What are the business models in quantum computing?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the quantum computing market in a clean and beautiful presentation

The quantum computing industry has crystallized around seven distinct business models that are generating measurable revenue in 2025.

Quantum-as-a-Service leads with cloud access pricing from $0.10 per circuit execution, while hardware sales command $20-40 million per system. Software licensing, consulting services, and hybrid full-stack solutions complete the ecosystem, with Q1 2025 seeing $1.25 billion in total investment—a 125% year-over-year surge.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

What exactly are the different business models that exist today in the quantum computing industry?

Seven distinct business models have emerged in quantum computing, each targeting different customer segments and revenue opportunities.

Quantum-as-a-Service (QaaS) dominates the cloud access model, where companies like IBM Quantum, Amazon Braket, and Microsoft Azure Quantum provide remote access to quantum processors. Hardware sales represent the highest-ticket items, with companies like Quantinuum and IonQ selling complete quantum systems for $20-40 million per unit.

Software and middleware providers like Zapata Computing and QC Ware focus on quantum algorithms and orchestration platforms, typically charging $50k-$200k annually per seat. Consulting firms including Accenture and Deloitte offer integration services at $2k-$5k daily rates for quantum implementation projects.

Technology licensing has become crucial for intellectual property monetization, with companies like Cambridge Quantum licensing error-correction codes and compilers for $100k-$500k upfront fees plus 5-10% royalties. Government and defense contracts provide non-dilutive funding through programs like DARPA, with milestone payments ranging from $1M-$50M per program.

Hybrid full-stack solutions combine multiple approaches, with companies like Quantinuum offering integrated hardware, software, and cloud services under bundled pricing models.

How do these business models generate revenue, and what are the typical pricing strategies they use?

Revenue generation varies dramatically across quantum business models, with pricing strategies ranging from pay-per-use to multi-million dollar system sales.

QaaS providers use consumption-based pricing with IonQ charging $0.10-$0.30 per circuit execution via AWS Braket, while premium access commands $1,000-$2,000 per hour. IBM Quantum employs tiered subscription models with enterprise packages including guaranteed compute time and priority access.

Hardware manufacturers generate revenue through direct sales ($20-40 million per quantum system) and emerging lease models projected at $500k-$1M annually per rack. Software companies typically use seat-based licensing at $50k-$200k per user annually, with enterprise site licenses scaling based on organization size.

Consulting services operate on traditional professional services models with day rates of $2k-$5k and fixed-fee projects ranging from $200k-$2M depending on complexity. Technology licensing combines upfront fees ($100k-$500k) with ongoing royalties of 5-10% on solution value.

Government contracts use milestone-based payments structure, with total program values ranging from $1M for research projects to $50M for large-scale defense applications.

If you want to build on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Which specific use cases are currently driving real-world adoption of quantum computing?

Five primary use cases drive measurable quantum computing adoption with documented ROI across multiple industries.

What types of customers are paying for quantum solutions, and what are their main pain points?

Five distinct customer segments actively purchase quantum solutions, each with specific pain points driving adoption.

Financial institutions lead quantum adoption with real-time risk modeling needs. Goldman Sachs has implemented quantum Monte Carlo simulations for portfolio optimization, addressing the pain point of complex risk calculations that previously required overnight processing. These customers pay premium prices for speed advantages in high-frequency trading environments.

Pharmaceutical and chemical companies face 10-15 year drug development cycles costing billions. Companies like Merck and BASF use quantum simulation to model molecular interactions, potentially reducing trial phases by months. Their primary pain point is the enormous cost of failed drug candidates in late-stage trials.

Logistics companies deal with dynamic routing challenges in real-time. D-Wave's customers report 28% cost reductions in supply chain optimization, addressing pain points of fuel costs and delivery time constraints. These customers value solutions that adapt to changing conditions throughout the day.

Wondering who's shaping this fast-moving industry? Our slides map out the top players and challengers in seconds.

Government and defense customers prioritize cybersecurity threats, particularly post-quantum cryptography preparation. National security mandates drive purchasing decisions, with budget allocations of $1.2 billion through the US National Quantum Initiative. Their main pain point is staying ahead of adversarial quantum capabilities.

Energy and materials companies seek breakthrough innovations in battery technology and superconductors. Companies like Mitsubishi partner with quantum firms to design novel catalysts, addressing the pain point of decades-long materials discovery processes.

Which quantum computing companies or startups are leading in each business model category right now?

Market leadership varies significantly across business model categories, with established tech giants dominating infrastructure while startups lead specialized niches.

In QaaS, IBM Quantum maintains the largest quantum cloud network with over 20 systems accessible globally, while Amazon Braket aggregates multiple hardware providers. Microsoft Azure Quantum differentiates through hybrid classical-quantum workflows.

