How do synthetic data companies monetize?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the synthetic data market in a clean and beautiful presentation

Privacy-preserving AI development is driving a $3.7 billion synthetic data market by 2030, with companies monetizing through diverse models from pay-per-use APIs to enterprise SaaS platforms.

Healthcare, finance, autonomous systems and cybersecurity lead demand, while platforms like Microsoft, AWS, MOSTLY AI, Gretel and Synthesis AI dominate with varied pricing strategies focused on compliance, realism and vertical specialization. Understanding these monetization approaches is crucial for entrepreneurs and investors entering this rapidly expanding market.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

What kinds of synthetic data are being sold or licensed today, and who's buying them?

Synthetic data companies sell seven distinct types of data products, each targeting specific buyer segments with different privacy and scale requirements.

Tabular synthetic data dominates the market, mimicking relational databases for finance companies doing fraud detection and healthcare organizations conducting patient analytics while maintaining HIPAA compliance. These buyers pay $2-5 per credit because they need high-fidelity structured data that preserves statistical relationships without exposing individual records.

Image and video synthetic data serves autonomous vehicle manufacturers, robotics companies, and manufacturing firms needing edge-case scenarios for computer vision training. Synthesis AI and Datagen license pre-built datasets or create custom simulations, with prices ranging from $50,000 for standard packages to $500,000+ for specialized simulations. Text synthetic data targets chatbot vendors, market research firms, and sentiment analysis companies requiring diverse language corpora without privacy concerns.

Time-series synthetic data buyers include energy companies monitoring IoT sensors, telecom firms analyzing network traffic, and fintech companies simulating transaction patterns. Simulation-based synthetic data attracts aerospace, defense, and automotive companies needing physics-accurate virtual environments with ground-truth labels. Hybrid and partially synthetic data serves enterprises wanting privacy benefits while maintaining some real-data fidelity for critical business decisions.

Curious about how money is made in this sector? Explore the most profitable business models in our sleek decks.

Which industries are showing the strongest and most consistent demand for synthetic data right now?

Healthcare leads demand with 40% market share, driven by HIPAA compliance requirements and data scarcity for rare diseases and clinical trials.

Healthcare organizations pay premium prices ($5-15 per credit vs. $2-3 in other sectors) because synthetic patient records enable clinical trial simulations, drug discovery research, and population health analytics without privacy violations. Major health systems like Kaiser Permanente and pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer use synthetic data to augment small patient cohorts and test AI models on diverse populations. Financial services follows with 25% market share, where banks and insurance companies need synthetic data for fraud detection, credit scoring, and regulatory stress testing.

Autonomous systems represent the fastest-growing segment at 35% annual growth, with companies like Waymo, Tesla, and Aurora spending millions on synthetic driving scenarios to validate safety-critical AI systems. Cybersecurity shows consistent 20% annual growth as security vendors like CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks use synthetic attack data to train threat detection models without exposing real security incidents.

Retail and ecommerce demonstrate steady demand for synthetic customer data enabling personalized recommendations and demand forecasting while protecting customer privacy. These companies typically start with smaller pilot projects ($10,000-50,000) before scaling to enterprise contracts ($200,000-1M+ annually). Manufacturing and quality control represent an emerging but rapidly growing segment, with companies using synthetic defect data to train computer vision systems for automated inspection.

If you want to build on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

How do synthetic data companies price their offerings—per dataset, per API call, by subscription, or via licensing?

Credit-based API pricing dominates with 60% of companies using this model, charging $2-5 per credit where each credit generates specific data volumes.

What are the core business models synthetic data companies use—product sales, platforms, SaaS, consulting, APIs, or marketplaces?

SaaS platforms generate 45% of industry revenue, offering cloud-hosted synthetic data generation with subscription pricing and usage-based overages.

API-first services represent 30% of the market, where companies like Gretel and Tonic provide REST APIs and SDKs for developers to integrate synthetic data generation directly into applications. These companies achieve 70-80% gross margins because incremental generation costs are minimal once infrastructure is built. Product sales account for 15% of revenue, with companies like Synthesis AI selling pre-packaged computer vision datasets for $50,000-500,000 per license.

Marketplace models capture 5% of revenue through commission-based sales on platforms like Datarade, taking 15-30% fees from data transactions. Consulting and professional services generate 5% of revenue but often serve as lead generation for higher-margin SaaS contracts. White-label and OEM partnerships represent emerging models where synthetic data capabilities are embedded in partner solutions, generating recurring revenue through revenue sharing agreements.

Data-as-a-Service models provide continuous synthetic data feeds for specific use cases like cybersecurity threat intelligence or autonomous vehicle simulation, commanding premium pricing due to ongoing value delivery. The most successful companies combine multiple models, starting with API access to attract developers, then upselling to SaaS platforms for teams, and finally enterprise contracts for large-scale deployments.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

Which companies are leading the synthetic data space in 2025, and what are their main revenue streams?

