How should I invest in vertical farming and controlled environment agriculture?

This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped vertical farming and controlled environment agriculture in a clean and beautiful presentation

Vertical farming and controlled environment agriculture represent a $57.9 billion market growing at 13.9% annually, disrupting traditional food supply chains through technology-driven indoor farming systems.

This sector solves critical problems like water scarcity, food security, and supply chain inefficiencies while requiring high capital investments and sophisticated infrastructure. Despite recent challenges with companies like Bowery Farming closing operations, the market continues attracting significant funding with deals like Oishii's $150 million Series B and Planet Farms' €200 million joint venture in 2025.

And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.

What exactly is vertical farming and controlled environment agriculture, and how do they differ from traditional farming?

Vertical farming grows crops in vertically stacked layers using soilless systems like hydroponics, aeroponics, or aquaponics, maximizing yield per square foot through artificial lighting and controlled environments.

Controlled Environment Agriculture (CEA) encompasses enclosed or semi-enclosed systems including greenhouses, indoor farms, and high tunnels that manipulate environmental factors like light, temperature, humidity, CO₂, and nutrients to optimize plant growth year-round. While vertical farming is a subset of CEA focused on vertical space utilization, CEA includes various controlled growing methods.

Traditional outdoor farming relies on soil, weather patterns, and seasonal cycles, requiring extensive land and water resources while facing variable yields due to weather unpredictability. In contrast, vertical farming and CEA consume up to 95% less water, deliver 10-400× higher yield per unit area, eliminate weather risk and seasonal limitations, and reduce "food miles" by enabling local production. However, these benefits come with significantly higher capital and operational energy costs, with energy representing 25-30% of operational expenses.

The fundamental difference lies in resource efficiency and control: traditional farming uses approximately 70% of global freshwater and covers 40% of Earth's land surface, while vertical farms can produce equivalent yields in 95% less space with dramatically reduced water consumption through recirculating systems.

What key problems are companies in this sector trying to solve, and which industries or supply chains are they aiming to disrupt?

Vertical farming and CEA companies primarily target urban food insecurity, resource scarcity, and supply chain inefficiencies that plague traditional agriculture.

The core problems include limited arable land availability, water scarcity affecting 40% of the global population, soil degradation reducing agricultural productivity, and climate change creating unpredictable growing conditions. Supply chain challenges are equally significant: fresh produce averages 2,000 miles of transportation and two weeks of transit time in the US, resulting in 30-40% food waste and nutrient loss.

These companies disrupt multiple industries simultaneously. In grocery retail, they enable year-round local production of fresh produce, reducing dependency on weather-sensitive imports and long supply chains. The foodservice industry benefits from consistent quality and specialty crops that traditional farming cannot reliably provide. Agricultural input suppliers face disruption as the focus shifts from soil amendments and pesticides to LED lighting, sensors, and IoT systems.

Logistics companies experience reduced demand for long-haul transportation as production moves closer to consumption centers, while real estate markets see repurposing of urban spaces for agricultural use. Labor markets also transform as farms require fewer agricultural workers but more technical specialists.

Need a clear, elegant overview of a market? Browse our structured slide decks for a quick, visual deep dive.

If you want fresh and clear data on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Who are the major players and promising startups in vertical farming and controlled environment agriculture today?

The vertical farming landscape features established companies with mixed track records alongside emerging startups focusing on specialized crops and technologies.

What are the most common business models in this space, and how do they make money—from selling produce, tech licensing, or operating facilities?

Vertical farming companies employ six primary business models, with most successful operators diversifying across multiple revenue streams to improve unit economics and reduce risk.

What kind of technologies and infrastructure are required to scale these operations, and which companies provide them?

Scaling vertical farming requires sophisticated integration of LED lighting, climate control, automation systems, and data analytics platforms, with specialized infrastructure providers emerging as critical enablers.

LED lighting systems represent the largest infrastructure investment, consuming 25-30% of operational costs. Market leaders include Signify (formerly Philips Lighting) and specialized horticultural LED manufacturers providing full-spectrum lighting with precise wavelength control. Climate-control infrastructure requires HVAC systems, humidity management, and CO₂ injection, with companies like Ceres Greenhouse Solutions offering energy-efficient passive greenhouse design and GAHT (Ground to Air Heat Transfer) systems.

Hydroponic and aeroponic infrastructure providers include Artechno Growsystems for vertical growing towers, CubicFarm Systems for modular growing platforms, and BrightFarms for turnkey greenhouse solutions. Automation and robotics come from specialized providers developing harvesting robots, seedling transplantation systems, and AI-driven crop monitoring.

