What enterprise network problems need solving?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the enterprise networking market in a clean and beautiful presentation

Enterprise networks face unprecedented challenges in 2025, from monthly outages costing six figures to security vulnerabilities that bypass traditional defenses.

With global enterprise networking spend projected to reach $95 billion in 2026, understanding which specific problems drive the highest costs and create the biggest opportunities has never been more critical for investors and entrepreneurs entering this space.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

What kinds of outages or disruptions are most common in enterprise networks today, and how often do they occur?

Enterprise networks experience outages monthly at 55% of multi-site organizations, with configuration errors and cyberattacks leading the charge as primary disruptors.

The most frequent causes break down into four categories: network software and configuration errors account for 9% of reported outages, while cyberattacks and ransomware drive another 11%. Capacity and demand overloads contribute 9%, though power failures still dominate at 17% of major disruptions. What's particularly concerning for network operators is that 13% of enterprises now face weekly outages, indicating chronic infrastructure instability.

Recovery times reveal the operational pain points clearly. While 63% of organizations restore service within expected timeframes, the financial damage accumulates quickly. Major data center outages—occurring 10 to 20 times annually on a global scale—routinely exceed $100,000 in direct costs, not counting downstream business impact or reputation damage.

The root causes point to specific technical vulnerabilities that create market opportunities. WAN congestion and MPLS oversubscription create predictable failure points, while inadequate Quality of Service policies and under-provisioned Wi-Fi access point density compound performance problems before they escalate to full outages.

Need a clear, elegant overview of a market? Browse our structured slide decks for a quick, visual deep dive.

What security vulnerabilities are IT teams struggling with most, especially after the major breaches reported in 2025?

Unpatched VPN systems and edge devices now represent the primary attack surface, with vulnerability exploitation serving as the initial access vector in 20% of incidents—a 34% year-over-year increase that signals a fundamental shift in threat patterns.

The vulnerability landscape has evolved beyond traditional perimeter defenses. Legacy operational technology systems create blind spots that attackers increasingly exploit, while identity and access management weaknesses allow lateral movement once initial access is gained. Misconfigurations across cloud and hybrid environments compound these issues, creating multiple entry points that traditional security tools struggle to monitor comprehensively.

Edge devices present particularly acute challenges because they often run outdated firmware and lack centralized patch management. VPN concentrators, which became critical during remote work adoption, frequently operate with known vulnerabilities due to complex update procedures and fear of service disruption during patching windows.

The financial implications drive security budget increases of 20-25% across enterprise organizations, yet many struggle with tool sprawl and fragmented visibility. Organizations report that inconsistent security policies across multi-cloud environments contribute to 45% of cloud-related security incidents, highlighting the need for unified security orchestration platforms.

If you want to build on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What specific network issues are driving the highest operational costs for enterprises right now?

Device proliferation and network complexity dominate operational expenses, with bandwidth costs and specialized support staff creating the largest ongoing financial burdens that automation could reduce by 20-30%.

The cost drivers break into predictable categories that reveal automation opportunities. Device count scales exponentially in distributed organizations, requiring dedicated support teams and creating maintenance overhead that grows faster than revenue. Network complexity compounds this challenge—enterprises managing multiple WAN technologies, cloud connections, and security tools need specialized expertise that commands premium salaries.

Bandwidth and transit fees represent the most visible cost escalation, particularly for organizations with heavy cloud integration. Egress charges from major cloud providers inflate networking bills by 20-25% beyond base connectivity costs, while MPLS circuits for traditional WAN architectures lock organizations into expensive long-term contracts with limited flexibility.

Support and maintenance staff costs create the hidden operational burden. Organizations typically require one network specialist per 500-1000 endpoints, with senior engineers commanding $120,000-180,000 annually in major markets. The skills shortage in network automation and security integration drives these costs higher, as organizations compete for talent capable of managing hybrid cloud and zero trust implementations.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

Which types of network performance problems—like latency, packet loss, or jitter—are most frequently flagged by users or monitoring tools?

Latency and jitter issues dominate performance complaints, occurring weekly to monthly in over 50% of multi-site enterprises due to congested links and underprovisioned WAN connections.

The performance hierarchy reveals specific technical patterns. Latency spikes typically originate from congested MPLS circuits or inadequate internet connectivity at branch locations, creating user experience degradation that monitoring tools detect before users complain. Jitter problems follow closely, particularly affecting real-time applications like video conferencing and VoIP systems that require consistent packet delivery timing.