Microsoft Azure and AWS dominate with 35% combined market share, generating revenue through cloud consumption models where customers pay for compute resources used in synthetic data generation.

How do synthetic data companies differentiate themselves—by vertical focus, data realism, regulatory compliance, or integration features?

Vertical specialization creates the strongest competitive moats, with healthcare-focused companies like MDClone commanding 3-5x premium pricing compared to horizontal platforms.

Companies like Hazy focus exclusively on financial services, building domain-specific templates for credit scoring, fraud detection, and regulatory compliance that generic platforms cannot match. Their deep industry knowledge enables them to charge $500,000+ for implementations that horizontal competitors struggle to deliver effectively. Data realism and fidelity represent the second strongest differentiator, with companies like MOSTLY AI providing mathematical proofs of privacy preservation and statistical accuracy reports that justify premium pricing.

Regulatory compliance becomes a table-stakes requirement for healthcare and finance, where companies must demonstrate HIPAA, GDPR, and industry-specific compliance certifications. Integration capabilities differentiate platforms through seamless SDK integration, cloud marketplace availability, and on-premise deployment options that reduce customer implementation friction.

Advanced companies bundle privacy technologies like differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, and federated learning to create comprehensive data protection suites that justify higher prices. Technical differentiators include generation speed, data quality metrics, and support for complex data relationships that basic synthetic data tools cannot handle. Geographic and regulatory specialization also creates differentiation, with European companies like Syntho emphasizing GDPR compliance and data sovereignty for EU customers.

If you want actionable data about this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What use cases have proven to generate the most revenue so far—training AI models, data augmentation, testing software, or simulations?

AI model training generates 50% of synthetic data revenue, with companies paying premium prices for high-quality training datasets that improve model performance on edge cases.

Data augmentation for rare events represents the highest-value use case, where fraud detection and medical diagnosis applications pay $10,000-100,000+ for synthetic datasets that improve model accuracy on infrequent but critical scenarios. Software testing and QA accounts for 25% of revenue, with DevOps teams using synthetic data to test applications without exposing production data or customer information.

Simulation-based training generates 15% of revenue but commands the highest per-project prices, with autonomous vehicle companies spending $500,000-2M annually for realistic driving scenario simulations. Privacy-compliant analytics represents 10% of revenue but shows the fastest growth, as organizations need synthetic data for business intelligence and customer segmentation without privacy violations.

Regulatory compliance and auditing applications generate steady revenue streams, with financial institutions using synthetic data for stress testing and model validation required by banking regulators. Research and development use cases in pharmaceuticals and healthcare create high-value contracts where synthetic patient data enables clinical trial design and drug discovery research without patient privacy concerns.

Need to pitch or understand this niche fast? Grab our ready-to-use presentations that explain the essentials in minutes.

Which monetization models have shown the highest profit margins in this space?

Credit-based API models achieve 75-85% gross margins because incremental data generation costs are minimal once infrastructure is built and automated.

SaaS subscription models deliver 70-80% gross margins through recurring revenue with low customer acquisition costs for existing users upgrading plans. Companies like Gretel and MOSTLY AI optimize margins by charging premium prices for enterprise features like dedicated infrastructure, custom privacy settings, and priority support while serving multiple customers on shared infrastructure.

Dataset licensing shows variable margins (40-70%) depending on development costs, with pre-built computer vision datasets achieving higher margins than custom simulations requiring significant engineering work. Marketplace models generate 60-70% margins on commission fees but require substantial traffic and quality curation to attract both data buyers and sellers.

Consulting and professional services typically show 40-60% margins but provide lower scalability compared to software-based models. The highest-margin companies combine multiple revenue streams, using low-margin consulting to win enterprise SaaS contracts that generate recurring high-margin revenue. White-label and OEM partnerships can achieve 80%+ margins when synthetic data capabilities are embedded in partner products with minimal ongoing support requirements.

Are there examples of companies successfully bundling synthetic data with other services or tools (e.g. labeling, model training, hosting)?

MOSTLY AI bundles open-source SDK capabilities with their commercial platform, providing offline data generation tools under Apache v2 license while monetizing enterprise features and support.

Gretel combines synthetic data generation with comprehensive privacy tooling including PII detection, data anonymization, and compliance reporting in packaged enterprise plans priced at $2,000+ monthly. This bundling strategy increases customer lifetime value by 3-4x compared to standalone synthetic data tools. Syntho offers integrated PII scanning, data subsetting, and rule-based generation alongside synthetic data creation, positioning as a complete data privacy platform.

