime vectors for initial compromise. Organizations struggle to enforce security policies on devices they cannot see or control.

Inadequate encryption and access controls lead to data exposure incidents. Many organizations fail to implement proper at-rest and in-transit encryption across their device fleets, particularly on mobile devices containing sensitive data like PHI or PII.

Device aging amplifies vulnerabilities significantly, with security risk increasing 38% as devices move beyond vendor support lifecycles. Organizations often continue using devices past their security-supported lifespan due to budget constraints or replacement complexity.

Which device management solutions are currently dominating the market and what are their biggest limitations?

Microsoft Intune leads the enterprise device management space with broad OS support and deep integration into the Microsoft ecosystem, but struggles with macOS depth and scripting capabilities.

What are the main pain points IT teams report when managing remote or hybrid workforce devices?

Provisioning delays and application installation failures top the list of IT frustrations, with users waiting hours or days for Autopilot policies and application deployments to complete successfully.

Visibility gaps create blind spots where unmanaged endpoints operate outside compliance boundaries without detection. IT teams lack real-time insight into device health, security posture, and compliance status across distributed workforces.

Support overhead multiplies complexity as administrators toggle between 5-7 different management tools, losing 15-25% of productive time to context-switching. This fragmentation increases response times and reduces overall efficiency.

Network connectivity issues compound remote management challenges. VPN dependencies and zero-trust authentication gates add latency and complexity to device interactions, creating user frustration and support tickets.

Policy enforcement inconsistencies across platforms mean identical security requirements get implemented differently on Windows, macOS, and mobile devices, creating configuration drift and compliance gaps.

How are regulatory and compliance requirements affecting device management policies in 2025?

GDPR and HIPAA regulations drive fundamental changes in device management approaches, mandating encryption, access controls, and comprehensive audit capabilities.

Encryption requirements now extend beyond traditional data-at-rest protection to include in-transit communications and endpoint-to-cloud synchronization. Organizations must demonstrate encryption implementation across their entire device fleet to maintain compliance status.

Audit trail requirements demand real-time logging and reporting capabilities. GDPR's 72-hour breach notification window forces organizations to implement continuous monitoring and automated compliance reporting systems that can quickly identify and document security incidents.

Multi-factor authentication becomes mandatory rather than optional for accessing devices containing regulated data. Organizations must enforce MFA policies consistently across all managed devices, regardless of platform or user location.

Vendor risk management extends compliance responsibilities to third-party devices and contractors. Organizations must ensure external devices meet equivalent security standards when accessing corporate resources or regulated data.

Wondering who's shaping this fast-moving industry? Our slides map out the top players and challengers in seconds.

If you want clear data about this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What challenges do companies face when integrating device management with existing IT infrastructure?

API limitations and legacy system incompatibilities create integration bottlenecks when connecting modern device management platforms with existing IT infrastructure.

On-premises device management consoles often lack modern API endpoints required for cloud-native integrations. Organizations struggle to bridge the gap between legacy systems and contemporary management platforms without extensive custom development.

Hybrid architecture complexity emerges when balancing cloud-native management capabilities with edge-based or on-premises requirements. Organizations must maintain consistent policy enforcement across distributed infrastructure while managing different authentication and communication protocols.

Data normalization challenges arise from inconsistent telemetry formats across device types and management platforms. IT teams cannot achieve unified analytics when each system reports device health, security status, and compliance data in different formats.

Single sign-on integration complexity multiplies when device management systems must authenticate against multiple identity providers while maintaining security boundaries between corporate and personal device access.

How are AI and automation being used to improve device lifecycle management, and what gaps still remain?

Zero-touch enrollment represents the most mature AI application in device management, automating device provisioning through Android Zero Touch, Apple DEP, and Windows Autopilot with minimal human intervention.

Predictive maintenance leverages AI models to forecast device failures before they impact productivity. Edge-deployed algorithms analyze device performance patterns, temperature fluctuations, and usage metrics to trigger proactive replacements or repairs.

Policy compliance automation uses AI to detect configuration drift and automatically remediate security policy violations. Machine learning algorithms identify anomalous device behavior and trigger corrective actions without administrative intervention.

Significant gaps persist in cross-platform scripting automation, where AI systems struggle to translate security policies into platform-specific configurations across Windows, macOS, Linux, and mobile operating systems.

Anomaly detection limitations prevent AI systems from effectively identifying sophisticated threats that mimic normal user behavior. Current machine learning models lack the contextual understanding needed to distinguish between legitimate administrative changes and potential security incidents.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

What are the most critical user experience complaints from employees regarding managed devices?

