How do zero trust vendors monetize?
This blog post has been written by the person who has mapped the zero trust security market in a clean and beautiful presentation
Zero trust vendors are making serious money through smart pricing models that most entrepreneurs and investors completely overlook.
The market leaders aren't just selling software licenses—they're building recurring revenue machines with subscription models, managed services, and strategic channel partnerships that deliver margins up to 40%. Understanding these monetization strategies reveals where the real opportunities lie for new entrants and investors looking to capitalize on this $78.7 billion market.
And if you need to understand this market in 30 minutes with the latest information, you can download our quick market pitch.
Summary
Zero trust vendors primarily monetize through subscription-based licensing models (per user, device, or gateway), usage-based pricing, and high-margin professional services. Enterprise customers drive the highest revenue through comprehensive platform deployments, while SMBs prefer pay-as-you-go models and government clients require compliance-certified solutions with premium pricing.
Revenue Model | Pricing Structure | Profit Margin | Target Segment |
---|---|---|---|
Per-User Subscription | $7-$50/user/month depending on features | 65-75% | Enterprise, SMB |
Per-Device Licensing | $1.50-$1.85/device/month | 70-80% | IoT-heavy enterprises |
Usage-Based Metering | Bandwidth/API calls/session minutes | 60-70% | Cloud-native companies |
Managed Services (ZTaaS) | $50-$200/user/month all-inclusive | 35-40% | SMB, Government |
Professional Services | $150-$300/hour consulting rates | 40-50% | Large Enterprise |
Channel Partner Revenue | 20-30% resale margins + revenue share | 15-25% | All segments via MSPs |
Flat Enterprise Contracts | $500K-$5M+ annual deals | 70-85% | Fortune 500 |
Get a Clear, Visual
Overview of This Market
We've already structured this market in a clean, concise, and up-to-date presentation. If you don't have time to waste digging around, download it now.
DOWNLOAD THE DECKWhat are the different business models zero trust vendors use to generate revenue?
Zero trust vendors operate four core revenue models that smart entrepreneurs should understand before entering this space.
Subscription licensing dominates the market, with vendors charging per user ($7-$50/month), per device ($1.50-$1.85/month), or per gateway/connector ($29+/month). Cloudflare's ZTNA starts at $7 per user monthly, while ZeroTier charges by authorized device count. This recurring revenue model provides predictable cash flow and high customer lifetime value.
Usage-based pricing captures revenue from bandwidth consumption, API calls, or session minutes—particularly effective for remote browser isolation and identity verification services. This model scales naturally with customer growth and usage patterns, making it attractive for cloud-native companies with variable traffic.
Flat-fee enterprise contracts represent the highest-value deals, where large organizations negotiate custom all-inclusive annual fees ranging from $500K to $5M+ with minimum seat commitments. These contracts often bundle multiple modules (ZTNA, SWG, CASB, RBI) and provide vendors with substantial upfront revenue.
Zero Trust as a Service (ZTaaS) combines software licensing with managed services, offering ongoing monitoring, policy tuning, and security management for bundled monthly fees. This model appeals to organizations lacking internal security expertise and generates margins up to 40% for vendors providing comprehensive management.
How do zero trust vendors typically price their solutions?
Zero trust pricing follows five distinct models, each optimized for different customer segments and use cases.
Pricing Model | Structure Details | Example Pricing | Best For |
---|---|---|---|
Per User | Monthly/annual charge per named user seat with tier-based feature access | Cloudflare ZTNA: $7/user/month | Knowledge workers |
Per Device | Billing per unique device authorized per billing cycle, regardless of user count | ZeroTier: $1.50-$1.85/device/month | IoT deployments |
Per Gateway | Base fee per ZT gateway node plus additional connector fees for scaling | GoodAccess: $29/month per connector | Multi-site enterprises |
Usage-Based | Metered billing on bandwidth, sessions, API calls, or data processed | RBI: $0.10-$0.50 per GB consumed | Variable workloads |
Flat Enterprise | Negotiated contract covering all modules for set period with volume discounts | Custom deals: $500K-$5M+ annually | Fortune 500 |
Freemium Tiers | Free basic access with paid upgrades for advanced features and scale | Free up to 50 users, then $5-$15/user | Startup adoption |
Managed Service | All-inclusive service covering software, monitoring, and management | $50-$200/user/month for ZTaaS | SMB, Government |

If you want to build on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here
Which revenue streams tend to be the most profitable for zero trust players right now?
Enterprise subscription models combined with professional services deliver the highest profitability for zero trust vendors.
Large-scale enterprise deployments (10,000+ seats) generate stable recurring revenue with 70-85% gross margins. These customers typically commit to multi-year contracts with annual prepayments, providing vendors with predictable cash flow and reduced churn risk. The key profit driver is achieving scale efficiency where incremental customer additions have minimal marginal costs.