Hardware sales are led by Quantinuum (Honeywell-Cambridge Quantum merger) with trapped-ion systems, IonQ for cloud-native quantum computers, and D-Wave for quantum annealing applications. QuEra emerged as a leader in neutral atom quantum computing after raising $230M in 2025.

Software leadership includes Zapata Computing for quantum algorithms (though pivoting to AI), QC Ware for quantum-inspired classical solutions, and Q-CTRL for quantum firmware and control systems. Cambridge Quantum (now part of Quantinuum) leads in quantum software development tools.

Consulting is dominated by traditional firms with quantum divisions: Accenture's quantum practice, Deloitte's quantum consulting, and specialized firms like Multiverse Computing and 1QBit for algorithm development.

Technology licensing leaders include Riverlane for quantum error correction, Xanadu for photonic quantum computing IP, and ID Quantique for quantum cryptography patents.

What are some examples of companies that failed or pivoted, and what can be learned from their models?

Several high-profile quantum companies have failed or pivoted, providing valuable lessons about market timing and business model sustainability.

MagiQ Technologies, founded in 1999, initially focused on quantum cryptography hardware but struggled with commercialization challenges and eventually pivoted away from quantum computing. The key lesson: pure hardware plays require massive capital and specialized talent that most startups cannot sustain long-term.

Zapata Computing represents a successful pivot story, transitioning from quantum computing software to industrial generative AI in 2023. Despite early quantum algorithm development, they recognized that near-term quantum advantages were insufficient for sustainable revenue. Their pivot demonstrates the value of maintaining flexibility and adjacent technology expertise.

QC Ware evolved from pure quantum software to quantum-inspired classical algorithms, launching their Promethium platform that runs on GPUs. This strategic pivot acknowledges that quantum-inspired approaches can deliver value before fault-tolerant quantum computers arrive, extending runway while building customer relationships.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

The common thread among failed quantum ventures is overestimating near-term quantum advantages and underestimating classical computing improvements. Successful companies either maintain flexibility to pivot adjacent technologies or secure sufficient funding for the long development cycles quantum hardware requires.

If you want actionable data about this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Which business models have proven to be the most profitable so far in 2025?

Two business models have demonstrated clear profitability in 2025: cloud services and hardware sales with established customer bases.

IBM Quantum reported cumulative revenue of $1 billion across hardware, software, and consulting by mid-2025, making it the most profitable quantum computing business to date. Their hybrid approach combining cloud access, on-premises systems, and professional services creates multiple revenue streams from the same customer base.

Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT) achieved a surprising $17 million profit in Q1 2025, driven by photonic semiconductor demand beyond pure quantum applications. This demonstrates the profitability potential in quantum-adjacent technologies that serve broader markets while developing quantum capabilities.

D-Wave continues generating consistent revenue through quantum annealing applications, particularly in optimization use cases where their technology provides demonstrable advantages over classical approaches. Their focus on a specific quantum approach with proven applications has enabled sustained profitability.

Traditional consulting firms like Accenture and Deloitte have built profitable quantum practices by leveraging existing client relationships and charging premium rates for quantum strategy consulting, even before delivering working quantum solutions.

The least profitable models remain pure-play quantum software startups without hardware partnerships, as they struggle to monetize algorithms before fault-tolerant quantum computers provide clear advantages over classical alternatives.

Which quantum business models have attracted the most investment and VC funding this year?

Hardware-focused quantum companies captured 70% of the $1.25 billion invested in Q1 2025, representing a 125% year-over-year funding surge.

Major funding rounds in 2025 include QuEra's $230M Series B for neutral atom quantum computing, IonQ's $360M raise plus $1.075B acquisition of Oxford Ionics, and Quantum Machines' $170M for quantum control systems. These large rounds reflect investor confidence in hardware platforms approaching commercial viability.

Corporate venture capital has particularly favored AI-quantum hybrid companies and hardware control systems, with average deal sizes of $27M representing a 31% increase year-to-date. Major corporate investors include Google Ventures, Microsoft Ventures, and Intel Capital seeking strategic quantum capabilities.

Software and middleware companies received 15-20% of total funding, while services and consulting captured 10-15%. The funding distribution reflects the capital-intensive nature of quantum hardware development compared to software approaches.

Curious about how money is made in this sector? Explore the most profitable business models in our sleek decks.

Geographic distribution shows continued US dominance with 60% of funding, followed by Europe at 25% and Asia-Pacific at 15%. Notable European rounds include Alice & Bob's quantum error correction funding and Pasqal's photonic quantum computing investment.

What models are expected to emerge or gain traction in 2026 and why?

Four emerging business models are positioned for significant growth in 2026, driven by technological maturation and new market demands.

