What computational problems can quantum solve?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the quantum computing market in a clean and beautiful presentation

Quantum computing has reached a pivotal moment in 2025, transitioning from laboratory experiments to real-world commercial applications with verified speedups and substantial investment backing.

This comprehensive analysis examines the specific computational problems quantum computers can solve today, the industries actively piloting these technologies, and the investment landscape that's driving rapid commercialization. With over $4 billion in startup funding and demonstrated exponential speedups on actual hardware, quantum computing presents both immediate opportunities and strategic positioning for the fault-tolerant era ahead.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

What real-world computational problems have already shown speedup with quantum algorithms in 2025?

Three distinct problem classes have demonstrated verified quantum speedups on actual hardware in 2025, moving beyond theoretical advantages to measurable performance gains.

The most significant breakthrough came from USC and Johns Hopkins researchers who achieved unconditional exponential speedup on Simon's problem using IBM's 127-qubit Eagle processor. This marks the first time a quantum computer has shown exponential advantage over classical computers on real hardware rather than simulated environments.

LinQuSO algorithms combining Quantum Singular Value Transformation (QSVT) with Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) have demonstrated exponential speedups for linear-system-based optimization problems. These hybrid approaches are particularly relevant for materials science applications where molecular simulation meets optimization challenges.

Chinese researchers extended Grover's search algorithm to continuous optimization domains, proving quadratic speedup for path planning and spectral analysis problems. This advancement expands quantum advantage beyond discrete combinatorial problems to continuous mathematical optimization.

Need a clear, elegant overview of a market? Browse our structured slide decks for a quick, visual deep dive.

Which industries are currently testing or piloting quantum computing for tangible business use cases?

Six major industry sectors are running active quantum computing pilots with measurable business objectives and defined success metrics.

If you want to build on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

How much investment has gone into quantum startups and infrastructure in 2025?

The quantum computing sector attracted unprecedented investment in 2025, with Q1 alone generating $1.254 billion in funding—a 128% increase over the previous year.

Total 2025 funding across quantum startups and infrastructure reached approximately $4 billion, representing the largest annual investment in quantum technologies to date. This surge reflects growing investor confidence in near-term commercial applications rather than purely speculative long-term bets.

The funding landscape is dominated by four major players: IonQ secured $360 million in combined equity and strategic investments, QuEra raised $230 million in Series B funding, Quantum Machines completed a $170 million Series C round, and D-Wave obtained $150 million in equity financing.

Sector-specific investment breakdown shows quantum computer hardware receiving the largest share at $1.254 billion, followed by software platforms at $265 million, hardware components at $197 million, communication and security applications at $72 million, and sensing and imaging technologies at $30 million.

Wondering who's shaping this fast-moving industry? Our slides map out the top players and challengers in seconds.

What are the specific classes of problems where quantum computing is projected to outperform classical methods by 2026?

Six distinct problem classes show clear quantum advantage potential for commercial deployment within the next 18 months.

What benchmarks, case studies, or prototypes are expected to reach commercial maturity in the next 1 to 3 years?

Five major quantum computing benchmarks and prototypes are positioned for commercial deployment between 2025 and 2028, with clear performance metrics and business applications.

IBM's Eagle 127-qubit processor has already demonstrated exponential speedup on Simon's problem and is targeting chemistry VQE applications for drug-like molecules at greater than 50-qubit chemical accuracy. This represents the first pathway to commercially relevant molecular simulation.

Quantinuum's System Model H2 has achieved greater than 99.9% two-qubit gate fidelity and is conducting logical qubit quantum error correction tests. This platform is expected to enable fault-tolerant computations for cryptographic applications by 2027.

IonQ's collaboration with Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is developing QAOA benchmarks for Max-Cut problems on 50-node graphs, demonstrating superior solution quality compared to classical heuristics. These results will translate directly to logistics optimization applications.

D-Wave's Advantage 6.1 system has achieved materials simulation supremacy, outperforming classical solvers on Ising-model-based problems relevant to battery design and catalysis optimization.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

What are the current technical limitations that still prevent scalable quantum applications?

Five fundamental technical barriers continue to constrain quantum computing scalability despite significant hardware advances in 2025.

Noise and decoherence remain the primary challenges, with current error rates ranging from 0.1% to 1% and coherence times limited to microseconds or milliseconds. These constraints prevent the execution of deep quantum circuits required for complex algorithms.

Physical qubit counts are limited to approximately 150 qubits for gate-based machines (IBM Eagle, IonQ Aria) and thousands for quantum annealers (D-Wave), insufficient for fault-tolerant quantum computing which requires millions of physical qubits.

Quantum error correction remains in early demonstration phases, with the most advanced systems achieving only 24 logical qubits (Microsoft/Atom Computing). True fault tolerance requires hundreds of logical qubits with error rates below 10^-6.

Qubit connectivity limitations in superconducting systems and ion transport speeds in trapped-ion architectures constrain algorithm implementation efficiency. Most current systems lack the all-to-all connectivity needed for optimal quantum algorithm execution.

Software infrastructure remains immature, with nascent application-specific compilers, limited benchmarking tools, and underdeveloped hybrid classical-quantum orchestration frameworks that slow commercial deployment.

If you want clear data about this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Which companies or research labs are currently leading in producing fault-tolerant quantum systems?

Five organizations have emerged as leaders in fault-tolerant quantum computing development, each pursuing distinct technological approaches with measurable progress toward error-corrected systems.