Software infrastructure increasingly differentiates successful operations, with platforms managing everything from environmental controls to harvest predictions. Intel and CEA-List provide sensor integration and AI analytics, while companies like Intertek-CEA offer quality assurance systems for food safety compliance. Water treatment and recirculation systems require specialized pumps, filtration, and nutrient delivery mechanisms that maintain precise pH and electrical conductivity levels.

Wondering who's shaping this fast-moving industry? Our slides map out the top players and challengers in seconds.

What are the regulatory, logistical, or environmental barriers to entry in this sector?

Entering vertical farming faces significant regulatory hurdles around zoning, substantial capital requirements, and complex operational challenges that can derail unprepared ventures.

Zoning and land use regulations present the primary regulatory barrier, as most urban zones lack provisions for large-scale indoor agricultural operations. Securing permits requires extensive variance applications, environmental impact assessments, and community education about noise, traffic, and waste management. Water rights and quality regulations add complexity, as recirculating systems must comply with discharge standards and treatment requirements.

Capital requirements create formidable barriers, with facility construction costs ranging from $4-40 million depending on scale and technology sophistication. Energy costs represent ongoing vulnerability, as electricity for lighting and climate control can account for 25-30% of operational expenses, making operations sensitive to energy price volatility. Financing remains challenging as traditional agricultural lenders often lack expertise in evaluating technology-intensive farming operations.

Labor and expertise shortages compound operational challenges, as vertical farms require skilled technicians rather than traditional agricultural workers. Food safety compliance demands adherence to GFSI (Global Food Safety Initiative) and FSCC (Food Safety Certification Corporation) standards, requiring extensive documentation and traceability systems. Seed and input regulations vary by jurisdiction, with some regions restricting certain hydroponic nutrients or requiring organic certification for premium market access.

Environmental barriers include waste heat management, packaging requirements for extended shelf life, and potential conflicts with sustainability goals due to high energy consumption, particularly in regions with carbon-intensive electricity grids.

If you need to-the-point data on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

Which startups or companies have raised funds in 2024 and 2025, and under what terms or valuations?

Funding activity in 2024-2025 shows selective investor interest with focus on proven business models, specialty crops, and technology enablers rather than broad-scale expansion.

What are the forecasted market trends and investor expectations going into 2026 and beyond?

Market forecasts show robust growth with the vertical farming market expanding from $3.7 billion in 2021 to $10.5 billion by 2026 at 23.4% CAGR, while investor expectations shift toward operational discipline and proven profitability.

The broader CEA market demonstrates even stronger momentum, growing from $57.9 billion in 2024 to $126.2 billion by 2030 at 13.9% CAGR. Supporting technologies show explosive growth potential: LED lighting systems will expand from $1.2 billion to $3.5 billion by 2026 (23.2% CAGR), while software platforms will grow from $408.8 million to $1.3 billion (25.2% CAGR).

Investor expectations have fundamentally shifted from the "growth at any cost" mentality that characterized 2019-2021 funding rounds. Following high-profile closures like Bowery Farming, investors now demand clear paths to profitability, realistic market penetration projections, and proven operational metrics. This represents a maturation of the sector where financial discipline supersedes rapid expansion.

Technology trends point toward increased automation, with robotics and AI becoming standard rather than experimental. Energy efficiency improvements through better LED technology and passive climate control systems will reduce operational costs. Crop diversification beyond leafy greens into berries, herbs, and specialty vegetables will expand addressable markets and improve unit economics.

Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.

Can retail investors participate in this sector, or is it limited to venture capital, private equity, and corporate investments?

Retail investor participation in vertical farming remains limited, with most opportunities available through indirect exposure via publicly traded technology enablers and agricultural ETFs rather than direct investments in vertical farming companies.

Direct investment opportunities for retail investors are scarce because most vertical farming companies remain private and funded through venture capital, private equity, and strategic corporate investors. The few publicly accessible options include CubicFarm Systems (OTC: CUBXF), which provides modular growing systems, and Signify PLC, a major LED lighting supplier to the industry.

Agricultural technology ETFs offer broader exposure to the sector, typically including companies involved in precision agriculture, controlled environment systems, and agricultural biotechnology. These funds provide diversified exposure but may have limited pure-play vertical farming holdings due to the private nature of most operators.