Packet loss presents differently across network segments. Branch-to-headquarters connections experience periodic packet loss during peak usage hours, while remote access scenarios show consistent packet loss spikes during morning and afternoon remote work surges. These patterns create predictable monitoring alerts that overwhelm IT teams with false positives.

The geographic distribution of performance issues reveals infrastructure gaps. Organizations with international operations report 3x higher latency variance compared to domestic-only networks, while companies relying heavily on cloud applications experience performance degradation during internet backbone congestion events beyond their direct control.

How do current enterprise networks handle remote and hybrid workforces, and what gaps remain in 2025?

SD-WAN adoption reached 60% penetration, yet 35% of remote users still lack consistent quality of experience monitoring, creating visibility blind spots that undermine the promise of seamless hybrid work.

The deployment patterns show uneven progress across organization sizes. Large enterprises with dedicated networking teams successfully implement SD-WAN with integrated security, while mid-market companies struggle with complexity and often deploy partial solutions that create new management overhead. Cloud-based SD-WAN services address some complexity concerns but introduce dependency on provider uptime and performance.

Security gaps persist despite technology advances. Forty percent of remote sites lack unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) enforcement, creating inconsistent security postures that compliance teams flag as major risks. Traditional VPN solutions remain prevalent but create bottlenecks and security blind spots that sophisticated attacks exploit.

Quality of experience monitoring represents the largest remaining gap. While organizations measure bandwidth utilization and basic connectivity, user experience metrics for specific applications—particularly video conferencing and cloud productivity tools—lack standardized measurement and alerting. This creates reactive rather than proactive management approaches that frustrate remote workers and reduce productivity.

What are the most common pain points reported by IT departments managing multi-cloud or hybrid cloud environments?

Fragmented visibility across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud platforms frustrates IT teams 50% of the time, while inconsistent security policies drive 45% of cloud-related security incidents.

The visibility challenge stems from incompatible monitoring tools and data formats across cloud providers. Each platform offers native monitoring solutions that don't integrate well with competitors, forcing organizations to maintain separate dashboards and alerting systems. This fragmentation makes root cause analysis difficult when problems span multiple clouds or hybrid on-premises connections.

Security policy inconsistencies create operational overhead and compliance risks. Identity and access management policies that work seamlessly within single cloud environments often break down when users and applications cross cloud boundaries. Network security groups, firewall rules, and encryption policies require manual synchronization that introduces human error and creates security gaps.

Cost management becomes exponentially complex in multi-cloud scenarios. Egress charges vary significantly between providers and often surprise organizations with unexpected bills during data migration or backup operations. The lack of standardized billing formats makes cost optimization difficult, particularly for organizations running similar workloads across different platforms for redundancy or vendor diversification.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

If you want clear data about this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

How are AI and automation currently being used in enterprise networking, and where are they falling short?

AI-driven anomaly detection has gained traction for network monitoring, yet only 54% of critical alerts achieve auto-resolution within service level agreements due to policy gaps and limited automation trust.

The successful AI implementations focus on pattern recognition and predictive analytics. Network operations centers use machine learning algorithms to identify unusual traffic patterns, predict bandwidth requirements, and detect early signs of equipment failure. These applications work well because they operate within defined parameters and provide recommendations rather than taking autonomous actions.

Intent-based networking represents the automation frontier but faces implementation challenges. While vendors promise policy-driven network configuration that automatically adjusts to business requirements, real-world deployments struggle with complex policy conflicts and edge cases that require human intervention. Organizations report that 40-60% of intended automation policies require manual override or adjustment.

The trust barrier prevents broader automation adoption. IT teams remain reluctant to grant autonomous remediation capabilities to AI systems, particularly for critical infrastructure changes. This cautious approach stems from previous experiences with automation failures that caused broader outages than the original problems they attempted to solve.

What are the top compliance and regulatory challenges facing network infrastructure teams, especially with evolving 2025 data protection rules?

CISA 2.0 requirements and the EU Digital Services Act demand enhanced data locality controls and comprehensive logging, forcing 60% of enterprises to increase network segmentation efforts by 15% or more.

The new regulatory landscape creates specific technical requirements that traditional network architectures struggle to meet. Data residency rules require granular control over traffic routing to ensure sensitive information never crosses certain geographic boundaries, while logging requirements demand packet-level visibility that many legacy systems cannot provide without significant performance impact.