Professional services represent the highest-margin revenue stream, with consulting rates ranging from $150-$300 per hour and project margins reaching 40-50%. Zero trust implementation consulting, security assessments, and custom integration services command premium pricing because customers need specialized expertise to deploy these complex systems effectively.
Managed services (ZTaaS) deliver sustained profitability with 35-40% margins by combining software licensing with ongoing monitoring and management. This model creates deeper customer relationships and higher switching costs, as vendors become integral to daily security operations.
Channel partner relationships contribute significant growth through MSP revenue-sharing arrangements that typically yield 15-25% margins. While lower than direct sales, channel partnerships enable rapid market expansion without proportional sales team investment, making them highly profitable at scale.
What types of customers are zero trust vendors targeting and how do monetization strategies vary by segment?
Zero trust vendors segment customers into three primary categories, each requiring distinct monetization approaches.
Large enterprises (10,000+ employees) seek comprehensive, multi-module platforms combining ZTNA, SWG, CASB, and RBI capabilities. These customers prefer per-user licensing with volume discounts and flat enterprise contracts that provide budget predictability. They're willing to pay 20-30% premiums for guaranteed SLAs, 24/7 support, and dedicated customer success teams. Enterprise deals often include professional services components worth 25-40% of the total contract value.
SMBs (50-1,000 employees) exhibit high price sensitivity and favor pay-as-you-go models or entry-level "essential" tiers. They typically adopt per-device pricing or usage-based models that scale with their growth. SMBs often bundle with managed services to offset their limited internal security expertise, making ZTaaS particularly attractive for this segment.
Government customers procure through GSA schedules and approved frameworks, requiring FedRAMP or FIPS-certified solutions that command premium pricing. They prefer flat-fee or per-user licensing with long-term contracts (3-5 years) and often deploy on-premises connectors for compliance requirements. Government deals include substantial compliance integration costs, adding 15-25% to base pricing.
Curious about how money is made in this sector? Explore the most profitable business models in our sleek decks.
The Market Pitch
Without the Noise
We have prepared a clean, beautiful and structured summary of this market, ideal if you want to get smart fast, or present it clearly.
DOWNLOADWhat value-added services do vendors offer to boost monetization beyond core software?
Zero trust vendors generate substantial additional revenue through six key service categories that often double total customer value.
Advanced analytics and behavioral insights command monthly fees of $2-$10 per user for UEBA capabilities that provide detailed security scoring and threat detection. These AI-powered analytics help customers identify anomalous behavior patterns and optimize security policies, justifying premium pricing through demonstrated risk reduction.
Premium support packages with guaranteed response times (1-hour for enterprise, 4-hour for mid-tier) carry 20-30% surcharges over base licensing costs. Vendors offer tiered support levels from basic email assistance to dedicated security engineers, with the highest tiers including quarterly business reviews and proactive security recommendations.
Professional training and certification programs generate $500-$2,000 per seat revenue through vendor-specific courses like Zscaler's ZTCA certification or ISC2's Zero Trust Strategy Certificate. These programs create customer stickiness while building internal expertise that drives deeper platform adoption.
Integration and customization services bill at $200-$300 per hour for API connectors and bespoke workflows connecting to CRM, SIEM, and ITSM platforms. Custom integration projects often range from $50K-$500K for enterprise customers requiring complex multi-system orchestration.
Zero trust maturity assessments and roadmap consulting services command $150-$250 per hour, with typical engagements lasting 4-12 weeks and generating $100K-$400K in professional services revenue per customer.
Which zero trust companies are currently leading the market in terms of revenue and customer base in 2025?
Five vendors dominate the zero trust market with distinct competitive advantages and revenue models.
Vendor | 2024 Revenue | Key Offerings | Customer Base | Competitive Advantage |
---|---|---|---|---|
Palo Alto Networks | $5.2B | Prisma Access (SASE), Cloud-NGFW, ZTNA | 8,000+ enterprises | Comprehensive security platform with AI-powered threat detection |
Zscaler | $2.8B | ZTNA, SWG, CASB, SSE | 10,000+ enterprises | Cloud-native architecture with global edge presence |
Microsoft | $2.5B* | Azure AD Conditional Access, Defender for Cloud Apps | 15,000+ enterprises | Native integration with Office 365 and Azure ecosystem |
Cisco | $2.1B* | Duo MFA, Secure Access (ZT), Umbrella SWG | 12,000+ enterprises | Enterprise networking heritage and channel partnerships |
Akamai | $1.2B | Enterprise Application Access, Intelligent Edge | 6,000+ enterprises | Global CDN infrastructure enabling edge security |
CrowdStrike | $900M* | Falcon Zero Trust Assessment, Cloud Security | 5,000+ enterprises | Endpoint detection expertise with zero trust expansion |
Okta | $800M | Identity governance, workforce and customer identity | 8,000+ enterprises | Identity-first approach with extensive app integrations |

If you want actionable data about this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here
What monetization models are most popular among successful startups in the zero trust space?