Microsoft Azure integrates synthetic data generation with Azure Machine Learning, providing end-to-end ML pipelines where customers pay for both data generation and model training compute resources. AWS SageMaker similarly bundles synthetic data with model hosting, training, and deployment services, creating ecosystem lock-in that increases customer spending across multiple services.

Synthesis AI packages synthetic data with computer vision model training services, offering customers both training datasets and pre-trained models optimized for specific use cases. This reduces customer implementation complexity while commanding premium pricing for integrated solutions. Several companies bundle synthetic data with data labeling services, where AI-generated data comes with automatically generated ground-truth labels that would be expensive to create manually.

If you need to-the-point data on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What are the top growth strategies synthetic data startups are using in 2025—open-source freemium, white-label solutions, partnerships?

Open-source freemium models dominate startup growth strategies, with 70% of new entrants offering free developer tiers to build community adoption before monetizing enterprise features.

• Gretel's freemium strategy provides 100 free credits monthly for developers, converting 15-20% to paid plans within six months through usage-based upselling
• Cloud marketplace partnerships enable startups to leverage Microsoft Azure and AWS distribution channels, reducing customer acquisition costs by 40-60% compared to direct sales
• White-label solutions allow startups to embed synthetic data capabilities in partner platforms, generating recurring revenue without direct customer relationships
• System integrator partnerships with Accenture, IBM, and Deloitte provide access to enterprise customers through established consulting relationships
• Academic partnerships create research collaborations that generate credibility, publications, and access to graduate talent for specialized use cases
• Vertical-specific go-to-market strategies focus on healthcare, finance, or autonomous systems rather than competing as horizontal platforms
• Developer-first approaches emphasize easy-to-use APIs, comprehensive documentation, and community building through GitHub, Stack Overflow, and technical conferences

What new monetization opportunities or business models are likely to emerge in 2026—especially with advances in generative AI or regulation?

Generative AI-driven data marketplaces will enable automated creation and trading of custom synthetic datasets, with smart contracts facilitating instant licensing and revenue sharing.

Compliance-as-a-Service models will emerge as regulatory requirements tighten, where companies pay for ongoing monitoring and certification that synthetic data meets evolving privacy regulations across multiple jurisdictions. Federated synthetic data platforms will allow multiple organizations to collaboratively train AI models using synthetic data without sharing actual datasets, creating new revenue opportunities for platform providers.

Synthetic data validation and certification services will become standalone business models as organizations need third-party verification of data quality, privacy preservation, and statistical fidelity for regulatory compliance. Real-time synthetic data streaming will enable continuous generation of fresh training data for AI models, moving from batch processing to subscription-based data feeds.

AI-powered custom dataset creation will allow customers to specify exact requirements through natural language prompts, with automated pricing based on complexity and delivery timeline. Synthetic data insurance products will emerge to guarantee model performance and protect against privacy violations, creating new revenue streams for specialized providers. Cross-industry synthetic data exchanges will enable companies to monetize synthetic datasets across different verticals, expanding market opportunities beyond original use cases.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

What challenges or risks do synthetic data companies face when trying to scale revenue—IP, validation, trust, or market education?

Market education represents the biggest scaling challenge, with 60% of potential customers lacking understanding of synthetic data benefits and appropriate use cases.

Trust and validation concerns create significant sales friction, as customers need proof that synthetic data maintains statistical properties of real data while ensuring privacy protection. Companies spend 6-12 months in proof-of-concept phases before customers commit to enterprise contracts, extending sales cycles and increasing customer acquisition costs. IP and licensing ambiguity around model-derived data creates legal uncertainty that enterprise customers want resolved before large-scale deployments.

Technical validation challenges require companies to develop sophisticated quality metrics and testing frameworks to prove synthetic data fidelity, adding significant R&D costs and extending product development cycles. Regulatory uncertainty across different jurisdictions makes it difficult to guarantee compliance, particularly for healthcare and financial applications where regulatory approval can take 12-24 months.

Competition from cloud providers with deeper pockets threatens specialized vendors, as Microsoft, AWS, and Google can bundle synthetic data with existing services at lower margins. Talent scarcity in AI, privacy, and domain expertise limits companies' ability to scale engineering teams and serve multiple verticals effectively. Customer concentration risk affects many startups that depend on a few large enterprise customers, making revenue growth vulnerable to customer churn or budget changes.

Conclusion

Sources

1. Vallevik et al. - Arxiv
2. AIMultiple Research
3. PubMed - Healthcare Synthetic Data
4. Financier Worldwide
5. Research Nester
6. TechDemocracy
7. Cubig AI
8. OpenTools - MOSTLY AI
9. Eden AI
10. AI Hungry - Gretel
11. Subscribed.fyi
12. Datarade
13. Arxiv - Data Augmentation
14. Syntho Marketplace
15. Credence Research