Slow boot times and application loading delays frustrate users when Autopilot provisioning stalls during critical phases, creating productivity barriers from day one of device deployment.

Inconsistent network connectivity stems from corporate VPN requirements and conditional access policies that slow device responsiveness and create unpredictable access to cloud resources.

Limited self-service capabilities prevent users from resolving common issues independently. Most MDM portals provide minimal user control over device settings, forcing employees to submit support tickets for basic configuration changes.

Application installation restrictions block users from installing productivity tools they need for their roles, creating friction between security policies and workplace efficiency.

Excessive security prompts and authentication challenges interrupt workflow continuity, particularly when users switch between corporate and personal applications on managed devices.

If you want to build or invest on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

How do companies handle cross-platform device fleets, and what inefficiencies arise from that?

Fragmented tooling forces organizations to maintain separate management consoles for Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android devices, preventing unified policy enforcement and increasing administrative overhead.

Profile and scripting complexity multiplies across platforms due to diverse endpoint capabilities and varying support for automation features. Regular expression support, configuration options, and scripting languages differ significantly between management platforms.

Data synchronization lag creates inconsistencies when policy updates take 15-480 minutes to propagate across different platforms, leaving security gaps during transition periods.

Training overhead increases as IT staff must master multiple management interfaces and platform-specific procedures instead of working within a unified environment.

Reporting fragmentation prevents organizations from achieving comprehensive fleet visibility when device health, compliance status, and security metrics exist in separate silos rather than consolidated dashboards.

What innovations and startups are emerging in 2025 to address device management pain points?

EdgeIQ leads innovation in workflow-first edge device orchestration, providing unified management capabilities for industrial IoT and edge computing deployments that traditional MDM platforms cannot address.

ScaleFusion (formerly EnMasse) specializes in cross-platform zero-trust provisioning, offering streamlined onboarding processes that reduce setup time and improve security posture across diverse device fleets.

Kandji focuses on AI-driven macOS lifecycle management, providing automated patch management, security monitoring, and compliance reporting specifically optimized for Apple enterprise environments.

IoT-focused UEM startups integrate device trust and risk-based policy enforcement, addressing the security gaps that emerge when traditional MDM approaches encounter specialized industrial and medical devices.

Trust-based security platforms shift from device-centric to identity-centric management models, enabling more flexible policy enforcement that adapts to user context rather than device type.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

What device management trends and challenges are expected to emerge between now and 2030?

Edge computing proliferation will strain current device management architectures as millions of AR/VR devices, industrial sensors, and micro-data centers require real-time orchestration at the network edge.

IoT device explosion creates management complexity that exceeds current platform capabilities. Organizations will manage hundreds of thousands of connected devices across manufacturing, healthcare, and smart building deployments, requiring new approaches to lifecycle management and security enforcement.

Convergence of MDM, UEM, and edge orchestration platforms will create unified management fabrics that span application deployment, configuration management, and security policy enforcement across traditional and edge computing infrastructure.

Generative AI integration at the edge enables real-time anomaly detection and autonomous remediation capabilities. On-device inference will allow immediate response to security threats without cloud connectivity dependencies.

Quantum-safe cryptography preparation becomes essential as organizations must implement cryptographic agility across device fleets to prepare for post-quantum computing threats. This requires fundamental changes to device trust models and certificate management approaches.

Conclusion

Sources

1. Forescout - Riskiest Devices of 2025
2. Everphone - Mobile Device Management Costs
3. Loffler - Managed IT Services Cost
4. NTT - Security Threats and Vulnerabilities
5. Security Brief - Device Configuration Security Issues
6. TechTarget - Top UEM Software Vendors
7. Reddit - Jamf Pro vs Intune Comparison
8. Cyber Magazine - Remote IT Challenges
9. Exinent - Remote Device Management Solutions
10. RSI Security - HIPAA Compliant MDM
11. Seabridge Health - HIPAA and GDPR Mobile Compliance
12. GraphOn - Remote Desktop Services Challenges
13. Expert Insights - RMM Challenges 2025
14. Appaloosa - Zero Touch Enrollment
15. EdgeIQ - Product Management Insights
16. Red Hat - Device Management at Edge
17. Intuz - IoT Device Management Guide
18. Other World - VR Business Challenges
19. TechTarget - Edge Computing Trends
20. AirDroid - MDM Costs Analysis
21. Reddit - Intune Setup Time Discussion
22. Microsoft Tech Community - Autopilot Provisioning Issues
23. LocknCharge - Device Replacement Costs