Successful zero trust startups employ freemium models with rapid upselling to capture market share and drive revenue growth.
Companies like Illumio, Zero Networks, and emerging players offer free entry tiers for up to 50 users or devices, then charge $5-$15 per user monthly for advanced features. This approach reduces customer acquisition costs while demonstrating product value through hands-on trials that convert at 15-25% rates within 60 days.
Instant SaaS provisioning with usage-triggered billing allows startups to onboard customers immediately without lengthy sales cycles. Charges activate upon exceeding free tier limits or accessing premium features like microsegmentation policies or advanced analytics, creating natural expansion revenue as customer environments grow.
Per-workload pricing for microsegmentation services appeals to cloud-native companies managing containerized applications. Startups charge $2-$8 per protected workload monthly, scaling automatically as customers deploy additional applications or microservices without requiring contract renegotiation.
API-first business models enable startups to monetize through usage-based pricing on security API calls, identity verification requests, or policy enforcement actions. This consumption-based approach aligns vendor revenue with customer value delivery and scales naturally with business growth.
Need a clear, elegant overview of a market? Browse our structured slide decks for a quick, visual deep dive.
What are the most common go-to-market motions used by vendors to land and expand customers profitably?
Zero trust vendors employ four proven go-to-market strategies that maximize customer lifetime value through systematic expansion.
Land-and-expand strategies start with pilot deployments of 50 users or fewer, often offered free or at substantial discounts to prove value quickly. Vendors focus on demonstrating immediate security improvements like reduced VPN help desk calls or faster application access, then systematically expand across departments as success metrics become apparent. This approach achieves 3-5x revenue growth within 18 months for successful pilots.
Proof-of-value workshops provide 30-60 day trials that showcase specific ROI metrics like breach detection time reduction or compliance cost savings. These workshops often include dedicated solution engineers who help customers configure realistic use cases and measure tangible security improvements, leading to conversion rates of 25-40% for enterprise prospects.
Channel and MSP partnerships accelerate market penetration through established customer relationships and technical expertise. Vendors offer tiered margin structures (20-30% for software, 35-45% for services) plus co-sell incentives that motivate partners to lead with zero trust solutions during security reviews or infrastructure upgrades.
Strategic technology alliances with identity providers, endpoint security vendors, and SIEM platforms create bundled offerings that increase deal size and reduce competitive threats. These partnerships often include revenue-sharing arrangements and joint go-to-market investments that expand addressable market while improving customer acquisition efficiency.
We've Already Mapped This Market
From key figures to models and players, everything's already in one structured and beautiful deck, ready to download.
DOWNLOADHow do zero trust vendors monetize managed service provider and channel partner relationships?
MSP and channel partnerships generate revenue through multiple complementary streams that often represent 30-50% of total vendor revenue.
Software resale margins of 20-30% provide partners with immediate revenue on license sales, while managed service bundles offering comprehensive ZTaaS generate 35-45% margins through ongoing monitoring, policy management, and security operations. These bundled services typically command $50-$200 per user monthly, depending on service level complexity.
Revenue-sharing models with MSPs include quarterly rebates based on customer retention rates and expansion revenue, incentivizing partners to drive platform adoption rather than simple license sales. Top-performing MSPs earn additional 5-10% bonuses for exceeding quarterly growth targets or achieving high customer satisfaction scores.
Training and certification resale programs allow MSPs to generate additional service revenue while building internal expertise. Partners earn $500-$2,000 per certification delivered, while vendors benefit from increased technical competency that drives deeper product adoption and reduces support costs.
Co-branded professional services enable MSPs to deliver vendor-certified consulting and implementation services at premium rates ($200-$400 per hour) while maintaining customer relationships. These arrangements often include lead-sharing agreements where vendors provide qualified prospects in exchange for revenue commitments.

If you need to-the-point data on this market, you can download our latest market pitch deck here
What new or emerging monetization opportunities are expected to shape the zero trust market in 2026?
Four emerging monetization opportunities will reshape zero trust revenue models over the next 18 months.
AI-powered continuous verification services represent the highest-growth opportunity, with vendors launching subscription offerings for real-time risk scoring and dynamic policy adjustments. Early implementations command $3-$12 per user monthly premiums over basic zero trust services, with customers reporting 40-60% reduction in false positive security alerts and improved user experience.
Zero Trust Network Edge (ZTNE) deployments enable per-edge node pricing models as organizations deploy security capabilities closer to users and applications. Vendors are introducing edge appliance licensing at $500-$2,000 monthly per node, targeting enterprises with distributed operations requiring low-latency security enforcement.