What are the most commercially promising quantum algorithms and how do they compare to classical alternatives?

Five quantum algorithms show clear commercial viability with measurable performance advantages over classical alternatives in specific application domains.

QAOA (Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm) operates with circuit depths of 10-50 layers and requires parameter tuning, but demonstrates up to 10× performance improvement over classical heuristics for combinatorial optimization problems with 50-100 variables.

VQE (Variational Quantum Eigensolver) requires 10³-10⁴ measurement shots per iteration but scales exponentially better than classical density functional theory (DFT) for molecular systems with more than 50 electrons, making it commercially viable for drug discovery.

Grover's search algorithm provides quadratic speedup with O(√N) queries compared to classical O(N) search, offering significant advantages for unstructured database queries and pattern recognition tasks with large datasets.

HHL linear system solvers theoretically achieve O(log N) complexity compared to classical O(N) direct solvers, though practical implementation requires careful consideration of condition numbers and precision requirements.

Quantum neural networks (QNNs) require hybrid classical-quantum training but offer exponential advantages for specific kernel methods and sampling problems, particularly in financial modeling and machine learning applications.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

What regulatory, security, or ethical concerns could affect quantum adoption in the next 5 years?

Four major regulatory and security frameworks will significantly impact quantum computing adoption timelines and commercial deployment strategies through 2030.

Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) migration represents the most immediate regulatory challenge, with the UK's NCSC mandating transition by 2035 and NIST finalizing new cryptographic standards. Organizations must plan dual classical-quantum cryptographic systems during the transition period.

Export controls under the Wassenaar Arrangement are expanding to include quantum hardware and software, potentially restricting international collaboration and technology transfer. These controls will affect global supply chains and research partnerships.

Data privacy and intellectual property frameworks are evolving to address quantum-enhanced AI capabilities and quantum computing IP licensing. Companies must navigate complex patent landscapes and data governance requirements for quantum-classical hybrid systems.

Quantum-safe certification timelines vary by industry, with financial services requiring compliance by 2030 and government systems by 2028. These mandatory timelines will drive adoption of quantum-resistant technologies and accelerate market development.

If you want to build or invest on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

How are major cloud providers integrating quantum computing into their offerings in 2025 and 2026?

Five major cloud providers have launched comprehensive quantum computing services, offering both hardware access and development tools for enterprise customers.

What talent, infrastructure, or ecosystem gaps must be addressed to support quantum technology startups?

Three critical ecosystem gaps are constraining quantum technology startup growth and commercial deployment across hardware, software, and human capital dimensions.

The talent shortage is most acute in quantum algorithm development, error correction engineering, and quantum-aware domain expertise. Companies report difficulty finding professionals who combine quantum computing knowledge with specific industry applications like finance, chemistry, or logistics.

Infrastructure gaps include limited access to testbed facilities (Qu-Test, Qu-Pilot), insufficient cryogenic and photonic foundries, and underdeveloped integrated control electronics. Startups need shared facilities for hardware testing and validation before commercial deployment.

Ecosystem initiatives are addressing these gaps through programs like the EU Quantum Flagship open calls, US National Quantum Initiative funding, InstituteQ in Finland, and PlanQK in Germany. These programs provide funding, infrastructure access, and networking opportunities for quantum startups.

Curious about how money is made in this sector? Explore the most profitable business models in our sleek decks.

How can investors and entrepreneurs accurately assess technical readiness and commercial potential in 2025?

Investors and entrepreneurs should use three established frameworks to evaluate quantum computing ventures: Quantum Readiness Index (QRI), Quantum Technology Readiness Levels (QTRL), and commercial benchmarking metrics.

The Quantum Readiness Index scores organizations from 1-100 across strategy, operations, and technology dimensions, providing a standardized assessment of quantum adoption readiness. Companies scoring above 70 demonstrate sufficient preparation for quantum pilot programs.

Quantum Technology Readiness Levels (QTRL 1-9) evaluate technical maturation from basic principles through successful operations, with QTRL 6-7 indicating readiness for pilot deployment and QTRL 8-9 representing commercial viability.

Commercial assessment requires six key evaluation criteria: defining clear use cases with measurable KPIs, benchmarking quantum approaches against classical baselines using simulators, evaluating hardware and software stack maturity including error rates and access models, assessing team capabilities and strategic partnerships, monitoring regulatory compliance and intellectual property landscapes, and planning hybrid classical-quantum deployment strategies.

Specific metrics include quantum volume scores (measuring overall system performance), gate fidelity measurements (typically >99% for commercial applications), coherence times (microseconds to milliseconds), and error rates (target <0.1% for fault-tolerant applications). These technical benchmarks should be combined with business metrics including customer acquisition costs, market validation, and competitive positioning.

Conclusion

Sources

1. ScienceDaily - Quantum Computing Speedup
2. arXiv - LinQuSO Algorithm
3. The Quantum Insider - Continuous Optimization
4. The Quantum Insider - Q1 2025 Investment
5. AI Journal - Global Quantum Technology Report
6. Business Wire - Quantum Industry Report
7. Quantum Computing Report - OVHcloud Pasqal
8. OVHcloud - France Quantum 2025
9. Microsoft Azure - Quantum Ready 2025
10. IBM - Quantum Readiness Index
11. arXiv - Quantum Technology Readiness Levels
12. McKinsey - Year of Quantum 2025