Crowdfunding platforms occasionally feature early-stage sustainable agriculture startups, though these investments carry high risk and limited liquidity. Some real estate investment trusts (REITs) are beginning to include vertical farming facilities in their portfolios, providing another indirect avenue for retail participation.

The lack of retail access reflects the sector's capital-intensive nature, long payback periods, and operational complexity that institutional investors are better positioned to evaluate and support through the development phase.

If you want to build or invest on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here

What are the risks and potential returns of investing in vertical farming versus traditional agriculture or agri-tech?

Vertical farming investments offer potentially higher returns but significantly greater risks compared to traditional agriculture, with capital intensity and energy price sensitivity creating unique risk profiles.

What types of partnerships or pilot projects could help validate a new entrant's value proposition in this space?

Strategic partnerships with established food retailers, research institutions, and energy providers offer the most effective validation paths for new vertical farming entrants while reducing capital requirements and market risk.

Retail partnerships provide immediate market validation and distribution channels. Successful models include in-store pilot farms similar to Infarm's collaborations with Metro supermarkets in Paris, where modular growing systems demonstrate product quality and consumer acceptance while generating revenue. Restaurant partnerships offer premium pricing opportunities and direct consumer feedback, particularly for specialty crops like microgreens and herbs that command high margins.

Academic partnerships through institutions like UC Davis CEA Center provide research credibility, access to grants, and validation of growing techniques. These collaborations often yield published research that enhances company credibility while developing proprietary cultivation methods. Government pilot programs, particularly those focused on food security or urban development, offer funding and regulatory pathway guidance.

Energy partnerships address operational cost concerns while demonstrating sustainability credentials. Collaborations with renewable energy providers or waste-to-energy companies, such as Future Greens' food-waste-powered vertical farm concept, showcase environmental benefits and cost reduction potential. Utility partnerships can provide demand response programs and off-peak electricity rates.

Real estate partnerships reduce capital requirements by leveraging existing buildings and infrastructure. Property owners benefit from higher-value tenants while vertical farming companies access facilities without full acquisition costs. These arrangements often include revenue-sharing models that align interests between parties.

Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.

What's the most actionable first step to take right now to enter this industry as an operator, advisor, or early investor?

Conduct a comprehensive feasibility study that assesses local market conditions, regulatory environment, and financial projections under multiple scenarios before committing significant resources to vertical farming ventures.

This feasibility study should begin with demand analysis in your target geographic market, identifying potential customers (retailers, restaurants, institutions) and their willingness to pay premium prices for locally-grown produce. Analyze competitor presence, pricing strategies, and market penetration to understand competitive dynamics and positioning opportunities.

Regulatory assessment must examine zoning restrictions, permitting requirements, water rights, and food safety compliance in your target location. Many promising ventures fail due to unexpected regulatory hurdles that could be identified early. Engage with local planning departments and food safety authorities to understand approval timelines and requirements.

Financial modeling should include detailed CAPEX requirements for different facility sizes and technology levels, OPEX projections under various energy cost scenarios, and sensitivity analysis for key variables like yield rates, pricing, and operational costs. Model at least three scenarios: conservative, base case, and optimistic to understand risk ranges.

Crop selection analysis must identify high-value crops suitable for your climate control capabilities and market demand. Focus on crops with proven vertical farming success, existing premium market demand, and technical feasibility within your resource constraints. Develop pre-sales agreements or letters of intent from potential customers to validate demand assumptions and reduce market risk before major capital deployment.

Conclusion

Sources

1. Wikipedia - Vertical Farming
2. Britannica - Vertical Farming
3. Ohio State University - Controlled Environment Agriculture
4. Wikipedia - Controlled-Environment Agriculture
5. SafetyCulture - Vertical Farming
6. My Modern Met - Plenty Vertical Farm
7. IDTechEx - Vertical Farming Supply Chain Disruption
8. GreenState - Challenges of Vertical Farming
9. Statista - Vertical Farming Market Projection
10. Wikipedia - Bowery Farming
11. Agriculture Dive - Bowery Farming Closure
12. Wikipedia - AeroFarms
13. Quick Market Pitch - Vertical Farming Funding
14. Wikipedia - Infarm
15. The Spoon - Plenty's New Vertical Farm
16. AgFunder News - Vertical Farming Progress Report
17. Research and Markets - Vertical Farming Global Markets
18. Research and Markets - Controlled Environment Agriculture
19. Taiwan News - CEA Market Growth
20. IGrow News - CEA Investment Strategy 2025