Cross-vendor trust federation platforms create new revenue streams by facilitating interoperability between different zero trust implementations. These platforms charge transaction fees for trust exchanges and policy synchronization, typically $0.01-$0.05 per verification event across vendor boundaries.
Cyber-insurance collaboration programs offer premium discounts for policyholders deploying certified zero trust frameworks, creating revenue-sharing opportunities between security vendors and insurance providers. Early partnerships show 10-15% insurance premium reductions driving incremental security investment of $50-$200 per employee annually.
Looking for the latest market trends? We break them down in sharp, digestible presentations you can skim or share.
What usage or pricing models have failed or been phased out in the zero trust space?
Three pricing models have proven unsuccessful and are being rapidly abandoned by zero trust vendors.
Per-appliance hardware licensing failed as organizations shifted to cloud-first architectures that eliminate traditional network perimeters. Vendors charging $50K-$200K for physical zero trust appliances lost market share to cloud-native solutions offering similar capabilities through software-only deployments at 60-80% lower total cost of ownership.
Unlimited-user flat fees created revenue unpredictability for vendors and pricing unfairness for smaller customers. Early zero trust platforms offering unlimited access for fixed annual fees ($100K-$500K) struggled with cost management as large enterprises onboarded thousands of users, while small customers overpaid for minimal usage.
Single-product mono-module pricing became ineffective as customers demanded integrated security platforms rather than point solutions. Vendors charging separately for each security function (ZTNA, SWG, CASB) faced competitive pressure from platforms offering bundled pricing that reduced total cost and complexity for enterprise buyers.
Perpetual licensing with maintenance fees has been largely phased out in favor of subscription models that provide predictable revenue and enable continuous product updates. The complexity of zero trust implementations requires ongoing security intelligence and policy updates that perpetual models couldn't adequately support.
What are compelling example use cases that illustrate how zero trust solutions deliver ROI and drive customer willingness to pay?
Five use cases demonstrate clear ROI metrics that justify zero trust investment and drive customer purchasing decisions.
Use Case | ROI Driver | Quantified Benefit | Investment Justification |
---|---|---|---|
Secure Remote Access | VPN infrastructure elimination and reduced help desk burden | 50% reduction in access-related breaches, 70% fewer help desk tickets | $200-$500 annual savings per remote worker |
Microsegmentation | Limited lateral movement and faster breach containment | 80% reduction in lateral movement, 30% lower breach impact costs | $2M-$10M potential breach cost avoidance |
M&A Integration | Accelerated identity and application onboarding | 75% faster integration timeline, reduced compliance risk | $1M-$5M in accelerated business value realization |
Compliance Automation | Legacy security tool consolidation and audit efficiency | $20/employee/month savings through tool rationalization | 25-40% reduction in compliance management costs |
Cloud-to-On-Prem Access | Secure hybrid cloud connectivity without VPN complexity | 60% reduction in data exfiltration incidents | $500K-$2M annual cloud security cost optimization |
Third-Party Access | Contractor and vendor access control without network access | 90% reduction in third-party related security incidents | $100-$300 per external user annual risk reduction |
Application Modernization | Legacy application protection during cloud migration | 50% faster application migration with maintained security | $1M-$3M in accelerated digital transformation ROI |
Planning your next move in this new space? Start with a clean visual breakdown of market size, models, and momentum.
Conclusion
Zero trust vendors have built sophisticated monetization engines that extend far beyond simple software licensing, creating multiple revenue streams through subscription models, professional services, and strategic partnerships.
The most successful vendors combine enterprise-focused subscription pricing with high-margin managed services and strategic channel partnerships, while emerging opportunities in AI-powered continuous verification and edge security deployment promise new revenue streams for 2026 and beyond.
Sources
- Cloudflare Zero Trust Pricing Plans
- ZeroTier Pricing Documentation
- IT Pro - Zero Trust Channel Benefits
- GoodAccess Pricing
- RSA Conference - SMB Zero Trust
- GDIT - Zero Trust ROI for Agencies
- Zscaler ZTCA Certification
- ISC2 Zero Trust Strategy Certificate
- Bank Info Security - Zero Networks Funding
- Microsoft Zero Trust ROI Study
- Channel Futures - MSP Zero Trust Opportunity
- NordLayer - Zero Trust for MSPs
Read more blog posts
-Zero Trust Security: Who Are the Key Investors
-Zero Trust Security Funding Landscape and Investment Trends
-How Big is the Zero Trust Security Market
-Zero Trust Security Investment Opportunities and Market Potential
-Zero Trust Security: Latest Technology Innovations and Breakthroughs
-Zero Trust Security Market Problems and Challenges
-Top Zero Trust Security Startups to Watch