Quantum networking and communications will emerge as a major category, with companies like Alice & Bob, Riverlane, and ID Quantique developing entanglement distribution networks and quantum repeaters. The driver is increasing demand for unhackable communications infrastructure, particularly from government and financial sectors facing rising cybersecurity threats.

Edge-compatible quantum processors represent another emerging opportunity, with Quantum Brilliance developing low-power quantum systems for integration with high-performance computing and IoT applications at the edge. This addresses the current limitation of quantum computers requiring specialized data center environments.

Performance-based and value-share pricing models will gain traction, where quantum companies charge based on problem-solving outcomes rather than compute time. For example, logistics optimization payments tied to percentage cost savings achieved, aligning vendor success with customer value creation.

Quantum-AI convergence offerings will combine quantum processors with classical AI accelerators (GPUs/TPUs) for dynamic problem decomposition. Companies like PsiQuantum (potentially partnering with Nvidia) are developing integrated approaches that leverage both quantum and classical computing strengths within single workflows.

These models address current quantum computing limitations while creating sustainable revenue streams during the transition to fault-tolerant quantum systems.

If you need to-the-point data on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

How do players make money if they don't own the hardware—like through middleware, software, or consulting?

Non-hardware quantum companies generate revenue through three primary strategies: software licensing, consulting services, and technology partnerships.

Software and middleware companies like QC Ware and Cambridge Quantum monetize through per-seat licensing ($50k-$200k annually), enterprise site licenses, and royalty arrangements on quantum-accelerated modules. They focus on developing quantum algorithms, compiler optimization, and orchestration platforms that work across multiple hardware providers.

Consulting firms generate revenue through professional services at $2k-$5k daily rates, offering quantum strategy development, algorithm customization, and system integration services. Companies like Multiverse Computing and 1QBit specialize in translating business problems into quantum algorithms without owning hardware infrastructure.

Technology licensing provides recurring revenue through intellectual property monetization. Companies license quantum error-correction codes, compilers, and specialized algorithms for upfront fees ($100k-$500k) plus ongoing royalties (5-10% of solution value). This model scales without marginal hardware costs.

Partnership and reseller models allow software companies to access hardware through cloud providers like AWS Braket or Azure Quantum, taking revenue shares while focusing on application development. This approach reduces capital requirements while accessing diverse quantum hardware platforms.

Hybrid approaches combine multiple strategies, with companies offering software tools, consulting services, and training programs to maximize customer lifetime value without hardware ownership risks.

Are there hybrid business models that combine hardware, software, and services?

Full-stack quantum companies increasingly adopt hybrid models combining hardware development, software platforms, and professional services to maximize revenue and customer value.

Quantinuum exemplifies the hybrid approach, combining Honeywell's trapped-ion hardware with Cambridge Quantum's software stack and professional services. They offer bundled CapEx and OpEx models where customers can purchase hardware, license software, and access consulting services through integrated contracts.

IBM Quantum operates perhaps the most comprehensive hybrid model, offering cloud access through IBM Quantum Network, on-premises quantum systems for enterprise customers, quantum software development tools, and extensive consulting services. Their approach creates multiple touchpoints and revenue streams from single customer relationships.

PsiQuantum represents an emerging hybrid model combining hardware development with semiconductor manufacturing partnerships (potentially with Nvidia) and cloud service delivery. This approach leverages existing semiconductor infrastructure while developing photonic quantum processors.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

Microsoft Azure Quantum demonstrates a platform-based hybrid model, combining their cloud infrastructure with quantum hardware from multiple partners (IonQ, Quantinuum, Atom Computing) plus software development tools and consulting services. This aggregator approach reduces customer complexity while generating platform revenue.

These hybrid models provide resilience against technology risks, diversified revenue streams, and stronger customer relationships compared to single-focus approaches.

Which entry points offer the lowest barrier to entry for new players, either as startups or investors?

Software and middleware development offers the lowest barriers to entry, requiring $0.5-2M in seed funding and 6-12 months to revenue generation.

Conclusion

Sources

1. BytePlus - Quantum Computing Business Models
2. LinkedIn - Quantum Computing Business Models
3. Monetizely - Quantum Computing Pricing
4. IDTechEx - Quantum Computing Market 2025
5. CEUR Workshop - Quantum Computing Paper
6. Benzinga - Nvidia Quantum Partnership
7. SpinQuanta - Quantum Computer Uses
8. DKV Analytics - Quantum Investment Digest
9. UK Podcasts - Quantum Market Watch
10. EntreeCap - Quantum Computing Use Cases
11. IoT World Today - IBM Quantum Revenue
12. Investopedia - Quantum Computing Profits
13. Yole Group - Quantum Funding Q1 2025
14. The Quantum Insider - Q1 2025 Investment Surge
15. Business Wire - Global Quantum Technology Report 2025