Encryption mandates present implementation challenges across hybrid environments. End-to-end encryption requirements conflict with traditional network monitoring and security inspection tools, forcing organizations to redesign their security architectures. The complexity increases when different regulations apply to different data types flowing through the same network infrastructure.

Audit and reporting requirements strain operational teams already managing complex hybrid environments. Compliance teams need real-time visibility into network configurations, traffic flows, and security policy enforcement, but current tools often provide this information in formats that require extensive manual processing to meet regulatory reporting standards.

What is the projected spend on enterprise networking in 2026 and beyond, and which segments are growing fastest?

Global enterprise networking expenditure will reach $95 billion in 2026, growing at 6% CAGR, with SD-WAN/SASE and zero trust architectures driving the fastest adoption rates.

If you want to build or invest on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What unmet needs are large enterprises expressing when evaluating network vendors or solutions?

Enterprises demand fully integrated SASE platforms with native AI orchestration and transparent usage-based pricing models, rejecting the current vendor landscape of fragmented point solutions and complex licensing structures.

The integration challenge tops enterprise evaluation criteria. Current vendors offer best-of-breed components that require extensive professional services to integrate, creating vendor lock-in and operational complexity. Enterprises specifically request single-vendor solutions that provide SD-WAN, security, and management capabilities without requiring separate contracts, support relationships, and integration projects.

Pricing transparency represents a major friction point in vendor evaluations. Traditional networking vendors use complex licensing models based on features, users, and bandwidth tiers that make cost forecasting difficult. Enterprises prefer consumption-based pricing that scales with actual usage and provides predictable cost structures for budget planning.

AI-driven intent orchestration capabilities remain underdeveloped across major vendors. Enterprises want network infrastructure that automatically adjusts policies and configurations based on business requirements and application performance needs, but current solutions require extensive manual policy creation and maintenance that defeats the automation promise.

Curious about how money is made in this sector? Explore the most profitable business models in our sleek decks.

How are enterprises planning to adapt their network architectures for emerging technologies like 5G, edge computing, and zero trust over the next five years?

Private campus 5G networks coupled with multi-access edge computing will redefine enterprise connectivity, while zero trust micro-segmentation enforced through network overlays becomes the standard security architecture.

5G private network deployments focus on specific use cases rather than wholesale cellular replacement. Manufacturing facilities implement private 5G for IoT sensor networks and autonomous vehicle coordination, while healthcare organizations deploy 5G for mobile medical devices and real-time patient monitoring. These implementations require integration with existing Ethernet and Wi-Fi infrastructure rather than replacement.

Edge computing architectures drive fundamental network redesign from centralized hub-and-spoke models to distributed mesh topologies. Organizations plan edge-to-cloud fabric implementations that provide consistent connectivity and security policies across distributed compute resources, enabling applications to run closer to users and data sources.

Zero trust implementation progresses through micro-segmentation strategies that assume no inherent trust based on network location. This architectural shift requires identity-based access controls, encrypted communications between all network segments, and continuous verification of user and device credentials throughout network sessions.

What technologies or startups are gaining traction by solving networking problems more effectively than incumbents in 2025?

Startups like NetBeez, Pensando, and Ethernity Networks outpace incumbents through user-centric monitoring, programmable data planes, and NFV acceleration that deliver lower total cost of ownership with superior agility.

NetBeez revolutionizes network monitoring through proactive, end-user perspective analysis rather than traditional infrastructure-focused metrics. Their approach monitors actual user experience for specific applications and services, providing IT teams with actionable insights about performance problems before users complain. This user-centric approach contrasts with incumbent solutions that focus on network utilization and device health.

Pensando addresses the programmable networking challenge through distributed data plane solutions that enable micro-segmentation and security policy enforcement at the hardware level. Their approach provides performance advantages over software-based security solutions while offering greater flexibility than traditional hardware appliances.

Ethernity Networks tackles the network function virtualization acceleration problem with specialized hardware that bridges the performance gap between dedicated appliances and generic servers. Their solutions enable organizations to deploy virtual security and networking functions without the performance penalties that traditionally drove hardware appliance purchases.

Conclusion

Sources

1. Uptime Institute Annual Outage Analysis 2023
2. PacketFabric Uptime Institute Report Analysis
3. Flashpoint Verizon DBIR 2025 Analysis
4. Data Center Knowledge OpEx Drivers
5. Dell Technologies Cloud Network Efficiency
6. Infosecurity Magazine Network Outages
7. iConnect IT Cyber Security Vulnerabilities 2025
8. Uptime Institute Annual Outages Analysis 2023